FRUSTRATING
Characters
Emily, as a Chemistry Research Professor, was a nice, if somewhat bland and perfect character. Giving a character an intriguing interest (chemistry, fireworks, re-chargeable batteries) does not an interesting character make.
She had very few struggles or conflicting desires, even her sadness over her parents' deaths felt like a token "last minute" struggle in the last 20% of the book.
Noah, a Bible professor at the same university, was rather less likeable. There was nothing "bad" about him... he just came across as extraordinarily methodical in his "wooing" of Emily (which she apparently didn't realise, being surprised when he agrees to a date 90% in) and as a result somewhat creepy.
Plot
There's very little plot. I can understand why. The author's thesis is that when you become a Christian life is full of gifts and nothing goes wrong. When it does (for instance, you get a headache - an oft-quoted example in the book) you simply pray for it to go away, and it does.
Not only this, but you also become perfect, to quote: "you are righteous now... you will automatically and without effort show your new nature... you have a divine nature that does not sin." [Interestingly, this is contradicted in the final pages of the book, when the author admits that we do, indeed, sin sometimes.]
Unfortunately this leaves very little drama or conflict. The plot involved Emily and Noah having a "perfect summer" (another oft-referenced fact).
Emily goes on expensive holidays, flies business class with Noah, eats delicious food, receives bountiful recognition for her inventions, and struggles with what to do with all the money she is about to make, and which of two equally-amazing jobs she should take.
Style
As other reviewers have said, this lacks the polish of Henderson's traditionally published works. Several personal peeves include:
- not giving Satan a capital letter
- the consistent use of the adjective "elegant" by both characters and the narrator. ie. "That is an elegant concept"
- repetition of phrases, including identical sentences repeated with the space of a few paragraphs
- near the end, "its" without a contraction apostrophe several times
- jarring notes by the author inserted mid-story. ie. "if you want to skip the rest of the conversation/message skip to chapter X." Honestly, that feels like the author is admitting that she thinks readers will find her story boring. If you know something is boring, why put it in?
- I'm Australian, so I'm more than willing to give Henderson the benefit of the doubt, but no
body I know speaks this formally and in such detail in casual conversations like these characters do. Perhaps they do in the US.
Content
I'm not going to attempt to refute each and every one of Henderson's (copious) theological points here. I'm simply going to list them, and state that they are heresy, plain and simple. Her main theme is: Most Christians go about their life without taping into the glorious power they have as children of God. Emily and Noah, of course, are not like the rest, they see clearly and so live blessed lives of bliss.
Her points (some backed up with out of context Bible verses, others simply stated as fact) include:
- All Christians can live forever on earth (or, at the very least, until 120 years old) as long as they believe it will be so
- All disease and trials can be healed as long as people have enough faith
- As long as a "true" Christian prays, any dead person can be raised (unfortunately, no one prayed for Emily's parents, and they're too long gone now for prayer to work)
- Perfection is achievable on earth
- When "true" Christians "die", "the medical examiner doing our autopsy can't find a cause for why we stopped breathing as our bodies are in perfect health"
- Christians should spend 17 hours per week with God, if you don't, you're not really living as a "true" Christian
The list goes on. The sad thing is, these characters truly love Jesus. There is much to be inspired by their walk with Him. There are some truths in here, but there are a lot of falsehoods and misconceptions.
The reason I know this is because the Gospel is complex and rich. It is a message which can be given to university professors in Chicago and to prostitutes in a war-torn country. It provides a satisfying answer to suffering and pain.
Emily and Noah's gospel does not do this. As the book concludes the characters each reiterate that they are deeply blessed by God. Their proof? They have good jobs, lots of money, lots of time, beautiful places to live, and a promising relationship.
If this is the sure sign of God's blessing, what use is Emily and Noah's in the real world? None at all.