This work has been selected by scholars as being culturally important, and is part of the knowledge base of civilization as we know it. This work was reproduced from the original artifact, and remains as true to the original work as possible. Therefore, you will see the original copyright references, library stamps (as most of these works have been housed in our most important libraries around the world), and other notations in the work.
This work is in the public domain in the United States of America, and possibly other nations. Within the United States, you may freely copy and distribute this work, as no entity (individual or corporate) has a copyright on the body of the work.
As a reproduction of a historical artifact, this work may contain missing or blurred pages, poor pictures, errant marks, etc. Scholars believe, and we concur, that this work is important enough to be preserved, reproduced, and made generally available to the public. We appreciate your support of the preservation process, and thank you for being an important part of keeping this knowledge alive and relevant.
Christopher Henry Dawson (12 October 1889, Hay Castle – 25 May 1970, Budleigh Salterton) was a British independent scholar, who wrote many books on cultural history and Christendom. Christopher H. Dawson has been called "the greatest English-speaking Catholic historian of the twentieth century".
Some chapters, or rather articles, are much more interesting than others, in my point of view. The more interesting ones are so because they are easily understood by general readers like myself. The rest are those articles that seem to address exclusively the academic class and their particular professional concerns. In both cases Dawson writes beautifully and incisively. And most uncanny of all, he had a knack for accurate predicting of future cultural scenarios that affect the West today, which can only be attributed to his massive knowledge of history and understanding of historical developments. Seldom does one find somebody endowed with both massive knowledge and talent to communicate it.
Speaking of the process of secularization of the West in 1942: "There is no longer any need for nationalism or class feeling or economic motives to disguise themselves in the dress of religion, for they have become the conscious and dominant forces in social life. The ideologies which today form the opposite poles of social tension are not religious, but political, national, and economic ones, which have cut across, and largely obliterated the older sociological and religious divisions which separated Catholic and Protestant Europe". In the same article Dawson, with all the dark notes pointed out about our state of affairs in the West, he never seems to lose faith or even to transmit pessimism, even though his message's implications are dark indeed, his tone comes calm and hopeful through all his pages: "...unity by forcing Christians together, as it were, in spite of themselves." This simple sentence is a lesson on how to say a lot in just a few words; and the implications are at the same time tragic and hopeful. And how true they've become! Just look at the shape of the West, especially Europe, since 2001, look into the Muslim macho dictatorships all over the world...
Look at this: "The three main substitutes for religion in the modern age, Democracy, Socialism, and Nationalism ... still arouse a genuinely religious emotion. It is religious emotion divorced from religious belief." It is reading Dawson and seeing Europe's malaise at the same time. The Muslim woman-beaters are at the doors of Europe and what do we do? Leave it to the U.N.; we really deserve that Muslims come and take over (but I hope not).
An irrefutable message to all hedonists around: "It is the fundamental error of the modern hedonist to believe that man can abandon moral effort and throw off every repression and spiritual discipline and yet preserve all the achievements of culture. It is the lesson of history that the higher the achievement of a culture the greater is the moral effort and the stricter is the social discipline that it demands." If you think the above statement is wrong because you still hang on to Greece as the evidence of a cultured society where pedophiles and sodomites thrive, think twice: "This aversion to marriage and the deliberate restriction of the family by the practice of infanticide and abortion was undoubtedly the main cause of the decline of Greece, as Polybius pointed out in the second century B.C."
Dawson sees the whole picture of world history, but never sounds like he is lecturing. He rather sounds like a friendly couch conversationalist. Dawson cannot be easily labeled and done away with, not then, and not even now. He would not fit the strict political categorizations of today, in the sense of being a liberal or a conservative. His vision of the world and world history is honest, calm, and Catholic. Like myself, you may have political differences with Dawson as a result of your own preferences, but his analysis of history strictly speaking, is impeccable. Past and present are so connected in his analyses that you seem both seem to be one, and if you stop to think, that's just how history should be taught: as a unifying frame, not as a sequence of independent events taking place in time.
Family plays a big role in Dawson's view of history, as opposed to welfare state, "... the breaking down of the old structure of society and the loss of the traditional moral standards without creating anything which can take their place. As in the decline of the ancient world, the family is steadily losing its form and its social significance, and the state absorbs more and more of the life of its members ... the state educates the children and takes the responsibility for their maintenance and health. Consequently, the father no longer holds a vital position in the family."
Weirdly so, I would say, we are looking more and more like the Muslim families, only with the father and mother roles changed. An exaggeration, but one gets the idea.
This was a collection of his essays arranged by topic in a very coherent way. This is the first I have read of his writings and I was blown away. I heard mention of him from time to time and now know why. Such a brilliant mind.
This is another example of a title and a blurb that completely misleads. ‘Dynamics of World History’ promises a view that does justice to the complexity of (past) reality. And the introduction by Dermot Quin also underlines that. Enticing! But unfortunately, it wasn't until I actually started Dawson's book that I realized this was a collection of loose essays and articles, some of them going back as far as the 1920s, and written in a language and a vision that has become embarrassingly outdated. For instance, the author begins with the proposition that history is determined by 3 factors, of which race is the first. And he classifies among the lowest cultures those of the “Negroid and Mongoloid race”. I know, in the late 19th and early 20th century this was accepted, even scientifically based language. But for me it was enough to close this book. Maybe I'm doing Dawson an injustice, and he had more interesting things to say, but with such outdated assumptions I didn't want to put my energy into it anymore.
