The greatest threat facing the United States today doesn’t come from China, Iran, or even Russia; it’s the growing number of Americans who believe Karl Marx’s socialism provides the best strategy for making our communities safer, healthier, and more prosperous. But the most significant danger posed by socialism isn’t that its implementation would lead to greater poverty and fewer property rights, it’s that socialism would create numerous moral problems, including the limits it would place on individual liberty and religious freedom. In Socialism Is The Moral Case Against Marx’s Radical Dream, conservative columnist and think tank research fellow Justin Haskins examines the moral perils of Marx’s socialism and explains why if socialism were to be imposed in its fullest form, it wouldn’t just damage people’s freedoms, it would obliterate them. Haskins argues it would be dangerous to attempt to create Marx’s utopian socialist world, and even more importantly, that such an attempt would be so highly immoral that it could reasonably be called “evil.” In Socialism Is Evil, Haskins makes the moral case against socialism and also describes in detail what socialists believe, the differences between socialism and communism, why Marx’s socialism will never be completely adopted, and why even the more moderate European-style socialism, called “democratic socialism” by some, is highly immoral and anti-American. Many socialists are kind, generous people with good intentions, but sometimes, good intentions can create devastating results. Socialism Is Evil briefly tackles some of the most important moral controversies surrounding Marx’s socialism, providing supporters of individual liberty with the tools they need to stop the rise of socialism in its tracks.
This book is a really refreshing approach to evils of socialism. It doesn't dig into the past of socialism & what unfortunate things have happened due to it. It only takes the moral case forward & meticulously debates on the moral evils. It establishes what it says in the title of the book & I must say the title wasn't just a rhetoric. He managed to prove it considerably well.
This is a quick read, but an excellent exploration of the moral pitfalls and dangers of implementing Marx’s socialist ideology as he defined it. Socialism will always ultimately lead to placing restraints on individual and religious liberties.
The Left is very slowly and methodically pushing this agenda to the fullest in my country. Every incoming college student should take time to read this work; because it won't be on any formal required reading list. This is the Left's agenda; make no mistake about it. The agenda might initially sound attractive. This is the danger. It is an agenda from those who believe they know what's best for us all. And in this arrogant approach takes away our individual liberty to believe and act as we, speaking only for myself, see fit by our own unique world view. In my case, my eternal view.
the main issue with this book is that it uses the argument against communism to fight socialism. While socialism part of the communism they are not one and the same. The arguments have no real proof other than communist countries that failed. He is using strong words that hopefully appeal to the reader's feelings, he creates fear that someone will take what is theirs, but at the end of the book I got no real arguments why socialism is bad other than "socialism is bad because communism is bad". Waste of time
Strong title and a US perspective. I think that the reasoning in this book is a little on the short side. He is right, but there are certainly better arguments and examples. It is also good that he targets social democracy, not only out right communism.
Still good that someone makes the popular simplistic argument, because ultimately he is right - socialism is not even a good idea it is immoral
A very clear book about the evil of Marx's ideas, even taking into consideration that majoraties political decisions are the basis for legalising their decisions. It is a very clever way from Socialists to update Marxism in a Democratic Society and Societies.The creation of a Moral based on the the espirit of collectivity, nothing else than a dictatorship of a majority over a minoraty. All this based within a short time view, making life more dificult for the future generations. This new Marxism is becoming so populist, or more, than some other social polical trends, in our time.
I reccomend this book to anyone that prefers liberty than anything else in exchange, to loose it. To recomend to Socialists even those well intended, would be a lost of time.
Justin Haskin's book "Socialism Is Evil", is a concise very well written book. As the author explains Socialism will end individual freedoms as we know it. The author is right that many people or groups will be forced to go against their moral principals. In addition, Socialism goes against Human Nature. Most people need incentives to better themselves. There are things about Socialism that I find disturbing! For Instance, the Socialists play the Class Warfare game. The rich are bad in the Socialist view. Somehow, in the Socialist agenda, The rich don't deserve their wealth. Jealousy is a divisive game that the Socialists play. In a free economy, people have individual freedoms. They can choose their own doctors and are not afraid to practice their religion. I have personally known many individuals from modest backgrounds who have lived the American Dream. I highly recommend reading this book.
An outstanding, easily understood, description of socialism/communism.
As a writer and publisher, I especially appreciate this description of socialism/communism because it’s thoughts are presented clearly, are easily absorbed, and just as effectively understood. It mirrors my own long standing historical research and conclusions about the severe, disastrous, evils of socialism/communism.
