What do you think?
Rate this book
Evidence for Hope: Making Human Rights Work in the 21st Century
A history of the successes of the human rights movement and a case for why human rights work
Evidence for Hope makes the case that yes, human rights work. Critics may counter that the movement is in serious jeopardy or even a questionable byproduct of Western imperialism. Guantánamo is still open and governments are cracking down on NGOs everywhere. But human rights expert Kathryn Sikkink draws on decades of research and fieldwork to provide a rigorous rebuttal to doubts about human rights laws and institutions. Past and current trends indicate that in the long term, human rights movements have been vastly effective. Exploring the strategies that have led to real humanitarian gains since the middle of the twentieth century, Evidence for Hope looks at how essential advances can be sustained for decades to come.
Evidence for Hope makes the case that yes, human rights work. Critics may counter that the movement is in serious jeopardy or even a questionable byproduct of Western imperialism. Guantánamo is still open and governments are cracking down on NGOs everywhere. But human rights expert Kathryn Sikkink draws on decades of research and fieldwork to provide a rigorous rebuttal to doubts about human rights laws and institutions. Past and current trends indicate that in the long term, human rights movements have been vastly effective. Exploring the strategies that have led to real humanitarian gains since the middle of the twentieth century, Evidence for Hope looks at how essential advances can be sustained for decades to come.
328 pages, Paperback
First published January 1, 2017
25 people are currently reading
251 people want to read
About the author
Kathryn Sikkink
15 books15 followersKathryn Sikkink is the Ryan Family Professor of Human Rights Policy at the Harvard Kennedy School of Government and the Carol K. Pforzheimer Professor at the Radcliffe Institute for Advanced Study.
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 7 of 7 reviews
November 29, 2025
amazing but omg this could have been 100 pages not 300
September 30, 2019
Excellent portrayal of human rights efforts reflective of a global approach in its inception, implementation, and ultimately, as the solution to global inequality.
“Human rights do not let the ends justify the means because the means are also the ends. In other words, if the well-being and rights of individual humans are the ends we seek, abusing those rights cannot be the means to that end.”
“Human rights do not let the ends justify the means because the means are also the ends. In other words, if the well-being and rights of individual humans are the ends we seek, abusing those rights cannot be the means to that end.”
February 18, 2018
This is a great overview of an important topic. The language is verrrry academic though, to the tune of:
"Uruguay and the countries campaigning to protect the right to health acquired no less an ally than comedian John Oliver, whose send-up of Phillip Morris's obvious greed and cynicism was as hilarious as it was well researched."
"Uruguay and the countries campaigning to protect the right to health acquired no less an ally than comedian John Oliver, whose send-up of Phillip Morris's obvious greed and cynicism was as hilarious as it was well researched."
January 10, 2018
An essential look at the history and present state of human rights in the world and one that rightly puts it in a positive light.
December 11, 2019
Apparently human rights is something the flourishes when paper pushers like Sikkink are well fed and they die once the grants become more scarce.
September 25, 2023
Important attempt to synthesise the idealism of human rights with on-the-ground realities, with a dose of tempered optimism.
September 12, 2017
Kathryn Sikkink’s “Evidence for Hope” is exactly what its title conveys: empirical evidence to help encourage the work of human rights advocates and activists. It is a lucid, well-researched, and well-structured.
Looking around the world today, one can often feel as though human rights are on the retreat—with new political figures like Trump and Duterte, aggressive attacks on civil society in places like Russia and Israel, attacks on the press by states and on indigenous populations by states and extractive corporations, not to mention the atrocities committed by groups like ISIS. The list goes on.
And there can often be a disingenuousness in human rights discourse—when countries absolve their allies of responsibility for human rights (see the US’s double standard on Iran and Saudi Arabia, for one), when Saudi Arabia gets to chair the UN Human Rights Council, when countries like the US get to commit war crimes with impunity, and when the mantra of “human rights” is invoked to justify wars that always seem to make the problems worse. Human rights discourse and practice can be attacked by those who don’t care and those who protest the sanctimonious of those who don’t care. But is there no hope left for human rights?
Don’t give up so easily, counsels Sikkink, a Professor of Human Rights Policy at the Harvard Kennedy School. In this book, she sets out to (1) respond to the critics of the legitimacy and effectiveness of human rights, (2) highlight the diverse political origins of human rights, (3) convey the advances that have been made through human rights advocacy and activism, and (4) chart a path forward.
Sikkink, well-versed in Latin American history, stresses the contributions of Latin American jurists, academics, and activists to landmark documents in the history of human rights, like the UN Declaration of Human Rights. Countries from the Global South were the main advocates of the inclusion of strong human rights language—not the US and Europe, as many might mistakenly think. And, as she explains in her chapter on Cold War struggles, human rights advocacy has a robust history in the Latin American left, where it was essential to pushing back against right-wing dictatorships.
