Five stars aren't enough: ********** !
This book should be required reading for every Christian. It is, I think, the best treatment on the subject of the existence or, rather, problem of evil and suffering in a world governed by an all-powerful and all-good God. Less abstractly: the problem of suffering in a Christian theistic world. It is not just scholarly, or just pastoral, it is both. And it does both well.
What made my reading of it extra special, I think, was that I read this almost right after I read Bart Ehrman's God's Problem: How the Bible Fails to Answer Our Most Important Question-Why We Suffer. Carson's How Long O Lord?: Reflections on Suffering and Evil was perhaps the most thorough and complete decimation of a contrary position as I have seen. It was not meant as a response to Ehrman; indeed, it was written long before Ehrman's book. But if both are read side-by-side, especially by the Christian (I would include the honest, open, and objective atheist, but I fear the existents in that set to be about equal to the existents in the set of unicorns), you will witness a knock-out blow reminiscent of early Mike Tyson. The opening chapter alone destroys Ehrman's thesis, and shows his analysis of the situation to be about as deep as a puddle. So after reading Ehrman this book was like the balm of Gilead for me! But enough about Ehrman...
Carson writes this book as both a scholar and a pastor. He has a Ph.D. from Cambridge, has authored numerous books, and is one of the most respected biblical scholars of our times. But he has also served as a pastor. He has a pastors heart. His many years as pastor and world-traveler have provided him with a rich resource of real-life situations that are very apropos. The reader, therefore, is in for a rare treat. As the eminent J.I. Packer states: "The two sides of the author, the biblical scholar who reads, thinks, and misses no detail and the pastoral teacher who understands people, feels with them, and cares for them, combine here to give us a treatment of suffering under God's sovereignty which is outstandingly accurate, wise, and helpful."
Carson wrote this book with the Christian in mind. He claims it is not meant for unbelievers. In one sense I understand, why try to sanctify the unjustified? But I think unbelievers can profit from this book in ways Ehrman could have. Straw men and misunderstandings and superficial analysis of the problem of suffering in a Christian worldview can be avoided by taking Carson's arguments and exegesis into account.
Carson also does not write for all those undergoing suffering right this moment, though some could surely profit. As he put it, this book is more preventative or preemptive. It is meant to provide a strong framework for understanding and thinking about suffering such that when that storm comes, and it will come, the Christian may be better prepared. As a framework, there are gaps. Carson does not mean to give a thorough and exhaustive analysis of every situation under the sun. Just enough to provide a solid structure from which to build on. Enough to weather storms. Though this book should be read by all Christians, as I said above, that doesn't mean by all Christians now. We've already said that it isn't for those going through a time of severe suffering. They might not be able to read the words through their tears. This book would help the Christian who has not suffered in thinking about suffering with a solid framework, especially if they take it to heart. However, for the Christian who has endured suffering, it is simply a beautiful message from the God of comfort.
For those who have thought about this issue, the book certainly does speak to the intellect. The ammo is here to provide a cogent answer to scoffers trying to make use of the problem of evil. But it is so much more than that that when you're through, the intellectual problem of evil seems so petty. Yeah, this book will help with answering the atheist, but that isn't its intention. It's intention is to help you face the trials. Maybe even more important, it prepares you for how to deal with and help others who are suffering. This book will make all Christians who read it able to serve their Christian friends as our Lord served us. But it doesn't give you a list of things to "say." The "right words" to make the suffering all better. Those Christians who give pat answers and make glib references to Scripture are soundly taken out to the wood shed by Carson. The last chapter is specifically devoted how to deal with people's suffering, though the virtues of a good comforter are portrayed throughout the book.
Carson offers many "pieces of the puzzle" for why suffering happens, but notes that none of them, none, can fully account for each and every instance of suffering. They are helpful, but not ultimately. At the end of the day, mystery is appealed to. The concept and function of mystery in a Christian worldview is almost to beautiful and majestic to put into words. So, many instances of suffering can be understiid by those various pieces of the puzzle. "When we suffer, there will sometimes be mystery. Will there also be faith?" Not only does this show that Carson's intended reader is the Christian, it also provides the impetus for Carson to invoke some powerful resources of Christian theology. Carson invokes sovereignty and providence. He also includes moral responsibility. All of these lead to a discussion of compatibilism, which Carson defends biblically (as opposed to a philosophical discussion, but some of his points can be brought over). All of this, in turn, is used as a comforting balm for the suffering Christian. The mystery of providence is comforting, says Carson. And indeed it is.
Some are tempted to mock a resort to mystery. Some, like Ehrman, claim that appealing to mystery is the same as saying there is no answer. Of course that inference is horrible. How one gets from, "I don't see the reason," to the proposition, "There is, therefore, no reason whatever," is beyond me. Those who chide mystery usually appeal to a premise called "noseeum." This premise reasons its way to the conclusion, "thereisnun." This inference pattern has been shown to be suspect.
The "noseeum" argument is that argument employed by atheists in giving the evidential argument from evil. That is, they acknowledge the logical argument is dead, and so now argue from evidences to alleged cases of gratuitous suffering. A paradigm case is Bambi suffering in a forest fire (this also assumes a certain view on natural evils which I do not hold, but I don't need to flesh that out for our purposes). The argument is that it appears that there could be no good reason, no God-justifying-good, for this case of evil. They acknowledge that what matters is not that one can't conceive of a God-justifying-good, but that there actually be no God-justifying-good. They then argue for a strong link between appearance and reality, that's the induction that makes this not the traditional "logical argument from evil." The Skeptical theists, mainly: Alston, Bergmann, Rea, and Wykstra, offer arguments to the effect that there is no warrant to move from what we see to any actuality, especially given certain assumptions of the Christian worldview, viz., Creator/creature distinction, doctrine of Incomprehensibility, our epistemic condition, the massively large and complex nature of an infinite God's plan, etc. This undercuts the "noseeum" argument.
Bergman says of this inference:
An aspect of this inference should make us wary. ...It takes 'the insights attainable by finite, fallible human beings as an adequate indication of what is available in the way of reasons to an omniscient, omnipotent being." But this is like supposing that when you're confronted with the activity or productions of a master in a field in which you have little expertise, it is reasonable for you to draw inferences about the quality of her work just because you 'don't get it.' You've taken a year of high school physics. You're faced with some theory about quantum phenomena, and you can't make heads or tales of it. Certainly it is unreasonable for you to assume that more likely than not you'd be able to make sense of it" (Bergman & Snyder, Contemporary Debates in Philosophy of Religion, p. 18-19).
Carson does not get into any of this in the book, so don't worry! The book can be read by the scholar and the layman. I'm just pointing out one rejoinder to the complaint against appeals to mystery.
This book will help you form a biblical framework which will help you to at least view future instances of suffering in ways that don't lead to sub or unbiblical thoughts about God. It will call you to praise God when thinking about past sufferings you have made it through. And though it will help you answer the nay-sayer, the ignorant atheologian, what is more helpful is that it will help you to help others. To help fellow Christians...at the right time. I'd rather help one Christian in a time of suffering than answer 1,000 atheist's challenges to the faith from the existence of suffering and evil in the world. So, this book deserves to be read. And if you've read it, read it again. I cannot offer a better review than this. The book is to beautiful to summarize. And, if I were to try, I would go far beyond the 10,000 character limit imposed by goodreads. My main goal was to press home how important this book is, how you need to read it. I hope to have done that.