What do you think?
Rate this book


416 pages, Paperback
First published January 1, 1969
The enormous difference between the relationships you need, and the one you deeply want. The need is created out of an accumulation of negativities, planted by traumatic experiences: fears, doubts, anxiety, dependence, weakness in certain realms, inadequacy, incompleteness. A certain relationship can remove the fear, calm anxiety, supply a certain completion, replace a loss, fulfill an organic insufficiency, lull an insecurity, supply a substitute love.I don't read Nin for the sake of engaging with honest self-reflexive insight. However much she praises her own sensibilities when it comes psychoanalysis and introspection, comparing certain early pages of this volume of hers to certain later ones reveal her to be either a liar, a fool, a hypocrite, or merely someone being changed by a system that they scoff at the existence of. What I do read her for are the beautiful instances that she sometimes hits upon as represented above, as well as for the window onto history that diverges enough from the usual white male rendering of such to be fascinating, but is also familiar enough to not pose me too much struggle. This is a writer who regularly namedrops Proust and Artaud while praising her own acceptance of Black people (all the while complaining that Josephine Baker has been given a palace while she has not), but there are also certain names, largely of women, that seem to deserve as much, if not more, attention than Nin has gained herself in these quarantined days, if only judging from her portrayal of them and their works. Still, completely ignore social systems in favor of interpreting the entire universe on the basis of literary tropes one too many times, and even I will grow rather tired of being told that the solution to everything is to give Nin enough money to render her favorites into writing esteemed by the cultivated mainstream. I'm still bent on finishing the rest of the series for reasons of pleasurable expectation as well as practical completionism, but I'm glad that I won't be taking the next step till next year.
But it may not be the love one would want if free of all these negativities. A negative element dictates the choice, much as a climbing plant seeks a wall to rest on, and prevents a positive choice.
That is my essential reason for writing, not for fame, not to be celebrated after death, but to heighten and create life all around me.If Nin had stuck to these principles all the way through to the very end where a critical review in the New York Times throws her into utter ecstasies, this would have made for a very good entry in her grandiose sprawl of a diary. As it stands, she observed the detrimental effects of poverty on her physical and mental wellbeing, commiserated with the Black communities in her area, amazingly benefited from having a woman be her psychoanalyst in place of extremely misogynistic men (not that women can't be misogynistic, but there was a certain humanizing sympathy that simply wasn't present in previous professionals), and then rushed back to her European aesthetics and cultural exotification and called it a day. Much as I appreciate her mentions of Mabel Dodge Luhan, Etsu Inagaki Sugimoto, Marija Jurić Zagorka, and Eibhlín Dubh Ní Chonaill, these are individual tidbits, not the kind of grand universal theory that Nin certainly thought she was convincingly espousing. Much as people who aren't white stop being such an oasis in an alienating foreign landscape when they go against her creative whims (publicly confusing Chinese for Japanese seven years after the Nanjing Massacre and accompanying imperial invasion and then believing herself an innocent target of hatred when a Chinese person doesn't approve), her sympathies only extend to the poor and/or workers, whether white collar or blue, when they don't think to question the status quo. As per usual, most of it was very pretty, and it was nice when Nin started waking up to the fact that her taking on too much of what we would call emotional labor (along with no small amount of unreciprocated financial offerings) was leaving her a nervous wreck. Too bad she still wasn't so badly off that she would have had to welcome the solidarity of other women, rather than pay another analyst to tell her how to artistically deal with her anxiety and depression.
We choose the verdict and then proceed to substantiate the fact.
The healthy they speak of is hygienic sterility. It rejects the experience of life, maturity, ripeness, risk. They refuse to evolve, ripen, alter, out of fear of death,. They try to cheat time and remain young by standing still and remaining virgin. They think that one remains young but not living, not loving, not erring, not giving or spending or wasting one's self.Virginia Woolf, Richard Wright, Pearl Buck, Tennessee Williams, Stefan Zweig, Djuna Barnes, Carson McCullers, Rebecca West, Henry Miller, William Faulkner, Dorothy Canfield, Sherwood Anderson: all either live through or around these pages here, and those are only the ones that I personally recognized in one way or another. Some of Nin's estimations of these varied literary figures amuse (her being continually counseled to write another 'The Good Earth' was especially hilarious), others infuriate, and I'm not sure whether it's ironic or sordid that the writer she had no time for up until the moment said writer filled her pockets with rocks and walked into the Thames is the one who is evoked in this volume's concluding literary triumph. I've seen the phrase 'writing for writers' thrown about on one highfalutin list or another, and part of what keeps me coming back is this minute, unorthodox view of the owners of names that have become monolithic in my time, if not entirely equally across the board. Less a blast from the past than the sort of scintillation one gets from a pinewood scented candle that one lit and then forgot about, so I suppose this is my voyeuristic way of hobnobbing with the literarily famed and fortunate who, as is usually the case with the personages I esteem, are all long dead. So, Nin may not be the best fit for my own reading tastes, but who else is going to give me this kind of weird well-written window into the past?
Paul Rosenfield is writing his biography. He asked me: "Where do I begin?"P.S. This is the period when Nin composed a great deal of the erotica that forms the mainstay of her reputation today, and I have to wonder, judging on the pedophilia that was left in, what was affronting enough to be left out.
I said: "Name, first of all, all the wishes you had, and then tell which ones came true and which ones did not."