What do you think?
Rate this book
失業白領的職場漂流：專欄作家化身高年級求職生的臥底觀察
《我在底層的生活》、《失控的正向思考》作者
《時代雜誌》知名專欄作家
芭芭拉．艾倫瑞克Barbara Ehrenreich
化身高年級求職生
臥底觀察失業白領的求職之路
《紐約時報》暢銷書 10週年新版
我預期這項計畫不如我在《我在底層的生活》經歷的工作那麼苛刻，
就體力上來說，實在很容易——不用刷洗，不用提重物，不用連續幾小時東奔西跑。
至於行為舉止，我想像自己可以不用像低薪的藍領勞工那樣，
隨時隨地都要卑躬屈膝與順從，我可以自由地做我自己，並表達自己的意見。
結果，我大錯特錯。
－－芭芭拉．艾倫瑞克Barbara Ehrenreich
傳統上，冷漠的人們會將藍領階級的處境歸咎於「不明智的抉擇」。
例如：大學沒畢業、經濟不穩定就生小孩，或當初怎沒選個有錢的家庭投胎。
但學經歷耀眼的白領階級，他們的前半生彷彿「什麼事都做對了」。
又為什麼一旦離開職場就再也回不去了？
重新找到一份還過得去的白領工作到底有多難？
強調專業、熱情、高效能、創意⋯⋯的主流企業文化和職涯訓練顧問，
又是如何一再將白領工作者推入深淵？
長期關注貧窮議題的芭芭拉．艾倫瑞克，繼偽裝成服務生、清潔工、大賣場收銀員報導底層生活後，這次化身高年級求職生深入企業界，臥底探索「白領階級」這個她過去不曾費心關注、而現在正向下流動的族群。
為了體驗白領失業後重新就業的困難，芭芭拉改了名字、捏造履歷，偽裝成處於「過渡時期」的中年婦女，甚至聘請了幾位「職涯教練」協助自己找工作，沒想到第一步就困難重重——
待業者交流聚會充滿心靈雞湯式的無意義教條；經理人訓練班其實是信仰佈道大會；
職涯教練用《綠野仙蹤》人物布偶替你諮商，而且像吃了興奮劑一樣過嗨；
永遠有做不完的性向測驗，但九型人格測驗和MBTI十六型性格測驗的結果卻完全相反⋯⋯。
最後，找工作逐漸變成失業者的「正職」，「求職」則成了另一群人的商機。
失業者背負著家庭生計、求職費用的龐大壓力，
最後只得打零工、從事勞動工作，社經地位不斷下墜，永遠無法翻身回到原來的世界。
芭芭拉．艾倫瑞克以幽默詼諧的筆調，犀利而深刻地揭發了社會的殘酷陰暗面，具體呈現白領階級的集體恐懼和無力感。同時也揭示了強調專業、熱情、高效能、創意、向心力⋯⋯的主流企業文化和職涯訓練顧問，實質上是如何以正面的言語剝削個人價值，將專業人力視為隨時可拋的免洗餐具。
歡迎來到白領階級的慘澹世界。
《時代雜誌》知名專欄作家
芭芭拉．艾倫瑞克Barbara Ehrenreich
化身高年級求職生
臥底觀察失業白領的求職之路
《紐約時報》暢銷書 10週年新版
我預期這項計畫不如我在《我在底層的生活》經歷的工作那麼苛刻，
就體力上來說，實在很容易——不用刷洗，不用提重物，不用連續幾小時東奔西跑。
至於行為舉止，我想像自己可以不用像低薪的藍領勞工那樣，
隨時隨地都要卑躬屈膝與順從，我可以自由地做我自己，並表達自己的意見。
結果，我大錯特錯。
－－芭芭拉．艾倫瑞克Barbara Ehrenreich
傳統上，冷漠的人們會將藍領階級的處境歸咎於「不明智的抉擇」。
例如：大學沒畢業、經濟不穩定就生小孩，或當初怎沒選個有錢的家庭投胎。
但學經歷耀眼的白領階級，他們的前半生彷彿「什麼事都做對了」。
又為什麼一旦離開職場就再也回不去了？
重新找到一份還過得去的白領工作到底有多難？
強調專業、熱情、高效能、創意⋯⋯的主流企業文化和職涯訓練顧問，
又是如何一再將白領工作者推入深淵？
長期關注貧窮議題的芭芭拉．艾倫瑞克，繼偽裝成服務生、清潔工、大賣場收銀員報導底層生活後，這次化身高年級求職生深入企業界，臥底探索「白領階級」這個她過去不曾費心關注、而現在正向下流動的族群。
為了體驗白領失業後重新就業的困難，芭芭拉改了名字、捏造履歷，偽裝成處於「過渡時期」的中年婦女，甚至聘請了幾位「職涯教練」協助自己找工作，沒想到第一步就困難重重——
待業者交流聚會充滿心靈雞湯式的無意義教條；經理人訓練班其實是信仰佈道大會；
職涯教練用《綠野仙蹤》人物布偶替你諮商，而且像吃了興奮劑一樣過嗨；
永遠有做不完的性向測驗，但九型人格測驗和MBTI十六型性格測驗的結果卻完全相反⋯⋯。
最後，找工作逐漸變成失業者的「正職」，「求職」則成了另一群人的商機。
失業者背負著家庭生計、求職費用的龐大壓力，
最後只得打零工、從事勞動工作，社經地位不斷下墜，永遠無法翻身回到原來的世界。
芭芭拉．艾倫瑞克以幽默詼諧的筆調，犀利而深刻地揭發了社會的殘酷陰暗面，具體呈現白領階級的集體恐懼和無力感。同時也揭示了強調專業、熱情、高效能、創意、向心力⋯⋯的主流企業文化和職涯訓練顧問，實質上是如何以正面的言語剝削個人價值，將專業人力視為隨時可拋的免洗餐具。
歡迎來到白領階級的慘澹世界。
272 pages
First published January 1, 2005
110 people are currently reading
3837 people want to read
About the author
Barbara Ehrenreich
95 books2,011 followersBarbara Ehrenreich was an American author and political activist. During the 1980s and early 1990s, she was a prominent figure in the Democratic Socialists of America. She was a widely read and award-winning columnist and essayist and the author of 21 books. Ehrenreich was best known for her 2001 book Nickel and Dimed: On (Not) Getting By in America, a memoir of her three-month experiment surviving on a series of minimum-wage jobs. She was a recipient of a Lannan Literary Award and the Erasmus Prize.
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 30 of 603 reviews
January 29, 2010
Part of the reason why I’m a somewhat less than trustworthy reviewer is that writers really do get extra points from me for being able to write well and for being nice people. I mean, if I have enjoyed spending time with a writer over the couple of days it has taken me to read their book, well, that goes a long way towards me thinking that their book was wonderful and worthwhile. This book was wonderful and worthwhile and it was written by someone who can both write and be nice at the same time. In corporate speak she ‘ticks all the boxes’.
Over the last couple of decades I have been either employed in a corporation, a government corporation, a local government authority or a trade union reacting to the corporate nonsense that is so beautifully discussed in this book. One of the things that amuses me most about corporate capitalism is how incredibly seriously it takes itself. I’ve always seen workplaces as more or less dysfunctional families. There are members of all families that seem to have been born with a disproportionate sense of entitlement. Others never seem to get the rewards they deserve according to the contribution they make in keeping the peace or the trouble they prevent happening to everyone around them. There are the crazy uncles who seem to have an aversion to using soap and the sister who does virtually nothing but is still everyone’s favourite, even if no one can quite say why. The last eight years of my life were spent representing people faced with the really yucky side of the corporate world – the part where the people I was representing were being disciplined or threatened with the sack. It has been a journey into the hideous side of human nature, a place where people show their worst sides - some more gleefully than others.
The premise of this book is related to the only other of Barbara Ehrenreich’s books I’ve read – Nickel and Dimed: On (Not) Getting By in America. In that book Barbara joined the ranks of minimum wage earners and showed how hard they were expected to work and how little rewarded they were. But white collar people then told Barbara she should write a book about their experience – after all, they had done all the right things: finished their education, not gotten pregnant in their teens and sold their soul to the corporation – and yet they still ended up feeling decidedly ripped off.
Barbara decides to try to get a job in the corporate world – she tries for a year. What this book really is, is a book about the scary world of white collar unemployment and recruitment. There are proselytising Christians who think that unemployment is as good a time to become converted to Jesus as any other. There are would be gurus on how to become employed whose sole advice seems to be that you should network and dream big. I thought the best piece of advice came from Barbara herself, that when doing a web search for work you should avoid the word ‘job’ as this will lead to millions of sites that linked that word with with the words ‘hand’ and ‘head’. If you ever needed proof the internet was designed by boys...
The big lesson in her excursion into attempting to be employed in the corporate world is how insecure everyone is – and not just the poor bastards who end up out of a job, but also those anticipating a restructure or a downsizing event or right sizing or an exercise in focusing on a corporations key competencies or core business or whatever the latest phrase for sacking people is. That is - everybody!
Marx says in Wage-Labor and Capitalthat the alienation of labour is due to capitalism reducing all skills down so that every job becomes unskilled. White collar workers are facing that experience today too, I think.