Sikkink faults those who criticize the effectiveness of human rights of relying on a comparison to the ideal, rather than analyzing empirical progress. She highlights the many ways in which, over the past seventy years, we have made advances toward realizing the goals expressed in the UDHR and in bringing some accountability to the crimes committed in the Cold War (and since). Human rights activists will often be disappointed because there is so much work left to do, and because the concept of human rights is expandable. We are always broadening our idea of what counts as a “right,” so the bar is always being set higher. But an understanding of victories past is vital to being able to fight the good fight in the present and future without resorting to despair.
Sikkink points out the fundamental flaws of the logic so often invoked by humanitarian interventionists in the US. War, as Sikkink makes clear, is one of the prime causes of human rights violations. So war as a solution to human rights violations is a stretch. That doesn’t mean that war is *never* justified; the hurdle should just be set very high because there’s a strong chance that more damage will be done in the process.
One of Sikkink’s most striking observations is how the rhetoric used against Islamic fundamentalist terrorism in the post-9/11 era strongly resembles the rhetoric used against communists in Latin America during the Cold War. Demonization combined with a belief that ends justify the means can only lead to disaster. With human rights, the ends and means must be the same; you cannot violate human rights for the sake of human rights. It just doesn’t work.
Sikkink stresses the importance of economic rights and the reduction of poverty and inequality of fully realizing human rights, and explains how street activists, NGOs, jurists, and bureaucrats all have a role to play in holding leaders at all level to account.
“Evidence for Hope” is a very timely read, and—something that many people need this year—an uplifting one.
Looking around the world today, one can often feel as though human rights are on the retreat—with new political figures like Trump and Duterte, aggressive attacks on civil society in places like Russia and Israel, attacks on the press by states and on indigenous populations by states and extractive corporations, not to mention the atrocities committed by groups like ISIS. The list goes on.
And there can often be a disingenuousness in human rights discourse—when countries absolve their allies of responsibility for human rights (see the US’s double standard on Iran and Saudi Arabia, for one), when Saudi Arabia gets to chair the UN Human Rights Council, when countries like the US get to commit war crimes with impunity, and when the mantra of “human rights” is invoked to justify wars that always seem to make the problems worse. Human rights discourse and practice can be attacked by those who don’t care and those who protest the sanctimonious of those who don’t care. But is there no hope left for human rights?
Don’t give up so easily, counsels Sikkink, a Professor of Human Rights Policy at the Harvard Kennedy School. In this book, she sets out to (1) respond to the critics of the legitimacy and effectiveness of human rights, (2) highlight the diverse political origins of human rights, (3) convey the advances that have been made through human rights advocacy and activism, and (4) chart a path forward.
Sikkink, well-versed in Latin American history, stresses the contributions of Latin American jurists, academics, and activists to landmark documents in the history of human rights, like the UN Declaration of Human Rights. Countries from the Global South were the main advocates of the inclusion of strong human rights language—not the US and Europe, as many might mistakenly think. And, as she explains in her chapter on Cold War struggles, human rights advocacy has a robust history in the Latin American left, where it was essential to pushing back against right-wing dictatorships.
Sikkink faults those who criticize the effectiveness of human rights of relying on a comparison to the ideal, rather than analyzing empirical progress. She highlights the many ways in which, over the past seventy years, we have made advances toward realizing the goals expressed in the UDHR and in bringing some accountability to the crimes committed in the Cold War (and since). Human rights activists will often be disappointed because there is so much work left to do, and because the concept of human rights is expandable. We are always broadening our idea of what counts as a “right,” so the bar is always being set higher. But an understanding of victories past is vital to being able to fight the good fight in the present and future without resorting to despair.
Sikkink points out the fundamental flaws of the logic so often invoked by humanitarian interventionists in the US. War, as Sikkink makes clear, is one of the prime causes of human rights violations. So war as a solution to human rights violations is a stretch. That doesn’t mean that war is *never* justified; the hurdle should just be set very high because there’s a strong chance that more damage will be done in the process.
One of Sikkink’s most striking observations is how the rhetoric used against Islamic fundamentalist terrorism in the post-9/11 era strongly resembles the rhetoric used against communists in Latin America during the Cold War. Demonization combined with a belief that ends justify the means can only lead to disaster. With human rights, the ends and means must be the same; you cannot violate human rights for the sake of human rights. It just doesn’t work.
Sikkink stresses the importance of economic rights and the reduction of poverty and inequality of fully realizing human rights, and explains how street activists, NGOs, jurists, and bureaucrats all have a role to play in holding leaders at all level to account.
“Evidence for Hope” is a very timely read, and—something that many people need this year—an uplifting one.
Displaying 1 - 7 of 7 reviews