I don't know where to start with this text. Its transphobic/reproductive-centered approach to womanhood and femininity? Its easy dismissal of cultural appropriation? Its absurd disapproval of more or less all modern medicine, and particularly the use of hormonal birth control? Its blatant misunderstanding of history? Its relative lack of any actually useful information on paganism/witchcraft?
Which is, essentially to say, that I found this book summarily awful.
There's a lot a person can do when tying to update and re-imagine the concept of the witch. This bizarre, "pussy" obsessed version is not one of them. For any woman, cis or trans, who doesn't obsess over sex, who has a complicated relationship with their genitals (or lack there of) that can't just be written off with a lackadaisical, "but they're where ALL my power sits!!!"; who is infertile or surgically altered, just know...this book does very little to make you feel valid as a magical practitioner. You may read it and disagree (and I suppose that's a good thing, if it turns out the book is more inclusive than I thought), but know this book emphasizes over and over again how necessary vaginas, ovaries, wombs, and clitorises are to womanhood and magic-making. So if you don't have those things, or do and would rather you didn't, I wouldn't recommend this text. (Note: I myself am cis--if a trans/nonbinary person thinks I've overstepped, let me know so I can correct myself.)
This book is also very white. The author is of Romani descent (and she uses the term g*psy constantly--her prerogative as a member of that community, but something I want to mention either way), but she's also part Traveller, and she considers herself white. The picture in the back supports that notion, and her carefree way of picking from cultural traditions that are not hers without second thought and encouraging her readers to do the same, fits right in line with white (patriarchal) ideology. She's not concerned with making people of color feel safe in her book, and as a woman of color, I took a lot of issue with that.
Reading this book was a struggle for me, and its scary to think there are people who believe this is what a modern witch needs to be like. This version of magic and spirituality is exclusive and alarming. This version of history is whitewashed and incomplete. This version of womanhood is reductive and offensive. Also she quotes Joss Whedon like he's not a terrible example of "male feminism" and that's honestly the last straw for me.
ETA: A couple of folks in the comments have asked how this book is transphobic. I’ve decided to take one for the team and look back into this book to find some example of transphobic language. I’ll post some quotes and then talk a little further about it.
- “The witch is a woman fully in her power.
She’s in touch with the dark. She knows how to be the witness, how to let things go and how to follow her own counsel. Most importantly, though, she questions EVERYTHING.
She’s connected, pussy to the Earth.”
- “And it’s our wholeness, our intuition, our magic and our power—the power that lies between our thighs—that will truly change the world.”
- “So, waking and reclaiming the witch takes really big ovaries.
If you want to do this, it takes a womb-deep recognition that you are:
- A woman who is powerful. You bleed for five days and don’t die: don’t tell me that doesn’t make you a superhero.”
- “I thought:
...I’ll piss off the transgender community for not addressing them either.
Yet this is the work I do.
I do women’s work, and I’m definitely not going to apologize for that.
That thought? That need to apologize? That’s the very reason I HAVE to write this book.
What I write is not intended to exclude others. But trying to be all-inclusive would totally miss the point. It would feel like I was bypassing the particular story that I believe needs to be told; because while some incredible, brave and courageous women have come before us and paved the way, there’s still a lot of work to be done.”
There’s more. This is just from the introduction.
Some may argue that because Lister has acknowledged her exclusion of trans women in her conversation, she’s covered her ass in terms of being problematic. But saying “I can’t include everyone, I can only share my perspective” is not the same thing as actively insisting womanhood—NOT just cis womanhood, but womanhood in general—only refers people with vaginas, wombs, and menstrual cycles at every available turn. You may say, “This book isn’t for trans women!” And that would be true. But that makes it...transphobic. It’s a hostile read for any woman who doesn’t boast the right body parts Lister argues are necessary for magical empowerment. And if she’s cool ostracizing an entire aspect of the pagan/Wiccan/witchcraft community in her book, then there needs to be a more up front acceptance that her text is blatantly phobic to trans people. That’s how transphobia works. If you write a book that explicitly links womanhood to cis anatomy, then you and your book are transphobic.
Thanks for coming to my TedTalk.