One of the things I was involved with in my endless years as a trade union ratbag was reviewing position descriptions and job classification structures. These are written so as to ‘broad band’ jobs, but the jobs themselves can be broad banded because the skills being bought are much the same over a range of positions.
When I worked at the City of Melbourne it was part of my role to go to every branch in the organisation and to listen to the ‘mission statements’ they had prepared. It soon became clear that these were virtually identical to each other and more or less interchangeable. So much so that from reading the mission statement alone you couldn’t tell if the branch was involved in Strategic Research or issuing parking fines. They always said something bland about customer service (despite local governments not really being in anything that could reasonably be called ‘customer service’ - any reasonable definition of which would include the fact that customer service requires the provision of different service leaves depending on the ability to pay). They always said something about excellence and something about commitment. Their mission statement might as well have said, “We’re not terribly sure what we do, but we will do it really well and in the best interests of those we do it for according to how we define their interests.” This was only surpassed by the ‘mission statement’ presented to us by management at the union – coming in at a mere two A4 pages of dot points it included just about everything the union was ever likely to do – proving yet again that morons aren’t limited to corporate bureaucracies.
She sums up my experience with the corporate world beautifully. “Think what characterises the really intelligent person. They can think for themselves. They love abstract ideas. They can look dispassionately at the facts. Humbug is their enemy. Dissent come easily to them, as does complexity. These are traits that are not only6 unnecessary for most business jobs, they are actually a handicap when it comes to raising through the ranks of large companies.” (Quoted from Lucy Kellaway ‘Companies Don’t Need Brainy People’)
She also has got me to buy a book called The Cult of Personality: How Personality Tests Are Leading Us to Miseducate Our Children, Mismanage Our Companies, and Misunderstand Ourselves– which I’m hoping comes before I start uni as I really would like to read it sooner rather than later.
This is a fascinating book – one I enjoyed very much. There is something very sick about our society and the best way to see where the deeply sick and troubling parts of our society are is to watch where the victim is being blamed the most. As soon as you hear that it is your fault you are not employable, or have lost a limb in an OHS incident, or are simply too female to earn equal pay, or need to be stomped on as part of a war on drugs, or can’t marry who you want because a sky god really might get really upset – then perhaps what really needs to change isn’t the victim, but whatever is causing a victim to exist in the first place.
Over the last couple of decades I have been either employed in a corporation, a government corporation, a local government authority or a trade union reacting to the corporate nonsense that is so beautifully discussed in this book. One of the things that amuses me most about corporate capitalism is how incredibly seriously it takes itself. I’ve always seen workplaces as more or less dysfunctional families. There are members of all families that seem to have been born with a disproportionate sense of entitlement. Others never seem to get the rewards they deserve according to the contribution they make in keeping the peace or the trouble they prevent happening to everyone around them. There are the crazy uncles who seem to have an aversion to using soap and the sister who does virtually nothing but is still everyone’s favourite, even if no one can quite say why. The last eight years of my life were spent representing people faced with the really yucky side of the corporate world – the part where the people I was representing were being disciplined or threatened with the sack. It has been a journey into the hideous side of human nature, a place where people show their worst sides - some more gleefully than others.
The premise of this book is related to the only other of Barbara Ehrenreich’s books I’ve read – Nickel and Dimed: On (Not) Getting By in America. In that book Barbara joined the ranks of minimum wage earners and showed how hard they were expected to work and how little rewarded they were. But white collar people then told Barbara she should write a book about their experience – after all, they had done all the right things: finished their education, not gotten pregnant in their teens and sold their soul to the corporation – and yet they still ended up feeling decidedly ripped off.
Barbara decides to try to get a job in the corporate world – she tries for a year. What this book really is, is a book about the scary world of white collar unemployment and recruitment. There are proselytising Christians who think that unemployment is as good a time to become converted to Jesus as any other. There are would be gurus on how to become employed whose sole advice seems to be that you should network and dream big. I thought the best piece of advice came from Barbara herself, that when doing a web search for work you should avoid the word ‘job’ as this will lead to millions of sites that linked that word with with the words ‘hand’ and ‘head’. If you ever needed proof the internet was designed by boys...
The big lesson in her excursion into attempting to be employed in the corporate world is how insecure everyone is – and not just the poor bastards who end up out of a job, but also those anticipating a restructure or a downsizing event or right sizing or an exercise in focusing on a corporations key competencies or core business or whatever the latest phrase for sacking people is. That is - everybody!
Marx says in Wage-Labor and Capitalthat the alienation of labour is due to capitalism reducing all skills down so that every job becomes unskilled. White collar workers are facing that experience today too, I think.
One of the things I was involved with in my endless years as a trade union ratbag was reviewing position descriptions and job classification structures. These are written so as to ‘broad band’ jobs, but the jobs themselves can be broad banded because the skills being bought are much the same over a range of positions.
When I worked at the City of Melbourne it was part of my role to go to every branch in the organisation and to listen to the ‘mission statements’ they had prepared. It soon became clear that these were virtually identical to each other and more or less interchangeable. So much so that from reading the mission statement alone you couldn’t tell if the branch was involved in Strategic Research or issuing parking fines. They always said something bland about customer service (despite local governments not really being in anything that could reasonably be called ‘customer service’ - any reasonable definition of which would include the fact that customer service requires the provision of different service leaves depending on the ability to pay). They always said something about excellence and something about commitment. Their mission statement might as well have said, “We’re not terribly sure what we do, but we will do it really well and in the best interests of those we do it for according to how we define their interests.” This was only surpassed by the ‘mission statement’ presented to us by management at the union – coming in at a mere two A4 pages of dot points it included just about everything the union was ever likely to do – proving yet again that morons aren’t limited to corporate bureaucracies.
She sums up my experience with the corporate world beautifully. “Think what characterises the really intelligent person. They can think for themselves. They love abstract ideas. They can look dispassionately at the facts. Humbug is their enemy. Dissent come easily to them, as does complexity. These are traits that are not only6 unnecessary for most business jobs, they are actually a handicap when it comes to raising through the ranks of large companies.” (Quoted from Lucy Kellaway ‘Companies Don’t Need Brainy People’)
She also has got me to buy a book called The Cult of Personality: How Personality Tests Are Leading Us to Miseducate Our Children, Mismanage Our Companies, and Misunderstand Ourselves– which I’m hoping comes before I start uni as I really would like to read it sooner rather than later.
This is a fascinating book – one I enjoyed very much. There is something very sick about our society and the best way to see where the deeply sick and troubling parts of our society are is to watch where the victim is being blamed the most. As soon as you hear that it is your fault you are not employable, or have lost a limb in an OHS incident, or are simply too female to earn equal pay, or need to be stomped on as part of a war on drugs, or can’t marry who you want because a sky god really might get really upset – then perhaps what really needs to change isn’t the victim, but whatever is causing a victim to exist in the first place.
August 11, 2008
OK, so it may be that the blue and pink collar work force is easier to love than middle management. It may be that the real heroism in this country is found closer to the poverty line then to middle management. Certainly, it is clear that Barbara Ehrenreich believes this to be true. A comparison of Bait and Switch with her earlier Nickel and Dimed demonstrated that while Ehrenreich finds much to lament in the plight of the working class, she generally finds the corporate world laughable and the white collar unemployed closer to pathetic than tragic. Perhaps these are defensible stances, but not when you present yourself, which she shamelessly and unironically does at one point, as deeply compassionate and empathetic, or as the scholarly investigative writer she equally believes herself to represent.
I am always at least a bit put off by investigative writers and documentarians who put themselves at the heart of the story they tell. While it may be necessary to assume a disguise when penetrating a secretive organization or particularly shadowy corporation, surely at least some of the middle class unemployed are not unwilling to speak frankly about their experiences and expectations. Why would stories told in the real voices of the unemployed be less compelling or insightful than Ehrenreich's own? But, putting this initial, and only slight objection aside (it is fun, after all, to read the narrative of a complete outsider penetrating a new world, even if not entirely convincing) my major objection to this book is how callously Ehrenreich dismisses the unemployed workers she interacts with as automatons and gullible fools. Ehrenreich’s time spent among job coaches and consultants as an ersatz job seeker causes her to deride the industry as filled with “victim blamers” who cause the unemployed to question their own self worth rather than external forces like the market and unethical corporations that might be equally culpable.
However, more subtly but equally insidiously, Ehrenreich spends much of the book engaging in equally cold victim blaming: after all, she implies, only the truly stupid and unaware would fall into obvious traps like image consulting and faith-based networking when looking for a new position. Unlike the working class, Ehrenreich seems to suggest, these people should know better. Of course, she never stops to consider that many job seekers likely don’t go the route she takes when looking for a new position. I have known a few of the unemployed middle class, at least one of whom was recently without work for more than a year, and none used the myriad methods Ehrenreich so condescendingly employs. But more importantly, are those who do use such methods really to be mocked rather than pitied? Desperation makes even very smart, very capable people fall pray to illogical behavior. Surely this is a demonstration of how much these people want to find employment, not of their congenital stupidity.
