Think the most important thing about Christians is that we all agree theologically? Think again.
In this quick and accessible book, Viola gives us something noteworthy and needed—a moment to pause and consider that we might be wrong, and what that means for how we treat other people, based on their beliefs.
As long as there have been Christian writers expressing theological ideas, there have been theological disagreements and controversies. In certain places and times these disagreements have resulted in violence. It’s easy to think that we today are far too civilized for all of that. Think again.
The internet has opened the door for noisy theological factions to engage in all new kinds of condemnation, censure and character assassination. The attacks and e-Excommunications roll down in crushing waves—with the sole effect of demonstrating to the watching world that Christians are mostly concerned with being right, and are incapable of treating each other (let alone outsiders) with grace and kindness.
The main portion of the book is a survey of a number of significant “heroes of the faith,” people who were influential in their time, and who have left an indelible mark on Christianity. Many of these people are “patron saints” of a one particular theological group or other. For each one, Viola recounts a number of beliefs these luminaries held that would be considered peculiar, perhaps unorthodox, or even “shocking.”
Many, if not most Christians today are unfortunately very poorly educated on theological history, and assume (with the help of their local church pastors) that the theology taught in their local congregation is note-for-note the same as held by the apostles in 1st century Palestine. So, it will come as a surprise for many to learn that these theologians—every one considered an orthodox defenders of the faith—held beliefs that might get them kicked out of their local church.
Why take the time to point out that these great influencers held to beliefs that are unorthodox?
In order to make this important point: If we are capable of honoring and listening to the theological contribution of these leaders whose beliefs had blind spots, inaccuracies, or perhaps were just plain wrong, then maybe we can relate respectfully to others we disagree with.
The small remainder of the book includes several short chapters addressing related topics like how we speak to one another, the nature of heresy, the true purpose of the creed, and how church unity is not primarily built on doctrinal uniformity.
In an age where anyone can leave an excoriating public comment on Facebook or as a review, or can write a vicious condemnatory blog post, we need Viola’s reminder. Read this little book to learn something new about a handful of the most influential Christian thinkers in history, but also (and more importantly) to catch a vision of a different kind of church unity.
What unifies us is not perfect doctrinal agreement. Our calling is not forcing others to agree with us. The standard we are ultimately measured by is not our perfect agreement with the creed. It was Jesus himself who said that the particular quality that we would be known by was our love. And how else is love seen, if not in the charitable way we treat people—especially people we disagree with?