Commando: Shoot to Kill by Peter Rische left me with mixed feelings. It is presented as military fiction, yet it is written very much like a first-person memoir, which creates an odd tension throughout the book. The tactical descriptions of the Rhodesian Bush War are generally convincing and often align well with techniques described in other accounts I have read. At the same time, some of the terminology and phrasing feels out of place, and the relatively limited use of distinctly Rhodesian military language made me question just how closely the author understood the culture he was portraying.
I also had trouble with several of the operations. The opening engagement, in particular, felt strongly reminiscent of Operation Dingo, only reduced in scale, while later operations in Zambia seemed to parallel episodes I remembered from other Rhodesian accounts. There is nothing wrong with military fiction drawing inspiration from history, but when recognizable real operations become apparent templates, it begins to blur the distinction between historical fiction and simply repackaging historical events. Unless an author is deliberately writing alternate history or placing fictional characters within known events, I would prefer the fiction to stand more firmly on its own.
Unfortunately, the greatest weakness of the book is its editing. The prose contains frequent problems with verb tense, grammar, and sentence construction that repeatedly pulled me out of otherwise enjoyable action sequences. There are some good military stories here, and at times the book captures the aggressive small-unit nature of the Rhodesian conflict quite well. Ultimately, though, I can only rate it as an okay military-fiction read. Between the poor editing, questions about authenticity, and the apparent reliance on recognizable historical operations, I simply cannot recommend it as a particularly good example of Rhodesian Bush War military fiction.