A Christian is like a red rag to a bull—to the force of evil that seeks to be master of the world and which, in a limited sense, but in a very real sense, is, as St. John says, the Lord of this world. And not only the individual but the Church as an historic community follows the same pattern and finds its success and failure not where the politician finds them, but where Christ found them.
An engaging collection of essays by Christopher Dawson. Dawson held the chair of Catholic Studies at Harvard, where he was the first to receive the title.
Dawson is sometimes described in terms of St. Augustine. His other books of history often emphasize the importance of the pre-Medieval barbarians to Western culture. Dawson here presents his most significant insights into the meaning of world-history. He criticizes pure social science, the idea of progress and outlines the role of religion for social development. Religion, he thinks, is the cornerstone of any civilization. Culture cannot be divorced from “cult”.
Dawson wrote during a time when grandiose tomes of history were being written by intellectual giants from Toynbee to Spengler to Marx. Histories that encompassed every world event, then abstracted historical "theories of everything", included some of the more important books read or written during the first half of the 20th century. In the Dynamics of World History Dawson looks at each of these works in turn, while paying particular attention to St. Augustine who can be said to have invented the genre with The City of God.
My favorite essay from the collection is "Catholicism and the Bourgeois Mind". Dawson contrasts the baroque or Medieval spirit of Catholicism with the commercial ideals of the merchant middle classes that arose at the time of the Enlightenment or industrial revolution especially.
Here is a line that captures the above contrast from Dawson:
“The ideal of the bourgeois culture is to maintain a respectable average standard. Its maxims are: “Honesty is the best policy,” “Do as you would be done by,” “The greatest happiness for the greatest number.” But the baroque spirit lives in and for the triumphant moment of creative ecstasy. It will have all or nothing. Its maxims are: “All for love and the world well lost,” “Nada, nada, nada,” “What dost thou seek for, O my soul? All is thine, all is for thee, do not take less, nor rest with the crumbs that fall from the table of thy Father. Go forth, and exult in thy glory, hide thyself in it and rejoice, and thou shalt obtain all the desires of thy heart.”
An excellent collection of essays that provide an eclectic introduction to Dawson's thought.
This is one of the classic books on philosophy of science, worthy of figuring together with Oswald Spengler's Decline of the West, J.B. Toynbee's Study of history, A.L. Kroeber's Configuration of culture growth and Pitirim Sorokin's Social and cultural dynamics.
The book is a collection of papers published by Dawson during over 30 years. They make a coherent set and show an interesting consistency in the author's mindset along all that time.
I was shocked when I found some of the ideas I offered in my book Evolution and human cultures (1979) had previously been suggested by Dawson over 40 years before! Of course, I didn't know when I wrote that book, I've just read Dawson's book now.
SECTION I: The Sociological Foundations of History 1. The Sources of Culture Change 2. Sociology as a Science 3. Sociology and the Theory of Progress 4. Civilization and Morals 5. Progress and Decay in Ancient and Modern Civilization 6. Art and Society 7. Vitality or Standardization in Culture 8. Cultural Polarity and Religious Schism 9. Prevision in Religion 10. T. S. Eliot on the Meaning of Culture
SECTION II: The Movement of World History 1. Religion and the Life of Civilization 2. The Warrior Peoples and the Decline of the Archaic Civilization 3. The Origins of Classical Civilization 4. The Patriarchal Family in History 5. Stages in Mankind's Religious Experience
SECTION III: Urbanism and the Organic Nature of Culture 1. The Evolution of the Modern City 2. Catholicism and the Bourgeois Mind 3. The World Crisis and the English Tradition 4. Bolshevism and the Bourgeoisie
PART TWO: Conceptions of World History
SECTION I: Christianity and the Meaning of History 1. The Christian View of History 2. History and the Christian Revelation 3. Christianity and Contradiction in History 4. The Kingdom of God and History
SECTION II: The Vision of the Historian 1. The Problem of Metahistory 2. St. Augustine and the City of God 3. Edward Gibbon and the Fall of Rome 4. Karl Marx and the Dialectic of History 5. H. G.Wells and the Outline of History 6. Oswald Spengler and the Life of Civilizations 7. Arnold Toynbee and the Study of History 8. Europe in Eclipse
Afterword: Continuity and Development in Christopher Dawson's Thought
"The Dynamics of World History" is a book by British historian Christopher Dawson, first published in 1957. In this work, Dawson offers a broad survey of world history, examining the forces and factors that have shaped the development of human civilization.
Dawson argues that human history is characterized by a dynamic interplay of religious, cultural, and social forces, and that these forces have been shaped by a variety of factors, including geography, technology, and economics. He contends that an understanding of these forces and their interactions is essential to understanding the broader patterns of world history.
"The Dynamics of World History" is organized around several key themes, including the role of religion in shaping human history, the relationship between culture and society, and the impact of technological and economic change on human civilization. Dawson draws on a wide range of historical and cultural sources to support his arguments, including the history of Europe, Asia, and the Middle East.
The book offers a challenging and complex analysis of world history, and has been influential in shaping contemporary debates about the nature of human civilization and the forces that have shaped its development. Dawson's work is known for its depth and insight, and remains an important contribution to the field of world history.