The depth of this book is immense; it leaves no stone unturned. A full half - half! - of the book is sources and appendices.
And because of that, unless you are deep into governmental regulation, epidemiology, or the technical history of food safety, this isn't the book for you.
I wound up skimming at least half the text. The alphabet soup of agencies and programs is eye-crossing - which, when you come down to it, is the second-biggest issue in food safety, 500 different agencies having a thermometer in the pot, and each one being responsible for just one tiny sliver of responsibility (ex: Consumer Reports found rodent hairs and insect bits in 8 major brands of pot pie [relax, this was 50 years ago]. FDA said that's the USDA's problem, they deal with meat. USDA kicked it back and said, it's not our meat, it's the spices, and that's an FDA issue. Eventually it was found to be the shells, which was grain, which *was* an issue of the FDA. Now there are 50 more agencies involved, and you find out the grain was grown in Mexico, shipped to its sister facility in Oklahoma, mixed with grain from 4 different suppliers, relabeled as Oklahoma-grown, and shipped to 10 different warehouses that went to 8 processing plants which were sold to 10 grocery chains and 120 restaurants... .) (The #1 issue is corporate greed and irresponsibility)
In short, every food safety law on the book has been the result of people getting sick and dying through poor - and profitable - handing of food. Food safety started because of adulterated milk, from sick cows who were fed the pressed mash from distilleries, which made them give a sickly bluish-gray milk, which was then further adulterated with whiteners - chalk, or plaster - to make it look healthy again. Needless to say, the infant mortality rate of New York City was around 25%, much of it due to drinking this toxic milk. When milk purity began to be regulated, children thrived, and a new industry was born.
This book is interesting, I did learn a lot, but I like case histories, and this doesn't focus on case histories or investigation; it focuses on laws and procedures, and that's just not what I want to read about.
For lawyers and epidemiologists only.