What do you think?
Rate this book
The Sex Factor: How Women Made the West Rich
Why did the West become so rich? Why is inequality rising? How 'free' should markets be? And what does sex have to do with it?
In this passionate and skilfully argued book, leading feminist Victoria Bateman shows how we can only understand the burning economic issues of our time if we put sex and gender - 'the sex factor' - at the heart of the picture. Spanning the globe and drawing on thousands of years of history, Bateman tells a bold story about how the status and freedom of women are central to our prosperity. Genuine female empowerment requires us not only to recognize the liberating potential of markets and smart government policies but also to challenge the double-standard of many modern feminists when they celebrate the brain while denigrating the body.
This iconoclastic book is a devastating expos� of what we have lost from ignoring 'the sex factor' and of how reversing this neglect can drive the smart economic policies we need today.
In this passionate and skilfully argued book, leading feminist Victoria Bateman shows how we can only understand the burning economic issues of our time if we put sex and gender - 'the sex factor' - at the heart of the picture. Spanning the globe and drawing on thousands of years of history, Bateman tells a bold story about how the status and freedom of women are central to our prosperity. Genuine female empowerment requires us not only to recognize the liberating potential of markets and smart government policies but also to challenge the double-standard of many modern feminists when they celebrate the brain while denigrating the body.
This iconoclastic book is a devastating expos� of what we have lost from ignoring 'the sex factor' and of how reversing this neglect can drive the smart economic policies we need today.
248 pages, Kindle Edition
Published July 1, 2019
11 people are currently reading
478 people want to read
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 12 of 12 reviews
August 8, 2019
Overall thought this book was very well argued, very interesting and concisely crafted. The author clearly has a message she was trying to send and was open about acknowledging this fact, instead of trying to pass as an impartial assessment. One of my favourite things about this book is that it gave me a lot to think about. It is the type of book that could prompt a paradigm shift in the way that you both reflect on information that you have learned in the past and digest new information. There were many issues in the book that I felt were important to discuss and while I did not agree with all of the views, opinions and interpretations espoused by the author it provided a focal point for reflecting on these topics. Moreover this reflection prompted the need to first identify how I felt about a given issue and then critically examine and engage with the arguments made by the author which I enjoyed.
I also felt that this book was very well structured with the different sections as well as the overall book very clearly laid out providing ease of understanding and helping to facilitate and coalesce the overarching narrative. Beyond this, while some parts were repeated for effect, the writing style was concise and efficient, making the information easier to understand and made reading this book much more enjoyable.
A further thing about this book that I found very interesting was the lack of institutional affiliations and credentials (beyond recognizing some people as Nobel Prize winners) when referencing academics and the arguments that they have made, switching the focus from the credibility of the author more to the substance of their argument which I thought was an interesting choice. I also appreciated the global orientation of the book drawing evidence from countries all around the world to compare and contrast. Finally I enjoyed the practical orientation with respect to how these lessons can be used moving forward to try to improve both the discipline of economics, the global economy and the world more generally.
I also felt that this book was very well structured with the different sections as well as the overall book very clearly laid out providing ease of understanding and helping to facilitate and coalesce the overarching narrative. Beyond this, while some parts were repeated for effect, the writing style was concise and efficient, making the information easier to understand and made reading this book much more enjoyable.
A further thing about this book that I found very interesting was the lack of institutional affiliations and credentials (beyond recognizing some people as Nobel Prize winners) when referencing academics and the arguments that they have made, switching the focus from the credibility of the author more to the substance of their argument which I thought was an interesting choice. I also appreciated the global orientation of the book drawing evidence from countries all around the world to compare and contrast. Finally I enjoyed the practical orientation with respect to how these lessons can be used moving forward to try to improve both the discipline of economics, the global economy and the world more generally.
August 11, 2019
This is a very readable and important feminist book that uses history, psychology and philosophy, to show that economists cannot answer the big questions of their discipline if they continue to imagine it’s gender neutral. They have to take on board sex and gender. Then it can be seen that women played an important part in the industrial revolution and the subsequent relative wealth of the west compared with “the rest”, where woman have not enjoyed as much freedom and independence. Equality has to be present in the home and then it filters up into democratic institutions and the state. But it can’t start in the home unless the market is fair to woman and offers the opportunities they need. It’s a two-way street.
The book includes a defence of sex workers and asks the question: why is it that women are allowed to monetize their brains, but not their bodies?
The book argues that for a world of prosperity and equality, women need the freedom to choose what they do with their bodies, particularly when it comes to fertility and childbirth. Unfortunately many of the poorest women do not have access to birth control. If this was tackled it would help with many issues, including overpopulation and the depletion of the environment.
Victoria Bateman is well known for her nude protests. The elephant in the room is the fact that the economy free-rides on the free-labour of women in the domestic sphere, caring for the young and the old. Without this work the market wouldn't work. But it remains unrecognised even though when quantified it is equivalent to a large percentage of GDP. She tries to make this visible by displaying her naked body at public lectures and events.
The book includes a defence of sex workers and asks the question: why is it that women are allowed to monetize their brains, but not their bodies?
The book argues that for a world of prosperity and equality, women need the freedom to choose what they do with their bodies, particularly when it comes to fertility and childbirth. Unfortunately many of the poorest women do not have access to birth control. If this was tackled it would help with many issues, including overpopulation and the depletion of the environment.
Victoria Bateman is well known for her nude protests. The elephant in the room is the fact that the economy free-rides on the free-labour of women in the domestic sphere, caring for the young and the old. Without this work the market wouldn't work. But it remains unrecognised even though when quantified it is equivalent to a large percentage of GDP. She tries to make this visible by displaying her naked body at public lectures and events.
November 25, 2021
Partito bene, finito male: nei primi capitoli si parla molto di donne, ma negli ultimi ci si concentra troppo sulla teoria economica, senza citare le donne.
