As anyone who is a fan of baseball can probably attest to, the unwritten rules are a series of conflicting opinions - applications vary thanks to numerous variables. Additionally, what is viewed as "playing the game the right way" differs player by player, which is not a clear black-and-white or good-and-evil issue. As Danny Knobler puts it, "So if Martin Prado, Buster Posey, and Kris Bryant play the game right, does that mean Javier Báez plays it wrong?" Painting a complete picture of the "unwritten" rules ultimately means a lot of hypocrisy, reaching, justifying, and lunacy. So, how do you depict all those complexities and paradoxes in a book?
I think Danny Knobler has a varying degree of success with the task. Unwritten does offer an impressive collection of various depictions and interpretations of baseball's unwritten rules. This book was obviously written with a nod toward modern day conventions, but I really appreciated the historical examples and interpretations to help reinforce the reality that the troublesome "unwritten rules" are not just a product of later generations. However, I do feel that Knobler was, to his detriment, *too* objective at times. I can understand his approach: let the player anecdotes and opinions speak for themselves. This method did work in some instances; for example, the Kenley Jensen chapter was just him reflecting about his baseball opinions, and it was arguably one of the best chapters in the book. However, Knobler never seems to critique his own stories. For example, a chapter ends with David Wright and Bobby Parnell throwing out Noah Syndergaard's lunch because he's eating instead of watching a Spring Training game, and it's summarized as "He didnt pay his dues." Why? Why is this accepted and not questioned? Again, Knobler observes the culture clash, changing of the guard, but doesn't stop to ask why it's happening or why it's needed. I know it's not a thesis, just a collection of essays, but I think that critical analysis here and there would add some much needed structure in a subject where literally none can be found.
Also, I hate how there are no accents or tildes in the players' names. I don't know if this is an author or publisher error, but the lack of punctuation in players' names equate to misspellings (eg, Acuna is not the same as Acuña). So much talk about respect - you can show respect by spelling the names correctly.