But by far the most egregious assumption made by Ehrenreich is that she is not only utterly qualified for a corporate position, but that she is over-qualified. I noticed a similar, although slightly less pervasive, suggestion in Nickel and Dimed. In that book, she mentions that nobody who interviewed or hired her ever commented on her education or that she was a writer. Gee. I’ve known someone with three degrees, two of them Master’s, and two very prestigious schools on her resume who spent the past year working at a minimum wage job in Chicago because nobody wants an historian or an English professor. Maybe the reason nobody hiring Ehrenreich asked about her qualifications is because they see it all the time, and it says absolutely nothing for the applicant’s ability to clean toilets or fold shirts. In this newer book, Ehrenreich is even more insulting. She seems to think that people should be lining up to hire someone with her not very impressive sounding and MADE UP credentials. Can’t imagine why nobody jumped at the opportunity presented there. I wonder how she would react to a typical corporate-type who showed up at her door, insisted they were qualified to be a co-author on her next project, and then provided a falsified resume to strengthen their assertion. Surely, she would explain the many hours, even years, which went into honing her craft. She would talk about training and education, the commitment needed to get up every day and write a book. But, she thinks so little of the profession she attempts to enter that she assumes her skills are not only transferable, but better than.
Alright, admittedly, this is a really long review and diatribe. And all this being said, I do think there is a great deal in the corporate world that should be changed. I agree with Ehrenreich that we should be marching for health care coverage, and to remove more bias from the workplace. The state of the unemployed from all walks of life is lamentable, and I hope never to find myself back in the grind of job-hunting or working in the corporate world, either as a member of middle management or a blue-collar worker. But, I also think that the academic and non-profit worlds are generally out of touch and condescending. I find it hypocritical to assume that anyone with half a brain, or a conscience, would follow the same path you yourself have taken. There are good people who end up corporate managers, born-again Christians, and Republicans. Really. And if Ehrenreich has no empathy for the middle class, she shouldn’t write about them while professing something else entirely.
I am always at least a bit put off by investigative writers and documentarians who put themselves at the heart of the story they tell. While it may be necessary to assume a disguise when penetrating a secretive organization or particularly shadowy corporation, surely at least some of the middle class unemployed are not unwilling to speak frankly about their experiences and expectations. Why would stories told in the real voices of the unemployed be less compelling or insightful than Ehrenreich's own? But, putting this initial, and only slight objection aside (it is fun, after all, to read the narrative of a complete outsider penetrating a new world, even if not entirely convincing) my major objection to this book is how callously Ehrenreich dismisses the unemployed workers she interacts with as automatons and gullible fools. Ehrenreich’s time spent among job coaches and consultants as an ersatz job seeker causes her to deride the industry as filled with “victim blamers” who cause the unemployed to question their own self worth rather than external forces like the market and unethical corporations that might be equally culpable.
However, more subtly but equally insidiously, Ehrenreich spends much of the book engaging in equally cold victim blaming: after all, she implies, only the truly stupid and unaware would fall into obvious traps like image consulting and faith-based networking when looking for a new position. Unlike the working class, Ehrenreich seems to suggest, these people should know better. Of course, she never stops to consider that many job seekers likely don’t go the route she takes when looking for a new position. I have known a few of the unemployed middle class, at least one of whom was recently without work for more than a year, and none used the myriad methods Ehrenreich so condescendingly employs. But more importantly, are those who do use such methods really to be mocked rather than pitied? Desperation makes even very smart, very capable people fall pray to illogical behavior. Surely this is a demonstration of how much these people want to find employment, not of their congenital stupidity.
But by far the most egregious assumption made by Ehrenreich is that she is not only utterly qualified for a corporate position, but that she is over-qualified. I noticed a similar, although slightly less pervasive, suggestion in Nickel and Dimed. In that book, she mentions that nobody who interviewed or hired her ever commented on her education or that she was a writer. Gee. I’ve known someone with three degrees, two of them Master’s, and two very prestigious schools on her resume who spent the past year working at a minimum wage job in Chicago because nobody wants an historian or an English professor. Maybe the reason nobody hiring Ehrenreich asked about her qualifications is because they see it all the time, and it says absolutely nothing for the applicant’s ability to clean toilets or fold shirts. In this newer book, Ehrenreich is even more insulting. She seems to think that people should be lining up to hire someone with her not very impressive sounding and MADE UP credentials. Can’t imagine why nobody jumped at the opportunity presented there. I wonder how she would react to a typical corporate-type who showed up at her door, insisted they were qualified to be a co-author on her next project, and then provided a falsified resume to strengthen their assertion. Surely, she would explain the many hours, even years, which went into honing her craft. She would talk about training and education, the commitment needed to get up every day and write a book. But, she thinks so little of the profession she attempts to enter that she assumes her skills are not only transferable, but better than.
Alright, admittedly, this is a really long review and diatribe. And all this being said, I do think there is a great deal in the corporate world that should be changed. I agree with Ehrenreich that we should be marching for health care coverage, and to remove more bias from the workplace. The state of the unemployed from all walks of life is lamentable, and I hope never to find myself back in the grind of job-hunting or working in the corporate world, either as a member of middle management or a blue-collar worker. But, I also think that the academic and non-profit worlds are generally out of touch and condescending. I find it hypocritical to assume that anyone with half a brain, or a conscience, would follow the same path you yourself have taken. There are good people who end up corporate managers, born-again Christians, and Republicans. Really. And if Ehrenreich has no empathy for the middle class, she shouldn’t write about them while professing something else entirely.
May 17, 2018
I don't really understand all of the vitriol that some of the other reviewer's are expressing about this book. I withheld two stars because I felt that overall she "touched" on the investigative journalism rather than threw herself into it, and it wasn't her most passionate work.
That being said, I have to say as a former job seeker (during the 2009 California recession), this book and it's assertions are right on the money. Ehrenreich details the struggle that middle class, otherwise well equipped job candidates have to face in getting any sort of employment. She jumped through the hoops that the increasingly desperate job seekers are forced to jump through these days--career coaches, seminars, resume building, and what have you.
The end result and main point I gleaned from the story--a white collar job seeker with totally decent credentials (college degree, certifications, clean history, etc) is going to face an uphill battle and likely PAY money in the form of seminars and preparation just to have a fighting chance looking for any kind of job. Our economy is really in the toilet when you have to shell out funds you don't have just to possibly get a job, and I've been there--paying several hundred dollars childcare a month just so I can be on standby to possibly work a temp job for $100. Is it logical at all? Absolutely not; that is why I quit looking, moved on, and (thank God) had family to support me in trying to achieve a career another way.
Perhaps most harrowing of all are the questions this book doesn't ask--if a decent, graduated candidate can have this kind of trouble finding a job, what chance at all does a former convict or mentally ill person hoping to clean up their act and support themselves have? There is no good answer for this. Some realities are inherently harsh, and can't be left on a positive note.
That being said, I have to say as a former job seeker (during the 2009 California recession), this book and it's assertions are right on the money. Ehrenreich details the struggle that middle class, otherwise well equipped job candidates have to face in getting any sort of employment. She jumped through the hoops that the increasingly desperate job seekers are forced to jump through these days--career coaches, seminars, resume building, and what have you.
The end result and main point I gleaned from the story--a white collar job seeker with totally decent credentials (college degree, certifications, clean history, etc) is going to face an uphill battle and likely PAY money in the form of seminars and preparation just to have a fighting chance looking for any kind of job. Our economy is really in the toilet when you have to shell out funds you don't have just to possibly get a job, and I've been there--paying several hundred dollars childcare a month just so I can be on standby to possibly work a temp job for $100. Is it logical at all? Absolutely not; that is why I quit looking, moved on, and (thank God) had family to support me in trying to achieve a career another way.
Perhaps most harrowing of all are the questions this book doesn't ask--if a decent, graduated candidate can have this kind of trouble finding a job, what chance at all does a former convict or mentally ill person hoping to clean up their act and support themselves have? There is no good answer for this. Some realities are inherently harsh, and can't be left on a positive note.
August 31, 2007
While I didn't agree with all of the points raised in Nickel & Dimed, I enjoyed it. I wish I could say the same for this book. Maybe I took things a bit too personally but working in public relations I was insulted that Barbara thinks she can easily step into a director's position in PR with a made up resume and absolutely no contacts in the industry. But she approaches every "adventure" in job searching with snobbish disdain. I agree that it's hard for people to find jobs in America and especially once you hit a certain age and level in your career but I feel that the book would have had more of an effect if she'd just followed the struggles of one of the many people she met along her journey instead of creating her own troubles. Plus, while there are numerous legitimate and free networking/job coaching services out there, she seemed to take part in the sketchier ones that require a financial investment and no guaranteed pay-off. The whole thing just left a bad taste in my mouth and overshadowed the real problems that people in this situation face.
July 11, 2015
"Barbara Ehrenreich is our premier reporter of the underside of capitalism." --Dorothy Gallagher, The New York Times Book Review
From the introduction:
"Stories of white-collar downward mobility cannot be brushed off as easily as accounts of blue-collar economic woes, which the hard-hearted traditionally blame on "bad choices": failing to get a college degree, for example, failing to postpone childbearing until acquiring a nest egg, or failing to choose affluent parents in the first place. But distressed white-collar people cannot be accused of fecklessness of any kind; they are the ones who "did everything right." They earned higher degrees, often setting aside their youthful passion for philosophy or music to suffer through dull practical majors like management or finance. In some cases, they were high achievers who ran into trouble precisely because they had risen far enough in the company for their salaries to look like a tempting cost cut. They were the losers, in other words, in a classic game of bait and switch. And while blue-collar poverty has become numbingly routine, white-collar unemployment--and the poverty that often results--remains a rude finger in the face of the American dream."