A fine lettura, mi rimane la domanda: quanto hanno contribuito le donne alla crescita dell'economia? Chissà.
A fine lettura, mi rimane la domanda: quanto hanno contribuito le donne alla crescita dell'economia? Chissà.
June 14, 2020
Victoria Bateman is a fellow and lecturer in economics at Cambridge University and campaigns against the marginalisation of women’s bodies in public life. This book, which makes some interesting points but is too dependent on sweeping assertions and broad generalisations, she argues that economics is gender biased and fails to consider both how women are important for economic growth and how real human behaviour impacts on economic activity.
Read
January 18, 2020So good, I've bought a copy so that I can reread and annotate. Full of useful information about the historical impact of women's freedom or lack of it on the success and sustainability of states and societies.
November 27, 2021
Voy a ser honesto: este libro me decepcionó. Creo que el problema principal es que la autora trata de abordar muchos temas sin un hilo conductor claro a través de ellos.
La mejor parte fue el primer tercio, después sí se cae.
La mejor parte fue el primer tercio, después sí se cae.
September 21, 2023
Really enjoyed reading this, was a great multidisciplinary explanation of the crossover between economics and feminism. Left me thinking about more intersectionalities such as race and the overall gender spectrum.
May 17, 2020
3.75*
July 7, 2020
While the book was full of thought provoking material it could have needed stronger editing, quite a lot of repetition and not enough clarity between chapters. Content 4,5/5, "readability" 2/5.
December 10, 2020
Women matter for both economic growth and economic freedom. This statement encapsulates Victoria Bateman's project in the Sex Factor. Bateman marshals several interesting points. One idea I hadn't encountered was that the age of first marriage in northern Europe at the beginning of the industrial revolution was quite old relative to the rest of the world: mid-20s in some cases. This both allowed some families to build some marginal start-up wealth and decreased the average size of families. Smaller families meant relatively fewer workers, which tended to push wages up. The higher wages increased pressure for labor-saving innovations. The story rings true to this non-economist, but I would like to have read several hundred more pages of the argument, with greater detail of how these factors failed to materialize in various other times and places.
Another interesting point Bateman brings up is the relative liberation the nuclearization of the European family afforded women. I'm used to reading about the nuclear family in terms of male domination, so this was a novel perspective. But as long as we're speaking in relative terms, it makes sense that a woman has greater agency in managing a small household than she does being bossed around by family elders in a much larger extended family household.
Bateman's lesson for current economic policy is that women's freedom is a key ingredient to overcoming sluggish growth. Reproductive freedom allows women to control the size of their families and to build greater personal wealth. Welfare provides a safety net so that a woman can leave oppressive relationships without losing everything. Universal or subsidized childcare liberates women to pursue careers without suffering a decade or longer hiatus in professional development.
Bateman occupies a rare ideological niche of being both feminist and capitalist. One small complaint I had about the book is the missed opportunity of engaging with Ann Cudd's work on feminism and capitalism. Cudd is briefly mentioned but not really engaged. This is unfortunate because in Capitalism For and Against, Cudd provides powerful arguments from a solid philosophical basis for the feminist elements of both existing imperfect capitalism and the possibility of reformed, explicitly feminist capitalism that very much complement Bateman's own economic analysis. This was a missed opportunity.
Another interesting point Bateman brings up is the relative liberation the nuclearization of the European family afforded women. I'm used to reading about the nuclear family in terms of male domination, so this was a novel perspective. But as long as we're speaking in relative terms, it makes sense that a woman has greater agency in managing a small household than she does being bossed around by family elders in a much larger extended family household.
Bateman's lesson for current economic policy is that women's freedom is a key ingredient to overcoming sluggish growth. Reproductive freedom allows women to control the size of their families and to build greater personal wealth. Welfare provides a safety net so that a woman can leave oppressive relationships without losing everything. Universal or subsidized childcare liberates women to pursue careers without suffering a decade or longer hiatus in professional development.
Bateman occupies a rare ideological niche of being both feminist and capitalist. One small complaint I had about the book is the missed opportunity of engaging with Ann Cudd's work on feminism and capitalism. Cudd is briefly mentioned but not really engaged. This is unfortunate because in Capitalism For and Against, Cudd provides powerful arguments from a solid philosophical basis for the feminist elements of both existing imperfect capitalism and the possibility of reformed, explicitly feminist capitalism that very much complement Bateman's own economic analysis. This was a missed opportunity.
Read
January 9, 2024Saggio dalla struttura sbilanciata: buon lavoro di introduzione ed esposizione delle premesse, ma la tesi dell’autrice sembra non giungere mai a conclusione, con il risultato che si arriva all’ultima pagina senza comprendere a fondo le sue intenzioni (se non quelle poche che descrive sin dalle prime pagine).
Interessante l’excursus storico, ma talvolta poco preciso anche per quanto riguarda la cura delle fonti e della bibliografia.
Peccato perché il tema era interessante (nonostante io non condivida molte argomentazioni) ma è stato approcciato in modo poco equilibrato e incompleto.
Interessante l’excursus storico, ma talvolta poco preciso anche per quanto riguarda la cura delle fonti e della bibliografia.
Peccato perché il tema era interessante (nonostante io non condivida molte argomentazioni) ma è stato approcciato in modo poco equilibrato e incompleto.
October 23, 2020
as much as victoria bateman is a total weirdo, i thought this book was very well written, especially the portion that spoke to the history of the economy as it relates to gender - how technological advances favored people with various builds for specific tasks and how that has changed over time. i would definitely recommend this book to people who are interested in economics and are looking for an edgier take, and it is definitely accessible to those who are not experts in the topic.
Displaying 1 - 12 of 12 reviews