"The Queen Bee," by Randall Garrett, 32 pg. (1958): 7.75
- A nice distillation of the bastardized plot macchinations that occur once you mix Golden Age misogyny and sex madness into hack-y whole. Nonetheless, the whole thing -- dare I say -- hangs together (?) well as a purely paint-by-numbers construction.
"Prime Essential," by E.C. Tubbs (1955): 6.5
- Tubbs (writing here as Frank Weight) does the near impossible--he looks at the broad swathe of pre-New Wave sf and says 'oh, you think you're horny?!' The story: in preparation for attempts to colonize new world, men and women are put in 'conditioning pods' to prepare them for the harshness of the environment they'll be entering. The two, so we're to believe, hindrances that they'll most need to shed before landfall: tobacco/caffeine (hilarious) and clothes, since, of course, it's gonna be hot down there. [NOTE: if there's one thing to point to as a reason for the welcome addition of the Social Sciences into the sfnal slate, start here]. The mixed group starts in skivvies, and our protagonist ends naked. Along the way, he forces himself on another woman (a common pre-Russ trope) before a woman comes onto him and he refuses (I mean, really, just such rich mining here for the sexual psychologist). Whatever. It ends with him horny and realizing that, 'oh, the other thing we need to shed is any concern for the specific person we're fucking, since propogation in itself is the virtue'--as a new woman joins him naked in the release pod, after we'd been following this whole other Big-Brother group the whole time. Just a *chef's kiss* perfect little nugget of the genre here.
"Two by Two," by John Brunner (1956): 7.5
- Very straightforward apocalypse scenario. Oh god, I just realized that the astronaut's name is "Arkwright."
"No Land of Nod," by Sherwood Springer (1952): 8.5
- Here's how to do the classic last man (aka sex perv) story well.
“The Girls and Nugent Miller,” by Robert Sheckley (1960): 8
- Minor Sheckley, but, being Sheckley, a smart sendup of a pulp theme nonetheless underwritten by a type of meaningful ambiguity, i.e. is this some sort of preternatural exposition on the pervasiveness of toxic masculinity, on the particular amalgam of circumstance and strained ego possible to corrupt even the best men? Or, was it a victim-blaming screed particularly unreasonable feminists? How do we read this outside of time? There's an answer there, just depends how you want to approach it.
“Mother To The World,” by Richard Wilson (1968): 6.5
- The interesting thing about these exceptionally horny (and this one, I think it’s fair to say, is hornier than the rest) genre stories is that the line between kink and conceit effectively vanishes. This is, obviously, a shame-free zone, but at the same time, some psyches are more naked than others. To wit, our protagonist here (hilariously, as we later learn, basically a woods-dwelling sovereign citizen) finds himself alone with only one other: a halfwit 20-something. In this and many other ways, the story is a true curio: the apotheosis of precisely those subconscious desires (desk jockeys unencumbered! grab the rifle, tame the beasts, and roam free [cause god forbid anything but holocaust cause Americans to take up Freikörperkultur]) and cruelties so many critics have identified animating precisely these sorts of dystopias, exemplified by his overriding concern for animals (all those pets!) not two days after literally everyone on the planet has been tortured to death. As a story, just wildly scattershot, moving from the Portnoys Complaint predilections of the beginning to the elegiac, Earth Abides penultimate section, and the Spahns Ranch suspicious serenity of the free love finale. Basically, a fitting memento to 1968.