From the introduction:
"Stories of white-collar downward mobility cannot be brushed off as easily as accounts of blue-collar economic woes, which the hard-hearted traditionally blame on "bad choices": failing to get a college degree, for example, failing to postpone childbearing until acquiring a nest egg, or failing to choose affluent parents in the first place. But distressed white-collar people cannot be accused of fecklessness of any kind; they are the ones who "did everything right." They earned higher degrees, often setting aside their youthful passion for philosophy or music to suffer through dull practical majors like management or finance. In some cases, they were high achievers who ran into trouble precisely because they had risen far enough in the company for their salaries to look like a tempting cost cut. They were the losers, in other words, in a classic game of bait and switch. And while blue-collar poverty has become numbingly routine, white-collar unemployment--and the poverty that often results--remains a rude finger in the face of the American dream."
October 2, 2007
Ehrenreich posits that, no matter your education or previous track record of success in the white collar world, you are not assured of a stable economic future.
While her premise is correct, it is neither groundbreaking nor well-presented. Many of the sources cited in the book are 10 or more years old, indicating that the reality of the increasingly “downwardly mobile” economy is one with deep roots. Yet this work is surprisingly shallow in its views.
Undercover, trying to break into the corporate world, Ms. Ehrenreich takes us along on networking, “workshopping” and consulting excursions (though much of the consulting requires only phone contact, so “excursion” is a bit of a stretch). In every scenario she is exhorted to be “upbeat.” The constant emphasis on maintaining a winning attitude even in the most dire of circumstances devolves into a flat-out denial of reality. The question, unasked in this book, is: who is served by the denial of reality?
The undercover tactic which worked wonderfully in Nickel and Dimed does not serve so well here, in large part due to the author’s surface treatment of the subject. Though she states on page 2 that “stories of white collar downward mobility cannot be brushed off as easily as accounts of blue collar economic woes,” she has done a good job of doing just that.
Though most of her networking meetings and seminars are well-attended, the reader gets scant more than stereotyped descriptions of Ehrenreich’s fellow jobseekers. She makes superficial appraisals of them, without talking to them at any length. While this is ostensibly to avoid being caught out in her disguise, one feels that Ehrenreich wants to avoid looking too closely at the economic problems these people face and what it says about the system as a whole.
Along the way, the author frequently says she “is outraged,” but seems unable to express what is so outrageous to her. Is it the exorbitant fees demanded by “consultants”? The endless hours spent alone searching online for a job? The nattering about “attitude”? Perhaps she is outraged that she feels unable to connect with her fellow jobseekers. It is not until the last chapter that they are given a chance to voice their concerns. Even then, they are kept at a distance and their words are limited to excerpted paragraphs. There are no conversations presented, and a lack of human context. It is as if the author is tired of her subject and the subjects of her study.
She ends with a call to the unemployed to organize and get involved to lobby for improvements. These calls avoid the need for systemic change while perpetuating the blame-the-victim attitude which Ehrenreich claims to deplore, saying in effect, “If you would just pay more attention and get involved, we would not be here now.”
A serious approach to these issues would require confronting the incompatibility of unrestrained global capitalist competition with the maintenance of the basic needs of the working class, white or blue collar. Similarly, one would have to address why the Democratic Party has abandoned any association with social reformism.
Ehrenreich does none of this. The author is unable to look beyond her narrow reformist perspective and see that what is needed is not lobbying to patch up a dying monster, but an independent political movement of the working class against the system as a whole.
While her premise is correct, it is neither groundbreaking nor well-presented. Many of the sources cited in the book are 10 or more years old, indicating that the reality of the increasingly “downwardly mobile” economy is one with deep roots. Yet this work is surprisingly shallow in its views.
Undercover, trying to break into the corporate world, Ms. Ehrenreich takes us along on networking, “workshopping” and consulting excursions (though much of the consulting requires only phone contact, so “excursion” is a bit of a stretch). In every scenario she is exhorted to be “upbeat.” The constant emphasis on maintaining a winning attitude even in the most dire of circumstances devolves into a flat-out denial of reality. The question, unasked in this book, is: who is served by the denial of reality?
The undercover tactic which worked wonderfully in Nickel and Dimed does not serve so well here, in large part due to the author’s surface treatment of the subject. Though she states on page 2 that “stories of white collar downward mobility cannot be brushed off as easily as accounts of blue collar economic woes,” she has done a good job of doing just that.
Though most of her networking meetings and seminars are well-attended, the reader gets scant more than stereotyped descriptions of Ehrenreich’s fellow jobseekers. She makes superficial appraisals of them, without talking to them at any length. While this is ostensibly to avoid being caught out in her disguise, one feels that Ehrenreich wants to avoid looking too closely at the economic problems these people face and what it says about the system as a whole.
Along the way, the author frequently says she “is outraged,” but seems unable to express what is so outrageous to her. Is it the exorbitant fees demanded by “consultants”? The endless hours spent alone searching online for a job? The nattering about “attitude”? Perhaps she is outraged that she feels unable to connect with her fellow jobseekers. It is not until the last chapter that they are given a chance to voice their concerns. Even then, they are kept at a distance and their words are limited to excerpted paragraphs. There are no conversations presented, and a lack of human context. It is as if the author is tired of her subject and the subjects of her study.
She ends with a call to the unemployed to organize and get involved to lobby for improvements. These calls avoid the need for systemic change while perpetuating the blame-the-victim attitude which Ehrenreich claims to deplore, saying in effect, “If you would just pay more attention and get involved, we would not be here now.”
A serious approach to these issues would require confronting the incompatibility of unrestrained global capitalist competition with the maintenance of the basic needs of the working class, white or blue collar. Similarly, one would have to address why the Democratic Party has abandoned any association with social reformism.
Ehrenreich does none of this. The author is unable to look beyond her narrow reformist perspective and see that what is needed is not lobbying to patch up a dying monster, but an independent political movement of the working class against the system as a whole.
November 23, 2007
From a blog post I wrote in 2006:
I was looking forward to reading Barbara Ehrenreich's latest tome, Bait and Switch: The (Futile) Pursuit of the American Dream. I really enjoyed Nickel and Dimed in which the author took on several minimum wage type jobs and tried to live on her salary. Her latest effort is a look at what the white collar folks go through when they get laid off/fired from their relatively high paying jobs.
It wasn't the story I thought it would be. I expected her to go through several forays into the craziness that is Corporate America and describe it from the perspective of the free wheeling academic. That world is so illogical and frustrating, I thought it would make a great story.
Instead, the book was all about just trying to get a job in the white collar world. She employed a resume expert, job coach, had a personal makeover and attended several workshops and networking group meetings to help her land a job. In one year, she was only offered a job selling insurance at Aflac (without benefits?!?) and one becoming a Mary Kay Rep.
However, I think her effort was flawed in several ways. She didn't entirely fib her work history, but she had several gaps and tried to portray herself as a contractor type with speech writing and meeting planning experience. Originally, she set her sights on an Executive PR job which no one would have given her with her purported work history. She then tried to find a lower position but I never felt like she focused on anything realistic.
There were several anecdotes about people who were involved (without success) in long term job searches but none about people who actually found a job comparable to the one they left. Did she just not encounter any or did she not report any? I don't know.
We read this as a book club selection and no one in our group dug it very much, mostly for the same reasons I didn't.
I was looking forward to reading Barbara Ehrenreich's latest tome, Bait and Switch: The (Futile) Pursuit of the American Dream. I really enjoyed Nickel and Dimed in which the author took on several minimum wage type jobs and tried to live on her salary. Her latest effort is a look at what the white collar folks go through when they get laid off/fired from their relatively high paying jobs.
It wasn't the story I thought it would be. I expected her to go through several forays into the craziness that is Corporate America and describe it from the perspective of the free wheeling academic. That world is so illogical and frustrating, I thought it would make a great story.
Instead, the book was all about just trying to get a job in the white collar world. She employed a resume expert, job coach, had a personal makeover and attended several workshops and networking group meetings to help her land a job. In one year, she was only offered a job selling insurance at Aflac (without benefits?!?) and one becoming a Mary Kay Rep.
However, I think her effort was flawed in several ways. She didn't entirely fib her work history, but she had several gaps and tried to portray herself as a contractor type with speech writing and meeting planning experience. Originally, she set her sights on an Executive PR job which no one would have given her with her purported work history. She then tried to find a lower position but I never felt like she focused on anything realistic.
There were several anecdotes about people who were involved (without success) in long term job searches but none about people who actually found a job comparable to the one they left. Did she just not encounter any or did she not report any? I don't know.
We read this as a book club selection and no one in our group dug it very much, mostly for the same reasons I didn't.
