I love EFT. But Johnson's over use of alliteration (e.g. Daemon Dialog, Solis Sex, Sealed Off Sex, Synchronized Sex and much more) nearly killed me! Im no literary critic. But geez! Enough already! I know it sounds like a petty gripe, or trivial thing to focus on given the uplifting nature of the subject matter, and perhaps it is. But like I said, this book is loaded with corn dork phrases and it really disrupted my engagement with this book.
There is literally 0% chance I would ever use that type of alliterative language in session with a client, in a classroom with my students, or in private with my wife. The EFT constructs represented by the alliterations are sound (nay spectacular) and I will definitely integrate them into my practice, in my work as an educator, and in my personal life. But I will definitely re-language (thank you Oprah, for popularizing that useful neologism) all of it, in order to be able to communicate it with a straight face.
I understand that these types of mnemonic devices are important, in fact I'm a big fan of them. For instance, Daniel Siegel's work is lousy with them, he loves anagrams (e.g. SNAG = stimulate neuronal activation and growth). Perhaps it's just a matter of taste, but when he does it it works for me (except his song in Mindsight about mirror neurons, sung to the tune of Goin To Carolina In My Mind, that shit was cringe eliciting corn).
I'm a huge fan of acceptance commitment therapy, and employ ACT metaphors and analogies. If you go with George Lakoff and Mark Johnson's work, (see Metaphors We Live By,1980) and I do, than you understand that even the most abstract language and thought processes are literally built on/ made out of metaphors. This is a roundabout way of saying that I love metaphor, and I use it all the time in psychotherapy interventions, classroom instruction, and every day meaning making and problem solving.
This is all an even rounder about way of saying that I am not allergic to creative language. Quite the opposite. I'm always shopping for effective ways to communicate and remember the (often times dismally abstract) constructs and findings that power good psychotherapy. That is, I suppose, the real reason I am a little fixated on, and disappointed by this particular aspect of this particular book.
I will say that Johnson's tango analogy for adult attachment style is quite lovely, and it hit home for me. But even there, the tango can elicit some horrible and cliché images. I like to think I know a thing or two about the real spirit of the tango, so I will use this metaphor privately. But probably not publicly, at least not without a little video clip of some authentic tango.
I call it C.B.N.Q (close but not quite) for Hold Me Tight. I will certainly shop for other popularizations of emotion focused therapy to recommend to friends, students and clients. I'm going to continue to read and practice in the EFT model, but I think the next book I pick will be from Less Greenberg. Perhaps he's a better writer for me.