Rachel Anne Williams’ Transgressive delved into the life and experience of trans women through the lens of queer theory and lived experience. She’s also delivering her thoughts as an ex-philosopher which provides an interesting background. The text itself is intended to be read as the reader wishes rather than in a linear fashion; Williams appreciates that you might not necessarily require everything that her book offers.
Each chapter is around 1000 words, and they read much like blog posts. They are short and to the point, but some could have done with a little finer tuning as it was clear that they had just been copied and pasted from her blog rather than re-worked.
At times, Williams is blunt. She will not pander to her readers, and I appreciate this. There are far too many Trans 101 texts that fail to acknowledge the harsh realities that can come with being transgender, particularly being a trans woman or trans woman of colour.
Williams is willing to be completely transparent about her journey, and through the text you can see her finding her feet and her voice. Some chapters are more captivating than others, and I thoroughly enjoyed chapter 6 ‘Being an Angry Tranny’ where she explains that academics, and in particular ‘white cis straight males’, have a ‘tendency to treat pressing social problems as curious thought experiments.’ I have known female scientists to take a similar stance and view my life as a live experiment that will unfold in front of them over the next few years. That was more than uncomfortable, and I had to take time to assess whether I wanted to keep them in my life and how to convey the severity of the things that they had said.
Her views on non-binary people were disappointing, and she states that ‘many trans people themselves, view the non-binary movement with scepticism and disdain.’ Her personal stance is that the movement is ‘neither good nor bad. It is simply the evolution of modern queer culture. It’s a fact. It’s happening. I see it happening all around me. As I see it, we have three options. We can: (1) Fight it (2) Promote it or (3) Be neutral.’
The chapter is concluded by her saying that her ‘promotion’ of the movement ‘is merely the logical conclusion of neutrality: this is where things are heading and I don’t want to be on the wrong side of history.’ It’s disheartening and potentially damaging.
Throughout the book, we also see Williams suggest that trans men have an easier existence, often because she considers them to pass more easily. It’s exhausting for this argument to continually crop up in books on the trans experience, especially when there is such a lack of depth to the argument.
I think that Williams should have written a more extended piece on both the non-binary identity and the privileges experienced by trans men, as it is difficult to have a well-reasoned discussion in a thousand or so words; it’s far more nuanced than that. In her introduction, she states that she is open to discussion surrounding anything contained within her book, so I might contact her for clarification.
Delving further into the book, I wondered if I should complete it as her opinions had sparked genuine anger and frustration. I decided to continue in the hope that more of her arguments and discussions would resonate with me. It was a mixed bag.
Writing about herself and her experiences with gender and identity are the strongest areas of the text. Later in the work, Williams explores the concept of ‘gender agnosticism’ which ‘is the refusal to claim certainty that I know what my “true sex” or “true gender” is.’ This chapter was a refreshing read, and echoes sentiments by Juno Roche in Trans Power, who identifies as trans rather than trying to contort into an identity that doesn’t fit. Williams doesn’t attempt to overwrite the identity of others and understands ‘that many trans people take solace in gender gnosticism, the certainty they feel in knowing their gender.’ I won’t say that it was a flawlessly articulated argument, but it can act as an opening to discussion, which is what this book is about.
One of the final chapters, ‘Queering Personal Finance’, argues that ‘There is a tendency in queer/leftist circles to think that personal finance is for rich white conservatives and no one else.’ Williams goes on to suggest that a ‘$5 Starbucks’ will destroy our budgets, and that you should have an emergency fund that covers 3-6 months and should be at least $1000. The way she presents this is heavy-handed and judgmental.
Williams is effectively guilt-tripping readers as she writes ‘you are essentially saying the risk of financial ruin is worth the latest chef’s offerings.’ Statements like this are vile and vilify poor people who wish to make small purchases with the disposable income that comes their way. I’m one of those people who is forced to live month to month, and saving isn’t an option. I’m not bad with money, I just don’t make enough. So, if I find it in my budget to eat out, I’m going to. I’d much rather have that experience than be desperately gathering pennies for an emergency fund and living miserably. Also, $1000 in London is barely going to cover a month of rent and utilities, I’d need at least $3000-4000, and that’s impossible on my salary unless I saved for years.
Whilst I do agree that ‘We need to normalise frugality, budgeting, retirement, and investing in queer/leftist circles’, this is not the way to convey your point. It’s reads as hastily written and provides very little guidance as to how you can get to a point where saving is viable. There are people in far worse situations than I, and this should have been an opportunity to guide rather than scold.
Overall, Transgressive is an interesting read, but it’s not the first book that I would recommend. You might enjoy this if you’re seeking more accessible pieces that you can dip in and out of. Whilst I might not agree with everything Williams has to say, her arguments are, for the most part, well constructed and her views on gender and identity are genuinely interesting, and I am curious to see if gender agnosticism resounds with others.
*I received a free copy of this via NetGalley for review*