April 13, 2013
Although this book was published in 2005, I didn't read it until 2010. If I had read it in 2005, I might not have related to it so intensely, as I did in 2009 when I was laid off for the first time. I would get laid off twice more before landing stable employment again in 2012. Back in 2005 I was smug, fully insulated from the severity of unemployment, never having been out of a job since I got my first part-time job at 16, working at the mall. This turned into paid internships at prestigious accounting firms while I was in University, and a great job as a financial analyst upon graduation. This was followed by promotions, raises, more and more benefits, and exciting career changes before it all came to a halt in the wake of the Great Recession. Ehrenreich's portrayal of looking for 'white collar' work after any kind of life change - maternity leave, a lay-off, your company going bust, even just being in your 50s! - is spot on. Not only does she expose the entirely new industry that sprang up in the wake of mass "right-sizing" and economic re-organization - phony career-coaches, resume consulting firms, "image" experts and expensive job hunting 'boot camps' - she also delves into the devastating emotional toll an experience like this can take on people - even on her, when this was supposed to be just research for a book!
Very sobering, and very true. Especially for those who think this can never happen to them.
Very sobering, and very true. Especially for those who think this can never happen to them.
December 13, 2007
Why do I do this to myself? I feel this guilt that requires me to finish a book, even when doing so makes my blood pressure skyrocket. I wasn't a big fan of Nickel and Dimed, so why would I think it'd be any different when Ehrenreich is piously judging the middle class?
In short, the author "goes undercover" to try to land a middle class executive PR job, with a minimum salary of $50,000. She creates a somewhat fictitious resume - she has a background in "event planning" and was a PR consultant until taking thirteen years off as a homemaker. Does she really think that she can go with basically no experience to a $50K executive job? Nonetheless, she spends almost $6,000 on career coaches and image makeover consultants. What middle class person out of work would spend $6,000 on something like that?
She goes to networking groups that take places in churches - and then rants and raves that the group starts the meeting with prayer. Really, what did she expect?
In short, the author "goes undercover" to try to land a middle class executive PR job, with a minimum salary of $50,000. She creates a somewhat fictitious resume - she has a background in "event planning" and was a PR consultant until taking thirteen years off as a homemaker. Does she really think that she can go with basically no experience to a $50K executive job? Nonetheless, she spends almost $6,000 on career coaches and image makeover consultants. What middle class person out of work would spend $6,000 on something like that?
She goes to networking groups that take places in churches - and then rants and raves that the group starts the meeting with prayer. Really, what did she expect?
May 18, 2012
I had originally intended on writing my master's thesis on the futility of the American Dream in an era of economic uncertainty (this was a couple years before the Great Recession) and picked this book up in the process of conducting research. I cite many of the studies referenced in the book often. Barbara Ehrenreich is a terrific writer - she makes my blood boil simply by explaining the basic workings of our socio-economic system and makes me laugh a few paragraphs later. This is not as good as 'Nickel and Dimed', but it's still pretty damn good.
April 2, 2010
Barbara Ehrenreich in this book explores the scary world of white collar unemployment and the “transition industry.” That is a euphemism for the business of helping white collar job seekers. It’s a world of job coaches, head hunters, job seminars, job seeker boot camps, job fairs, and Christian support groups for job seekers (some taking the opportunity to proselytize). She describes passing encounters with sham job offers that advertise “being your own boss” or “get rich quick.” At one point she is offered a job where she is to work on a commission basis in sales for a large insurance company for no salary, no office space, and no benefits (and she is to provide her own computer and pay for books and training). She also views with a jaundiced eye some of the tools used by the “network and dream big” motivational gurus. In particular she takes a couple swipes at their use of personality tests under the pretense of helping to find the right job.
This book is about people who did everything right and find that the American dream didn’t work for them. They went to college, didn’t get pregnant at a young age, and obtained the degrees and credentials that are supposed to provide a ticket to the middle class. Many of them at one time were progressing successfully in their careers when they were “downsized” (i.e. laid off). Ironically, the highly successful were sometimes the first to be let go because of their higher wages. Then they found that finding another job difficult, and sometimes impossible. Thus many are now joining the flow of the downwardly mobile. This book was written in 2005 prior to the latest world-wide economic downturn. Conditions described in this book can only have gotten worse since then. Many in this book were victims of the dot-com bubble (i.e. many I.T. types). Presumably now many would be victims of the real estate and finance collapse. Come to think of it, there are probably quite a few unemployed journalists too.
The last chapter of the book zeros in on the nature of the problem as a whole. Everybody in the “transition industry” encourages positive thinking and being an enthusiastic participant in the expectations of corporate culture. Then in return, corporate culture gives zero loyalty to its workers. Many white collar workers in today’s environment are simply stripped of their dignity.
“...white-collar corporate workers lack....dignity. The white-collar corporate employee...must sell--not just his skill and hard work--but himself. ... His is a world of intrigue and ill-defined expectations, of manipulation and mind games, where self presentation--as in “personality” and “attitude”--regularly outweighs performance.”
The role of unions has been to protect workers. But unions are losing influence, and generally don’t represent white collar professions. Some professions are protected by barriers that limit the number who may enter their profession (e.g. State licensing of medical doctors, nurses, accountants, engineers, teachers and lawyers). These barriers provide some protection from lesser trained completion. However, in the case of management, human relations, marketing, and PR, anyone with a college degree can present themselves as a potential practitioner. And with this openness comes a huge vulnerability for the veterans in the field.
The book’s cynical appraisal of the “transition industry” that feeds off the plight of the white collar unemployed fits well with my own negative views on the subject. It’s obvious that job seekers need assistance, help and encouragement. Being charged fees for services of questionable value is the last thing needed. The book acknowledges that many job fairs, which are aimed primarily at blue collar employment, are usually provided at no cost.
Barbara Ehrenreich is a good writer and is able to make this discouraging commentary of American life an interesting, and at times humorous, reading experience. I recommend this review of the book by Trevor.
This book is about people who did everything right and find that the American dream didn’t work for them. They went to college, didn’t get pregnant at a young age, and obtained the degrees and credentials that are supposed to provide a ticket to the middle class. Many of them at one time were progressing successfully in their careers when they were “downsized” (i.e. laid off). Ironically, the highly successful were sometimes the first to be let go because of their higher wages. Then they found that finding another job difficult, and sometimes impossible. Thus many are now joining the flow of the downwardly mobile. This book was written in 2005 prior to the latest world-wide economic downturn. Conditions described in this book can only have gotten worse since then. Many in this book were victims of the dot-com bubble (i.e. many I.T. types). Presumably now many would be victims of the real estate and finance collapse. Come to think of it, there are probably quite a few unemployed journalists too.
The last chapter of the book zeros in on the nature of the problem as a whole. Everybody in the “transition industry” encourages positive thinking and being an enthusiastic participant in the expectations of corporate culture. Then in return, corporate culture gives zero loyalty to its workers. Many white collar workers in today’s environment are simply stripped of their dignity.
“...white-collar corporate workers lack....dignity. The white-collar corporate employee...must sell--not just his skill and hard work--but himself. ... His is a world of intrigue and ill-defined expectations, of manipulation and mind games, where self presentation--as in “personality” and “attitude”--regularly outweighs performance.”
The role of unions has been to protect workers. But unions are losing influence, and generally don’t represent white collar professions. Some professions are protected by barriers that limit the number who may enter their profession (e.g. State licensing of medical doctors, nurses, accountants, engineers, teachers and lawyers). These barriers provide some protection from lesser trained completion. However, in the case of management, human relations, marketing, and PR, anyone with a college degree can present themselves as a potential practitioner. And with this openness comes a huge vulnerability for the veterans in the field.
The book’s cynical appraisal of the “transition industry” that feeds off the plight of the white collar unemployed fits well with my own negative views on the subject. It’s obvious that job seekers need assistance, help and encouragement. Being charged fees for services of questionable value is the last thing needed. The book acknowledges that many job fairs, which are aimed primarily at blue collar employment, are usually provided at no cost.
Barbara Ehrenreich is a good writer and is able to make this discouraging commentary of American life an interesting, and at times humorous, reading experience. I recommend this review of the book by Trevor.
August 25, 2017
According to the book’s introduction, Ehrenreich decided to investigate the claim that white collar, mid-level employees were exploited by their employers and the corporate culture. As she did with entry level work in Nickeled and Dimed, she set out to infiltrate this world as an undercover journalist by getting this type of job. However, with a falsified resume designed to hide her identity, she spends the entire book in the job search process. The tone of this book is not that of an objective journalist, but is snarky, that of an activist mocking her target. She ridicules the haircut of the presenters and the religious language of those at a church-based event, the food and wall art at various venues hosting seminars and the photo of a company founder, the use of personality profile tools by job coaches and the synchronized gum chewing of women at a recruiting booth. In the conclusion of this book, she finds sufficient evidence of this soul-crushing exploitative corporate culture in her inability to land a job in public relations. This is my second book by this so-called journalist and my last. Bait and Switch is the perfect title for this book. I was told I would get an intelligent, critical examination of corporate culture and received a self-serving pile of snark.
December 13, 2008
This book was frightening. I think every high school student should have to read part of it. The life coaches were particularly frightening. It seems especially appropriate right now.
December 1, 2023
This was a good examination of how the corporate unemployed world looks feels and operates, but failed to reach the scope I believe the author set out to uncover about the white collar workforce more broadly.
Ehrenreich misses out on an element of breath to her analysis by centering her own experience. This would have felt like an acceptable trade off if her experiences were of genuine unemployment, but the fact she was mostly cosplaying unemployment (doing a great job of it, but still lacking the stakes and as a consequence some of the more weighty emotional insight) meant the lack of breath was not replaced with an equally worthwhile depth.
