Okay, I'm a sucker for a book about serial killers, and this one was on sale - and just look at the title! Sadly, it was not to be. There was a certain amount of touchy-feely psychotherapy going on in the beginning, which was fine; the author is a psychologist, these things happen. However, the book didn't feel quite right, though I couldn't put my finger on it. And then, Chapter Four - Serial Killers Today. It's a long list of serial killers since the 1960s (the Sixties ruin everything!), which includes the Zodiac killer. And I quote: "murdered...several children....Given the name 'zodiac' by the police because he carved the signs of the zodiac into the bodies of his victims."
False, and false. This is not the first book about serial killers I have read, Dr. Norris! I went straight to my other book on the Zodiac killer (yes!), plus fact-checked on the internet, and indeed, the above is not in the least true (unless you consider people in their late teens and early to mid-twenties to be children, which is not usually what's implied by the word). At that point, reading the book became sort of pointless. If you are writing a book about serial killers, and can't get the basic facts right, why should I buy into your theory about the epidemic of serial killing caused by broken homes and angry mothers (I may be oversimplifying, but there's definitely a mommy subtext which is a little disturbing)? Also, stop calling Manson a serial killer and filing him in with people who actually, I dunno, killed someone. Crazy horrible person, yes. Actual hands-on killer, no.
Anyway - I skimmed after that, but it wasn't really worth reading given that I couldn't trust even the basics. It gets two stars because it was somewhat interesting, but I can't really say it was either educational or scientific. Or accurate. okay, one star; I talked me into it.