I was inspired by this book. Essentially Kompridis is looking for a way we can recapture a sense of creativity and innovation in critical theory after Adorno and Horkheimer ended in despair and Habermas responded by limiting it to procedural ethics. He does this by reclaiming from Heideggerian thought "disclosure" as a concept, which he carefully defends from the critics who suggest such a concept is irrational, elitist or even possibly tyrannical. As "disclosure" we can now see politics as something always emergent and dynamic, constantly in dialogue with the world. And implicit in this is an openness to the experiences of others, who continually challenge and transform our views. It also entails a respect for our intellectual and cultural traditions, which we now recognize as constitutive of our own voice, and don't just treat as fodder to be ruthlessly deconstructed and unmasked as politically suspect. While the sentiment is great, and Kompridis writes fantastically, I still can't quite figure out how this works as a critical theory. That is, beyond prompting a dispositional change or introducing an ethical "ought", I can't see how this translates into political practice. Then again, maybe the point is that it is up to us...