I found the main pretence of Ehrenreich pretending to be unemployed to be a little gimmicky, but did add some narrative and personalisation to what could otherwise have been quite dry. However it meant that Ehrenreich was for the most part only ever discussing the subjects she encountered in her undercover operation, rather than the most damning or interesting facets of the white collar world. Granted she did a great job of exploring what she did come across. She is witty at times and clearly a very insightful journalist. Her regular examination of the larger trends shaping the corporate unemployed word is constantly interesting. Her well thought out critiques of some of the nonsense masquerading as science and logic in the corporate world was also refreshing. I particularly enjoyed her discussions on the fallacies of corporate personality tests, and Christian unemployed culture.
The book felt startlingly relevant despite being almost 20 years old and focused in America. A reminder of how much the world is changing and how quickly the model corporate workforce is being dissolved into the world of short term hiring, high turn over and instability, and strained employee-employer relationships.
It is shame she never got hired as part of her experiment, as I was keen to read her thoughts about actual work environments, but given the thread this book was based around was her own attempt to find employment, her inability to do so meant we didn’t get access to her thoughts or research on the matter. She did utilise this set back to paint a very vivid and confronting image of how prevalent and painful unemployment (or underemployment) is for those experiencing it.
Well researched and rounded out with a great conclusion about how the bonds between individuals need to be strengthened to combat an increasingly hostile environment for the unemployed, and the employed alike, I can say this book is worth reading despite some flaws.
Ehrenreich misses out on an element of breath to her analysis by centering her own experience. This would have felt like an acceptable trade off if her experiences were of genuine unemployment, but the fact she was mostly cosplaying unemployment (doing a great job of it, but still lacking the stakes and as a consequence some of the more weighty emotional insight) meant the lack of breath was not replaced with an equally worthwhile depth.
I found the main pretence of Ehrenreich pretending to be unemployed to be a little gimmicky, but did add some narrative and personalisation to what could otherwise have been quite dry. However it meant that Ehrenreich was for the most part only ever discussing the subjects she encountered in her undercover operation, rather than the most damning or interesting facets of the white collar world. Granted she did a great job of exploring what she did come across. She is witty at times and clearly a very insightful journalist. Her regular examination of the larger trends shaping the corporate unemployed word is constantly interesting. Her well thought out critiques of some of the nonsense masquerading as science and logic in the corporate world was also refreshing. I particularly enjoyed her discussions on the fallacies of corporate personality tests, and Christian unemployed culture.
The book felt startlingly relevant despite being almost 20 years old and focused in America. A reminder of how much the world is changing and how quickly the model corporate workforce is being dissolved into the world of short term hiring, high turn over and instability, and strained employee-employer relationships.
It is shame she never got hired as part of her experiment, as I was keen to read her thoughts about actual work environments, but given the thread this book was based around was her own attempt to find employment, her inability to do so meant we didn’t get access to her thoughts or research on the matter. She did utilise this set back to paint a very vivid and confronting image of how prevalent and painful unemployment (or underemployment) is for those experiencing it.
Well researched and rounded out with a great conclusion about how the bonds between individuals need to be strengthened to combat an increasingly hostile environment for the unemployed, and the employed alike, I can say this book is worth reading despite some flaws.
November 8, 2014
Not so certain why people reaect negatively to this book. Having been through the white-collar lay-off process (and I choose to say "lay off" instead of "in transition" since it is more honest), I have to agree with Ehrenreich. The advice given by career coaches is generally silly EST-like pop psychology. And by focusing on flaws in you -- appearance, body language, resume, etc -- we get distracted from the true costs that outsourcing has had on American culture.
The rich get richer, and the poor get poorer. For those in the middle, the squeeze is on.
I did have to detract for some down-right meanness. Like how Ehrenreich brow-beats a defenseless, spent, fragile job coach who, no doubt, just wanted to help people. But she is penetrating about the reality of corporate life, and the back-stabbing ethic it instills. Since people are afraid of losing their jobs.
I don't claim to know the answer -- nor does Erinreich But we really should look to countries who treat their people better -- Sweden, Finland, Germany and Japan for instance -- and yet have thriving economies than falling for the same old Tax Cut rhetoric that has become all too common in the USA.
Thought-provoking and well written.
The rich get richer, and the poor get poorer. For those in the middle, the squeeze is on.
I did have to detract for some down-right meanness. Like how Ehrenreich brow-beats a defenseless, spent, fragile job coach who, no doubt, just wanted to help people. But she is penetrating about the reality of corporate life, and the back-stabbing ethic it instills. Since people are afraid of losing their jobs.
I don't claim to know the answer -- nor does Erinreich But we really should look to countries who treat their people better -- Sweden, Finland, Germany and Japan for instance -- and yet have thriving economies than falling for the same old Tax Cut rhetoric that has become all too common in the USA.
Thought-provoking and well written.
February 22, 2010
Ehrenreich missed the mark with this book. She went out to try to nab a job in mid management with a fake resume and just never made it. She enlisted career advisors, and went to job fairs and spent tons of money with no results. The basic issue here is that she didn't have the 20 or so years of experience, of friends in the business and contacts in her trade to give her a boost. She spent a good part of the book being cynical about the many people and places she enlisted to help her in her search. I really don't think most people do this. In the end I think she would have done better shadowing 3 or 4 people who have lost their jobs and truly analyzing their situations completely, instead of trying to masquerade as something she wasn't. I got the feeling that she had a contract with the editor and couldn't change it once she had started off on the wrong path, so she just made the best of it, which did not make for good reading.
August 12, 2008
This was exasperating and sad. The author (who wrote Nickel and Dimed) goes undercover to research what it is like to be a white collar worker who loses his/her job and needs to find another one. It's funny sometimes to see how the corporate world lives and what it believes and the games that people play (use the correct buzz words, know the right people), but it also makes me so mad. Obtaining a good education and working hard are not enough. It was also interesting to see all the "coaches" out there who are willing to tell you how to dress, how to make the perfect resume, how to sell yourself, etc. - all for a fee. People are desperate so they do this! The book uncovers the middle class/upper middle class of work very well.
June 2, 2013
While the previous book, "Nickel & Dimed", was revelatory and more significant piece of journalism, I can't say the same thing for "Bait and Switch." In pursuing her next book - she decides to pick a profession she knows little about and FAKE IT. She thinks so little of the corporate world that she thinks that they won't be able to tell. And then - she proceeds to pursue a whole lot of worthless job searching techniques that most unemployed people don't find useful.
On top of that - even as an Atheist myself - I find her heavy handed derision of the religiously oriented job seekers and their support groups just plain ugly - it doesn't help move along her book at all.
Let's face it: the economy was in really bad shape at the time she wrote this book. I was laid off in November 2000 and I couldn't get a job even with many years of solid web development and project management experience - there just weren't jobs out there. I went to ONE job fair and realized: nobody is getting a job out of this event. I spoke with a career counselor ONE time and realized: she's making money, I'm not. I could clean up people's resumes just as well as she's doing - she doesn't even understand the kind of jobs that I am seeking.
So, I pursued survival jobs - I got certified as a massage therapist, and then discovered that landing a job at a spa or gym was just as bad as any of those sales jobs with insurance companies. Not only do you not get benefits, but you only get a fraction of the hourly rate. I did freelance work out of my home - but despite advertising "strictly therapeutic massage" - even the most "nice" and family oriented male clients eventually hinted that they wanted a little more from their massage. Trying to get a non-corporate job was really hard - even taking off my college degrees from my resume and removing titles and extraneous responsibilities, only listing a job history and applicable skills.
It was pretty obvious that I wasn't some gum snapping college drop out who would take crap from a manager - and when the interviewer is less articulate than the interviewee, you can be guaranteed that the interviewer is moving on to the next applicant. I even got fired from an admin job after leaving to go to my stepfather's death bed because my manager had found my resume through some other online job board and told me that he was firing me because I "lied" on my resume by not including my MA in Latin American Studies (as though it would matter being an admin assistant in the facilities department of a hospital?)
No, Barbara would have been better off talking to people and doing a longitudinal study - leaving out her embarrassing attempts to land a PR job with completely bogus credentials. This book would have been
interesting if it had included more information about people and follow up with them (ie, expanding the "Conclusion") -- and maybe some more statistics.
The bottom line is: people are mostly sheep. People want to be told what to do when they run out of ideas on their own, and there are plenty of wolves in sheep's clothing who will tell them what they want to hear, whether it is a career counselor, job fair, or some "job" that requires the employee make an initial investment and provide her own benefits.
Companies used that first dot-bomb crisis, and the more recent economic recession, as a way to leverage themselves out of any kind of commitment or loyalty to employees. I haven't had a "perm" job in six years -- everyone wants to hire contractors. No retirement matching, no vacation pay, no insurance -- nada. On some levels, having been employed through the last recession, I have to wonder - call me a cynic if you will - whether these jobs crises are merely a mechanism controlled by corporate America to increasingly reduce job seeker & employee expectations of their (potential) employers.
Instead of keeping employees happy so they are loyal and do good work - the tables are turned. Employees have to walk on eggshells and figure out what to do to keep their employers happy, how to dress, behave and meet metrics to keep their jobs.
