i'm not going to say that this was my favorite book by any means. having said that, i have nothing but respect for the author. i can appreciate that this is a very influential novel in terms of style and candor. without it, we might not have the other great writers of japanese nostalgia, etc. great. SPOILER ALERT, btw.
if i were around when this was published, i'd propose to the author (if i may be so bold) that he should name each of the four sections of the book. part one: kensaku as snob. part two: kensaku as bitch. part three: kensaku as sap. part four: kensaku as complete a**hole.
i hope i'm not the only one that saw kensaku as an antihero throughout the entire book. he acts like such a baby, is completely socially awkward and ridiculous. in this, he's like a japanese larry david, except not nearly as funny. ok, he's nothing like larry david.
i was also under the impression that shiga used the text as a soapbox for his own criticisms on various art, some of which are based on uneducated misunderstandings of the artistic medium in which he criticized. par example, he poo-poos schubert's erlkönig, and then, in the same breath, goethe. 'oh, but maeterlinck knows how to treat death because he's belgian (read: french), and, since i'm japanese, germanic art is meaningless and shallow.' we can't see through you, shiga؟
ok, so part four. kensaku develops into this beast of a character, like the social bull in a china shop. he and naoko (she's so weak-willed - they're perfect together) have a baby together - naonori. that's a sick name, btw. the thing dies a bit later, so naturally there's going to be this sadness. but kensaku is one step ahead of you. he's so charming that he bitches his wife out: 'srsly?! ur crying? stfu! who cares about the bebe? that's so last week. oei needs help, so i'm gonna peace out for a bit but i'll bbl. k thx baii! nevermind that ur my wife and i'm supposed to support you. wait, support, what's that? i didn't have a real dad (sad face)' and then naoko is like 'well, alright, you're right. k bye ima cheat on u but don't be hatin'.' so then he gets back and he's like 'no, that's cool u cheated. no big. but ima push u from the train and u'll be lights out for a bit, but then i'll take off so u finally don't have to deal with me for a year, wait, six months. might come back in three. we'll see. anyway ima go again. don't cheat k thx bai.' then he goes out hiking and gets all owwy and naoko rushes to his side cuz he's got cholera but only maybe. are we supposed to feel sorry for him? hope not cuz i don't. and i won't. and neither will you if you read it. i get the impression that shiga is genuinely trying to get the reader to be on kensaku's side the whole time, but knows it's a totally uphill battle and that we're all in the same sinking ship.
part of me wants to label this book under fantasy literature because there's such a strong connection with one of the particular conventions of 'fat-girl fantasy' - i.e. that the characters surrounding the main character will still be friends with, go out of their way for, and/or pine over someone who is a) completely boring, b) a complete imbecile, c) a shallow loser, and/or d) a completely aimless freak with no social skills. (cf. heralds of valdemar trilogy by mercedes lackey and the twlight series by stephanie meyer)
3½ stars because, despite the rants, i actually did really enjoy the book. (i think the book is meant to bring out this type of discourse - this is in fact exactly what makes it 'good'.)
ps does anyone else see the irony in that he's staying at a buddhist temple at the end and got IM-bombed by karma? (ah, the days of IM...now that's real nostalgia!)