Forty four years in our business management, marketing, and advertising arena have given me deep, abiding faith that America’s foundational freedoms provide the most effective way to individual prosperity, achievement, security, and contentment ever devised in this world.
This is yet another must read for those fellow Americans who know how vital it now is to counter the press toward this evil, murderous, system of government by socialist/communist politicians in present day America.
A wonderful (short, concise, easy to read, sane) book on why Socialism is F'ed up and why an ideal socialist society can never exist. It basically comes down to two primary issues -- competition is innate to all living things nature (we compete even just for fun) And collectivism requires decisions which will violate the morality of the individual. These two issues are based on an understanding of the human condition. The author doesn't mention my favorite objection which is, aside from the unread illiterate lazy and stupid, the primary advocate for socialism is society are those who want to be our autocratic dictators. No thank you.
Instead of focusing primarily on the “economics” of socialism, this books presents a good foundation to the moral pitfalls of socialism and why it ultimately requires violating basic human rights in order to function(which is no guarantee). I like this approach because it’s rarely mentioned but worth discussing more so than the economics in my opinion. I would recommend this to anyone researching this topic but not as a stand alone go to source.
Some good points are given about how infeasible Marxist socialism is, and how easy the outcome does not become what the people want. But his critique on western Europe democratic socialism, is really biased. Just because some people are against abortion, the government should not take care of health care, since that would go against their moral values? How about the tax money that goes to fighting wars that some people in the country are against? The same thing could be said about that.
The problem with this book is the author is creating a bogeyman that doesn't exist in America. American's aren't thinking "socialism" as a political/economic system. Americans simply want what every other country in the world already has: national health care and other fundamental economic protections for all members of the wealthiest society in history (but where the top 1000 citizens hoard 50% of the total).
Take the very few minutes to read this and consider the reasoning behind the title. Many of us are confronted daily with the ever romantic notion of a Democratic Socialist rhetoric; the constant praise and promotion of the main stream media, that it's nice to be able to point to and recommend a book to give argument to this dogma.
Should be required reading in secondary schools and above!
Every fact given can be easily verified through existing news and literary archives. I was born in 1934 and lived through all of the history referenced in this book and vividly remember all the facts and events given in this well thought-out book. People, you had better believe this.
Excellent manuscript thwarting socialism and the progressives.
Well-researched, scholarly yet readable. Haskins gives both sides of a number of contemporary social issues and concerns. A great apologetic. A quick read that should have you thinking about it long after you have laid it down. Excellent thought-provokes.
Good attempt at an accessible approach to teaching the futility of socialism -to paraphrase Ayn Rand, "But I didn't mean this!" Nice that the book quotes from socialist primary sources and illustrates socialism's necessity of the individual having to do things that run counter to his or her own beliefs.
The author presents both perspectives and employs human social history, intellectual logic, and the principles of the American Constitution to dispute the validity of socialism as an adoptable form of government in the U.S. I would recommend every left-leaning citizen and member of Congress read this book.
This book succinctly gives intelligent,rational arguments against socialism. Really great for someone who wants to combat the pro socialist agenda permeating our schools,media and govt lately
An interesting perspective; socialism leads to total collapse of individual freedoms. There is no free lunch! Stalin and Hitler both began as socialist reformers.
Where did that lead to? Total disaster. A very good read with a realistic slant on the perils of Socialism .
A sharp, clear and easy to read rebuttal explaining how Socialism violates basic human nature and requires great acts of evil to begin and continue. A very solid read.
The facts are overwhelming. Try this test! takeaway every single development in medicine for profit and you would be left with nothing. No medical books, schools, drugs, equipment, doctors, nurses, etc...
Easy read of non-fiction material well presented by the author. But of course no professed Democratic Socialist would be interested in reading this and learning their utopian theories can never work. So full steam ahead to those vote grabbing pols that only pretend to care about anything else.
No explica nada nuevo, ni nada que cualquier persona con dos dedos de frente y que ha estudiado sin adoctrinamiento no sepa, pero lo explica de forma sencilla y directa, sin dar rodeos, además de exponer ejemplos claros y actuales.
The author's case is a MORAL argument against totalitarian governance, I'm afraid that ship has sailed. I agree with all he states but the American experiment in governance CANNOT exist unless we all agree on the concept of shared morality.