That's the real crisis -- how we, as a society, are accepting excuses from our government and our employers that increasing limit our options and keep us at a perpetual disadvantage that is not static but spiraling downward.
On top of that - even as an Atheist myself - I find her heavy handed derision of the religiously oriented job seekers and their support groups just plain ugly - it doesn't help move along her book at all.
Let's face it: the economy was in really bad shape at the time she wrote this book. I was laid off in November 2000 and I couldn't get a job even with many years of solid web development and project management experience - there just weren't jobs out there. I went to ONE job fair and realized: nobody is getting a job out of this event. I spoke with a career counselor ONE time and realized: she's making money, I'm not. I could clean up people's resumes just as well as she's doing - she doesn't even understand the kind of jobs that I am seeking.
So, I pursued survival jobs - I got certified as a massage therapist, and then discovered that landing a job at a spa or gym was just as bad as any of those sales jobs with insurance companies. Not only do you not get benefits, but you only get a fraction of the hourly rate. I did freelance work out of my home - but despite advertising "strictly therapeutic massage" - even the most "nice" and family oriented male clients eventually hinted that they wanted a little more from their massage. Trying to get a non-corporate job was really hard - even taking off my college degrees from my resume and removing titles and extraneous responsibilities, only listing a job history and applicable skills.
It was pretty obvious that I wasn't some gum snapping college drop out who would take crap from a manager - and when the interviewer is less articulate than the interviewee, you can be guaranteed that the interviewer is moving on to the next applicant. I even got fired from an admin job after leaving to go to my stepfather's death bed because my manager had found my resume through some other online job board and told me that he was firing me because I "lied" on my resume by not including my MA in Latin American Studies (as though it would matter being an admin assistant in the facilities department of a hospital?)
No, Barbara would have been better off talking to people and doing a longitudinal study - leaving out her embarrassing attempts to land a PR job with completely bogus credentials. This book would have been
interesting if it had included more information about people and follow up with them (ie, expanding the "Conclusion") -- and maybe some more statistics.
The bottom line is: people are mostly sheep. People want to be told what to do when they run out of ideas on their own, and there are plenty of wolves in sheep's clothing who will tell them what they want to hear, whether it is a career counselor, job fair, or some "job" that requires the employee make an initial investment and provide her own benefits.
Companies used that first dot-bomb crisis, and the more recent economic recession, as a way to leverage themselves out of any kind of commitment or loyalty to employees. I haven't had a "perm" job in six years -- everyone wants to hire contractors. No retirement matching, no vacation pay, no insurance -- nada. On some levels, having been employed through the last recession, I have to wonder - call me a cynic if you will - whether these jobs crises are merely a mechanism controlled by corporate America to increasingly reduce job seeker & employee expectations of their (potential) employers.
Instead of keeping employees happy so they are loyal and do good work - the tables are turned. Employees have to walk on eggshells and figure out what to do to keep their employers happy, how to dress, behave and meet metrics to keep their jobs.
That's the real crisis -- how we, as a society, are accepting excuses from our government and our employers that increasing limit our options and keep us at a perpetual disadvantage that is not static but spiraling downward.
April 24, 2018
journalist who went 'undercover' to see what life is like for white collar folks who find themselves out of work and searching. A sad reflection of the change from corporations that values long time employees and treated them 'as family' to the reality of business today.
October 9, 2011
I read this because Ehrenreich's earlier book, Nickel and Dimed, wasn't available from the library - but I thought a close examination of the issues of the US middle class would be equally interesting. Unfortunately, although that's the book Ehrenreich set out to write,it's not what this book turned out to be.
Ehrenreich started with the intention of a parallel structure to 'Nickle and Dimed' - she would masquerade as a unemployed white-collar PR professional, get corporate job, work there for several months and write about the experience. She picks a pseudonym, creates a resume, and hits the job boards. After a year of searching, she's had not one genuine interview, let alone a corporate job. So it's really a book about the horrors and indignities of the job search.
One of the problems with her approach is that the strictures of her false identity lead to an unrealism that seriously undermines the credibility of her narrative. She picks PR because it's close to her real job (journalism and writing), but she doesn't know the industry - so she spends time finding out the most basic facts about the career - what kind of companies hire PR specialists, what are the professional associations that might help, even the industry jargon. Since she's operating under a false identity, she can't use the real contacts she has, and of course the fictional clients she created can't help either. So her search is hard, discouraging and ultimately futile. Which is not exactly new insight.
In other spots, it seems like she deliberately makes choices that make for good copy but strike a false note. She pays for a few career coaches who spout nothing other than positive thinking, even though they strike her as irritating from the first meeting. She attends more than one fundamentalist Christian networking event even after she makes clear that she has severe doubts about mixing religion and commerce.
A bit like an epidemiological study, her exaggerated methods do lead to a few moments where I thought, yeah. But the most interesting part of the book is near the end when she gives up on her own search and interviews the fellow seekers she's met along the way. If she'd taken this approach from the beginning, with both employed and unemployed white collared professionals, she could have written a real picture of failures of the American dream for the middle class, rather than her ersatz foray into a strange foreign land.
Ehrenreich started with the intention of a parallel structure to 'Nickle and Dimed' - she would masquerade as a unemployed white-collar PR professional, get corporate job, work there for several months and write about the experience. She picks a pseudonym, creates a resume, and hits the job boards. After a year of searching, she's had not one genuine interview, let alone a corporate job. So it's really a book about the horrors and indignities of the job search.
One of the problems with her approach is that the strictures of her false identity lead to an unrealism that seriously undermines the credibility of her narrative. She picks PR because it's close to her real job (journalism and writing), but she doesn't know the industry - so she spends time finding out the most basic facts about the career - what kind of companies hire PR specialists, what are the professional associations that might help, even the industry jargon. Since she's operating under a false identity, she can't use the real contacts she has, and of course the fictional clients she created can't help either. So her search is hard, discouraging and ultimately futile. Which is not exactly new insight.
In other spots, it seems like she deliberately makes choices that make for good copy but strike a false note. She pays for a few career coaches who spout nothing other than positive thinking, even though they strike her as irritating from the first meeting. She attends more than one fundamentalist Christian networking event even after she makes clear that she has severe doubts about mixing religion and commerce.
A bit like an epidemiological study, her exaggerated methods do lead to a few moments where I thought, yeah. But the most interesting part of the book is near the end when she gives up on her own search and interviews the fellow seekers she's met along the way. If she'd taken this approach from the beginning, with both employed and unemployed white collared professionals, she could have written a real picture of failures of the American dream for the middle class, rather than her ersatz foray into a strange foreign land.
April 28, 2009
I read Nickel and Dimed when I was a low wage retail worker, so I thought it appropriate to read Bait and Switch now that I work in the corporate world. Although Ehrenreich doesn't accomplish what she set out to do (enter the corporate world as an employee), she offers a scary look at the nature of unemployment in the white collar world. However, I thought she spent a little too much time examining the world of 'career coaching' and not enough focusing on the plight of the unemployed white collar worker who has searched for months, been forced to take a 'survival' job, and generally feels a sense of despair. She devotes a couple of chapters and a conclusion to analyze this, but the majority of the book is focused on her meetings with career coaches and the sessions she attends under their guidance. One chapter would have been enough to tell the reader that, in general, these people offer no real help in the search to find a job and ultimately make their livings by taking advantage of the hopelessly unemployed.
June 16, 2008
This was boring and useless, hours of my life that I'll never have back again.
July 24, 2012
I've read Barbara Ehrenreich's Bait and Switch a few times, and have had different reactions to it each time I finish it.
This time around I found Ehrenreich to be excessively negative, shrill, and smug as she details her account of searching for a white-collar job amid the snake oil salesmen of professional coaches, resume-tweakers, image specialists and others who prey upon those who are unemployed or seeking better employment.
When I read it back in 2006, I'd just come off a year of unemployment and underemployment, working in the survival jobs she derides in her book and feeling much of the same emotion of which she writes. Then, I found her fairly true to life.
Why the difference?
Point of view, partially. Proximity to the pain. Distance from 2006 makes me wonder, however, if she focuses on the excessively negative experiences -- which we certainly have. She dismisses faith/luck/what have you and instead insists that organization and unionization are the key to stopping the hopelessness of the unemployed and underemployed. I've seen enough union folks lose their jobs over the past few years that I find these typically liberal homilies to sound hollow. She could have chosen to take positive looks at entrepreneurship, individuals seeking alternative education and even finding the positive in survival jobs -- we may all have to have them from time to time -- and thus balance the sense of crushing hopelessness she conveys in her book. But check in with me again if I lose my current job. I may change my mind again.
This time around I found Ehrenreich to be excessively negative, shrill, and smug as she details her account of searching for a white-collar job amid the snake oil salesmen of professional coaches, resume-tweakers, image specialists and others who prey upon those who are unemployed or seeking better employment.
When I read it back in 2006, I'd just come off a year of unemployment and underemployment, working in the survival jobs she derides in her book and feeling much of the same emotion of which she writes. Then, I found her fairly true to life.
Why the difference?
