§ The first time around Not Me, these poems provided me with a scaffolding that provided me with some level of discomfort given some of my own attitudes of a political nature. Let me explain. Firstly, this scaffolding appeared in my initial reading as a kind of poetic ledger testifying to the female’s bleak state or social position in the world, but perhaps more specifically, in American social constructs. I became hesitant of what I was being told: I thought identity politics was again being flogged to death by an insistence for recognition in the social sphere. I’m not insensitive to the plight of identity politics, but rather weary of its societal implications to bind ourselves to a fixed idea of ourselves exclusive of others. But as my reading intensified, I noticed a glimmer of something more complex than the whiny body of self-declarative assertions of self and outspoken sexual preferences. As in the poem, “A Poem,” “Life is a vow that frightens as it deepens.” The vow that Myles imagines is embedded in the poems almost peripatetic quality, where as Robert Creeley once said, the poet thinks with the poem. Here, Myles walks us through her poems, while enacting that walking through the poems themselves.
§ As a whole, the poems do bemoan the exclusion of others off the social map in a way that narrates a lament that includes what we might call the collective citizenry. For instance, in the poem, “The Sadness of Leaving,” the speaker says “I’m terrified/to go & you/won’t miss me/I’m terrified by the/bright blues of/the subway/other days I’m/so happy &/prepared to believe/that everyone walking/down the street is/someone I know.” This poem, informed by a cosmopolitan setting, charts the complexities of emotion that don’t simply belong to ones understanding of self, but that extend to include the outside of social affairs as indicted by the “bright blues of/the subway…” The cityscape is not just a textual strategy for the poem, but the very site of poet’s process of thought. As Myles’ poems present, the city provides a collectivity where reciprocity is often relegated to ones imagination. In other words, it becomes the dream within the dream.
§ Another aspect of Myles’ poems I wish to present is the usage of plain spoken language. One reviewer of Not Me has aptly said that “very seldom do her words call attention to their wordness.” There is certainly a way that these poems can be read quickly while losing much of their substance, but I would argue that if the poems carry any deceptions for a reader, it’s in the diction, which is strikingly quotidian. Thus, that the poem is made of words and, of course, our experiences are always mediated by language. While, for me, the wordness of the poems is apparent, Myles’ terse lines allow for a kind of recasting of time by the simple turning of one phrase or statement into the other, thereby changing the scope of a reader’s attention. The gaze upon the text is directed downward, where transience follows by way of a poem’s form. Here, time has as much to do with the pacing of thought, and the utterances of narration and their personas.
§ Lastly, Myles successfully merges the private with the public. I am not willing to assume that the private is independent of history or economic and social statuses, however, as far as national boundaries are concerned, Myles is working in a particular American vein, but one inflected with a radical otherness. While the poems are quite aware of their limitations to change anything, they do emit this exuberance that the poem itself can be a political act of conscience or perhaps interrogate the cultural forms as they exist around us. From “Hot Night” the speakers says “My/poetry is here/for the haul,/the lonely woman’s/tool—we have/tools now, we/have words &/lists, we have/real tears now,/absence, rage &/missing you is/not possible in/the New York/rain because/your name/is caught between/the drops &/I might throw up…” While the utterance of this passage seems to begin as a private confession, its movement asserts a social position made explicit by the “New York rain,” and the complexities of that position to name “caught between drops.” As in this poem, Myles enacts a poetics not of alterity, but of mapping the quotidian in a way that’s spatially alert to inner and outer locations. These locations have to do with identity and acceptance of difference, but in Myles’ poems, the insistence on speculating the ills of our time is conducted through concrete. In other words, the poems are not other-worldly, but of our time and contain multiplicities and contradictions in regard to self, culture, and nation.