Drawing on his work on contemporary postcolonial Pacific societies, Nicholas Thomas takes up three issues central to the cultural and political dynamics of colonial encounters, the nature of Western and non-Western transactions (such as the gift and the commodity), and the significance of material objects in social life. Along the way, he raises doubts about any simple "us / them" dichotomy between Westerners and Pacific Islanders, challenging the preoccupation of anthropology with cultural difference by stressing the shared history of colonial entanglement. Thomas integrates general issues into a historical discussion of the uses Pacific Islanders and Europeans have made of each other's material artifacts. He explores how 19th-century and 20th-century islanders, and visitors from the time of the Cook voyages up to the 1990s have fashioned identities for themselves and each other by appropriating and exchanging goods. Previous writers have explored museums and the tribal art market, but this book concentrates on the distinct interests of European collectors and the islanders. It should be of interest to all those working in the fields of cultural studies, from history
My boss lent me this book when I told him that I was interested in material culture and colonial anthropology. It's one of his tomes from college. Eventually I have to give it back to him.
Was assigned for a class in economic anthropology, but the majority of the class found it unnecessarily pretentious and for the most part, dry as hell.
Beats around the bush and after 20 pages and hours spent deciphering the academic diarrhea, you're not much likely to get any smarter than when you first started out.
This book is worthy of more attention from someone who is interested in anthropology, history and even natural sciences. Thomas clearly exemplifies how western perspectives and indigenous culture "entangled" in a non-essentialist way. Many details are clear (too much to write). Impressively, Thomas argues that critical theories risk creating more oppositions in the landscape of anthropology. Obsession with local contexts is likely to lead to the ignorance of global exchanges. This book seems to be more convincing than groundbreaking.
The first and second chapter are somewhat borish to get through, however once you get to the third and the fourth chapter they are incredibly awesome, I enjoyed them thoroughly. Although Thomas could certainly use a bit of editing to order his thoughts better, they are good thoughts and I enjoyed reading them.
I'm sure that there are a multitude of intriguing nuggets to be gleaned from this text, but Good God, it can't be worth the trouble! I dutifully waded through the first 34 pages of anthropological jargon-laden psyco-babble and promptly threw in the towel...If I'm feeling more charitably inclined (or guilty) at a later date I may revisit it, or at least the stunning(?) conclusion.