Point of view, partially. Proximity to the pain. Distance from 2006 makes me wonder, however, if she focuses on the excessively negative experiences -- which we certainly have. She dismisses faith/luck/what have you and instead insists that organization and unionization are the key to stopping the hopelessness of the unemployed and underemployed. I've seen enough union folks lose their jobs over the past few years that I find these typically liberal homilies to sound hollow. She could have chosen to take positive looks at entrepreneurship, individuals seeking alternative education and even finding the positive in survival jobs -- we may all have to have them from time to time -- and thus balance the sense of crushing hopelessness she conveys in her book. But check in with me again if I lose my current job. I may change my mind again.
August 27, 2014
This lesser companion piece to Ehrenreich's "Nickel and Dimed" can only be described as a book-length exercise in turning lemons into lemonade. Her intent was to go undercover as she did in her other book but sadly didn't get very far.
I feel like this book itself was a bit of a bait and switch because the cover seems to indicate that the author is going to uncover some truths about modern corporate culture. However the book turns out to be an extended job hunting narrative and an incomplete interpretation of corporate culture from the outside looking in.
I really like this author, her other book was terrific, but I felt a bit let down by this one. The only thing that saved this piece was the author's incredible wit and funny writing style. A fast and entertaining read, though a little skimpy on content.
I feel like this book itself was a bit of a bait and switch because the cover seems to indicate that the author is going to uncover some truths about modern corporate culture. However the book turns out to be an extended job hunting narrative and an incomplete interpretation of corporate culture from the outside looking in.
I really like this author, her other book was terrific, but I felt a bit let down by this one. The only thing that saved this piece was the author's incredible wit and funny writing style. A fast and entertaining read, though a little skimpy on content.
November 5, 2010
Ugh. This book was a whole lot of nothing. She did not take the project seriously or make a proper effort at getting a middle class sort of a job. To top it off, her tone was extremely smug. For someone clueless, she had no right to think she had it all figured out. It wasn't until the very end of her project, when I'm sure the book was due to her publishers, that she realized she may have made some serious mistakes along the way. I wish she'd started all over at that point and tried again and just let the book be late.
I am extremely disappointed.
I am extremely disappointed.
August 28, 2020
This is a dated but very hilarious book. Hearing about the poseurs who claim they will help you get a new job while blaming it all on you is pretty accurate and funny. I do disagree with her lumping est into the happy-talk self-empowerment groups. I did the est training six or seven times and got great value out of it each time. But there were lots of people that ripped off est that I think were the ones she encountered. Tell the truth; keep your agreements: Those are the most salient principles I remember from the est training.
Still, her observations about all the job-fair frauds and image-management people she dealt with were just a scream. The whole corporate schtick is pretty much a con. The definition of a corporation as a person is so wrong. What do you call employees, then? Mini-corporations? The only CEO I ever appreciated was the one who, when I told him I was writing a speech for him, said, "Well, I don't speak in complete sentences, so keep that in mind." He was a wonderful guy.
Still, her observations about all the job-fair frauds and image-management people she dealt with were just a scream. The whole corporate schtick is pretty much a con. The definition of a corporation as a person is so wrong. What do you call employees, then? Mini-corporations? The only CEO I ever appreciated was the one who, when I told him I was writing a speech for him, said, "Well, I don't speak in complete sentences, so keep that in mind." He was a wonderful guy.
July 3, 2018
在「失控的正向思考」中，曾經結算大家向宇宙下的訂單總和將多驚人。「我在底層的生活中」，離開專欄作家身分，以一年時間化身為社會基層勞動人員（服務生、清潔工、收銀人員），地對地告訴我們，這個世界對底層人員的要求與報酬是支撐不了一個「人」的基礎生活。
我非常喜愛的社會實驗家/觀察家/作家Barbara Ehrenreich 這次化身為中年求職的白領階級（也就是管理階級），給自己一年的時間找到並工作，將一年心得彙集成這本書。
中年重新找工作是我們每個人都可能面臨的問題，書中的真實人物可能上星期才受到部門績效表揚，週末就被通知人事精簡。主管可能因為傑出貢獻累積高額年薪後，成為成本節省的頭號目標。你從來不會因為你夠優秀，就不需要重找工作。
是一場跌破眼鏡的心酸之旅，首先各種求職顧問、職涯教練會向你收取高額的費用（前幾天的餐桌話題看看台北各種昂貴的課程），輕易用並無效度的各項測驗定義你的人格。投了求職網站履歷卻石沈大海（公司根本不看這些東西），聞風而來的是各個傳銷集團襲擊脆弱的你。參加各種親切的工作連結團體，開始不到五分鐘主持人帶領錯愕的大家讚美主。親自到求職博覽會，那裡永遠徵求的是低階勞工。
雖然我曾經懷疑她是以半真半假的身份求職，自然缺乏實證向公司說明自己的能力。不過在書中其他訪談中看到這些影響其實有限。
至少我在書中觀察到的，如果你不是因為挖角而離開原工作，幾乎就註定了階級的向下流動。而在這一年的實驗結束後，她竟然沒找到任何工作，然而如結語所言，她可以回到專欄作家的身分，同夥們卻仍舊深陷失業泥沼。
結語所寫的，崩壞的美國健保制度，讓雇主更情願以約聘而非正職規避中年人員所可能造成的保險負擔。企業益發將員工是為拋棄式物品而非可投資的資產。不夠完整（至少不若北歐深刻思考）的失業救濟，讓社會低估/逃避對失業者的責任，高階管理階層甚至透過裁員增加自己的績效。以及變態要求求職/在職者的熱情/積極等近乎傻瓜的力量，只有專業演員才能在職場中生存。
白領階級所要面對的困境，出乎意料的，與藍領一樣艱困。
我非常喜愛的社會實驗家/觀察家/作家Barbara Ehrenreich 這次化身為中年求職的白領階級（也就是管理階級），給自己一年的時間找到並工作，將一年心得彙集成這本書。
中年重新找工作是我們每個人都可能面臨的問題，書中的真實人物可能上星期才受到部門績效表揚，週末就被通知人事精簡。主管可能因為傑出貢獻累積高額年薪後，成為成本節省的頭號目標。你從來不會因為你夠優秀，就不需要重找工作。
是一場跌破眼鏡的心酸之旅，首先各種求職顧問、職涯教練會向你收取高額的費用（前幾天的餐桌話題看看台北各種昂貴的課程），輕易用並無效度的各項測驗定義你的人格。投了求職網站履歷卻石沈大海（公司根本不看這些東西），聞風而來的是各個傳銷集團襲擊脆弱的你。參加各種親切的工作連結團體，開始不到五分鐘主持人帶領錯愕的大家讚美主。親自到求職博覽會，那裡永遠徵求的是低階勞工。
雖然我曾經懷疑她是以半真半假的身份求職，自然缺乏實證向公司說明自己的能力。不過在書中其他訪談中看到這些影響其實有限。
至少我在書中觀察到的，如果你不是因為挖角而離開原工作，幾乎就註定了階級的向下流動。而在這一年的實驗結束後，她竟然沒找到任何工作，然而如結語所言，她可以回到專欄作家的身分，同夥們卻仍舊深陷失業泥沼。
結語所寫的，崩壞的美國健保制度，讓雇主更情願以約聘而非正職規避中年人員所可能造成的保險負擔。企業益發將員工是為拋棄式物品而非可投資的資產。不夠完整（至少不若北歐深刻思考）的失業救濟，讓社會低估/逃避對失業者的責任，高階管理階層甚至透過裁員增加自己的績效。以及變態要求求職/在職者的熱情/積極等近乎傻瓜的力量，只有專業演員才能在職場中生存。
白領階級所要面對的困境，出乎意料的，與藍領一樣艱困。
October 9, 2022
This book was depressing. Not because of the masterfully crafted style of Ehrenreich, who weaves statistics, anecdotes and personal experience so seamlessly that a bleak landscape of early 2000s corporate life is readable. But because despite the 2 decades from her writing to this reading, I remember this culture and it's beige toxic positivity and enforced extroversion. The economic instability of the past 20 years and especially the Covid pandemic have shaken up the tired old structure and for that we can be thankful. Though living through shakeups of existing structures can be painful, sometimes the upheavals are necessary.
Ultimately, though, I'm not sure that corporations have changed that much, and that is also depressing.
Ultimately, though, I'm not sure that corporations have changed that much, and that is also depressing.
September 11, 2022
In honor of Ehrenreich’s passing, I decided to read one more of her books. I can think of no author who physically immersed herself into the realities associated with her topic than her. In this book she sets outs to get a front line view of work in white collar America. What she really explores is what is the reality of mid-life unemployment for white collar workers displaced from their jobs as corporations downsize, right-size and neglect any responsibility to society in regards to stable employment. It’s still an interesting read, though a few things have changed since it was written.
Ehrenreich was a great investigator and excellent writer. I will mis her work. May she rest in peace.
Ehrenreich was a great investigator and excellent writer. I will mis her work. May she rest in peace.
December 24, 2024
While this one is not as 'successful' in its goals as Nickel and Dimes, I preferred what it becomes as a breakdown of the industry catering to the white collar unemployed and their anxieties as well as the craven and nigh cruel personalities that cater to these unemployed. Also I like Barbara Ehrenreich's sardonic tone and curmudgeonly socialist tendencies; it makes her feel engaging in a way I tend to bounce off of with other journalists that write with a more personable style
Displaying 1 - 30 of 603 reviews