If I had to sum up this book in one word, that word would be "ugh". I got it for free on Amazon and read it in less than two days, mostly because I was stuck on a plane for the majority of that time, but also because it is very short and very little happens, especially very little that is surprising. I would have finished it sooner if I hadn't spent so much time sighing and rolling my eyes.
What's so terrible about this book? I made a list:
- I have not made an accurate calculation, but I think about 75% of this book is just filler. And by filler, I mean that it felt like reading an essay where the writer had been given a word limit they couldn't reach with their flimsy story, so they waffled on an on trying to get as close to the word limit as possible.
Sometimes there is just an extra word or two (such as unnecessary adjectives and descriptive words) that should have been removed by a good editor - except this book clearly didn't have a good editor.
Examples:
"A girlfriend of Krista's (in the "friend" sense only) stopped by and asked her to dance."
Even if Krista was gay (she isn't, in case you're wondering), this would add absolutely nothing to the story - I have read it all, and I know this for a fact. So why did you feel the need to clarify that?
"An area opposite the bed had a coffee table and two modern but fairly comfy chairs. She took one and he took the other."
Wow, thanks for specifying that, Mr Collins. Otherwise I would have assumed that the two characters (who have only met once before this scene) had sat on the floor, or shared a chair. This sentence is unnecessary and should have been cut. Also, since when do "modern" chairs equal "not comfy", forcing you to specify that they are, after all, fairly comfy?
- The author's favourite way of adding filler, however, is to describe what the characters are wearing, and how they look. I think that's 50% of the novel. Every time a character appears, even one we have met before, his or her appearance is meticulously described, from head to toe. Literally. If you read this you may not learn much about the characters, since they only have two dimensions, but you will for sure know that they are all handsome, or beautiful, or pretty, and also what shoes, trousers and tops they are wearing, how their hair is styled, and how clean and well put-together they look, or not. Guess what?
NOBODY CARES!!!!!
At least, I don't, and found it very very annoying. Adding lots of description does not make a good story. In this case, it adds nothing at all. It doesn't help the plot advance, it doesn't give you a sense of time or place - this story is so bland to begin with, it could be set anywhere, and the clothes don't help.
- poor editing: I have mentioned this already. There is bad grammar, and there are things that make no sense, that should have been pointed out. I have so many examples of this! Here are some:
1. "Galena High's favorite female alum" [sic].
I'm sorry, what? How did nobody spot, or bothered to check, what the singular female noun for a former student is? If they had done, they would have realised pretty quickly that alum is in fact something completely different, and not particularly pleasant.
2. "After showering, including shaving her legs and shampooing [...]".
This is both an example of the annoying "filler" technique and bad editing. This happens the day after a party. The author's wife proofreads for him, yet she didn't feel the need to point out that most women shave their legs BEFORE a party, not after. Well done, guys. Also, thank you for letting me know Krista washes her hair regularly. That adds a lot to the story.
Just in case you were wondering, at the party Krista was wearing "a little black Ralph Lauren dress, picked up at Nordstrom Rack in Oak Brook - half off the already discounted price. The black lace dress, with little cap sleeves, hit her just below the knee. The neckline was conservative, too, setting off her mother's pearls. Low-heeled, comfy pumps and little pop-of-color red Kate Spade purse on a gold-chain strap completed the effort (half price at an outlet store). Chic on the cheap!"
(yes, that last sentence is actually in the book. And of course it's totally normal that 28-year olds who go to their high school reunion do so wearing their mother's pearls).
3. Up the stairs your host pauses at the bottom of the stairs to the main dining room, from which there is no noise at all.
I'm sorry to be repetitive, but... again: what?
4. You hear a door open and a goodnight exchange between Jasmine to Tony, [...]
Somebody needs a crash course in grammar...
- Police speak: there is a lot of it in the book, as many of the main characters are cops. I am fine with that, with one exception, and that is the author's insistence on using the term "male" and "female" instead of "man" and "woman". The fact that these terms are used by the narrator when describing the action, rather than by policemen in work-related conversation/radio calls, makes this both unnecessary and irritating.
- While I have no problem with the main character Krista, her appearance at the beginning of the book is described in such a way that it just makes her look like a two-dimensional, slightly homophobic man's fantasy:
Krista at twenty-eight was a tall blonde (hair short but not mannishly so), her athletically slender but shapely figure somewhat hidden by the white blouse of her uniform - her long-sleeve polo (with badge-like insignia) a size up to downplay the natural beauty of her Danish genes. The weather required only a navy windbreaker today; her holstered .45-caliber Glock 21 rode high on her right hip, a badge pinned to her belt at left, her cotton slacks navy, her steel-toed shoes black.
I'm sorry, I couldn't resist adding another outfit description in there, just in case you did not know what policemen in uniform look like. This was 4% into the novel. A blonde, young Scandinavian woman, athletic but not too muscular, in a police uniform. Male fantasy, or am I being too sensitive? At least she's fairly likeable. I say fairly, because like everyone else she only has two dimensions: on-duty cop, and off-duty cop who calls her dad "Pops" because she heard it in a Charlie Chan film.
- The story: predictable, boring, and the kind you can't solve on your own because you're not given enough information about the suspects. I would have paid more attention, if I hadn't been so annoyed by all of the above, but I don't think it was worth it. This is apparently the first in a series. I wish Max Allan Collins luck in thinking of enough outfit descriptions to waffle through another 2 or 3 books, but I won't be reading them.
- After reading a few other reviews for this book, I was stunned to find out not only that most people seemed to enjoy it, but also that they thought it was "fast paced". The "Girl Most Likely" dies 93 pages into a 259 page novel mostly composed of description of clothing and rooms. If you think this is fast paced, I would be interested in knowing what your definition of a slow book is.
At the end of the book, I was informed that Max Allan Collins was named a Grand Master in 2017 by the Mystery Writers of America. If writing like this is all it takes to become a "Grand Master", then it isn't much of an accolade. I am so glad I did not pay to read this. Avoid like the plague, unless you have trouble sleeping.