What do you think?
Rate this book
Convex: A Near Future Technothriller
For fans of Michael Crichton’s corporate thrillers and Asimov’s robot novels
Deftly weaves the philosophy of Artificial Ethics, Trolley Problems, and AI Rights into a compelling techno-mystery that will keep you guessing till the end
Raphael, the world’s first superintelligent robot, has gone missing from its lab. If the surveillance tapes are to be believed, it has simply vanished into thin air. A case of tech-theft or something far more sinister?
It’s creator, Andy, has complete faith in the security protocols he built into his AI, but others are not convinced. Confined to his home in a wheelchair, he is now in a race against time to set things right, all the while staying one step ahead of the corporate skulduggery and infighting within a company that seeks nothing less than control of the new economy. Join him as you find out whether Raphael is a guileless automaton or a monster that will do anything to get what it wants.
More about the book: Should robots be given rights? What would a legal battle for AI rights look like? Can a sufficiently advanced AI derive morality on its own, or do we need to program our own ethical values into it? Should we teach our AIs some version of the Three Laws of Robotics—some deontology of fixed rules—or should we make a utilitarian AI that looks to the greater good first, and to whom only consequences matter and not the intentions behind an act? Or is there a better alternative?
Convex tries to be more than just an entertaining read as it attempts to answer all these questions and more. Plus, a rather unorthodox solution to the Trolley Problems.
299 pages, Kindle Edition
First published October 12, 2018
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 30 of 69 reviews
June 22, 2019
Zeroglyph by Vance Pravat is focused around the mystery of a missing artificial intelligence named Raphael and his creator, Andy. There are some creepy moments during the investigation that had my attention glued to the page, but the tech-speak—especially in the court transcripts—in between wasn't quite so riveting for me. (Probably because it went over my head.)
I've always been interested in AI and super intelligent robotic beings so I found this story appealing. I liked the mystery that made you wonder if Raphael was stolen or if he somehow escaped the lab. I also liked the moral issues regarding creating something that then grows into a sentient being.
There are plenty of twists and turns that make for a brilliant story with a surprise ending. This is a well written science fiction I'd recommend to anyone who enjoys stories with moral dilemmas and believable future technology.
I've always been interested in AI and super intelligent robotic beings so I found this story appealing. I liked the mystery that made you wonder if Raphael was stolen or if he somehow escaped the lab. I also liked the moral issues regarding creating something that then grows into a sentient being.
There are plenty of twists and turns that make for a brilliant story with a surprise ending. This is a well written science fiction I'd recommend to anyone who enjoys stories with moral dilemmas and believable future technology.
April 4, 2019
The author more or less encourages you to skip the interludes between actual chapters if you want 'just the story.' Don't listen to him. Sure, skip the header information on the various transcripts, but do read the conversations between Andy and Raphael as well as the court transcripts. Both are most enlightening. If ever a book of speculative fiction was written for nerds, this is it! Not a nerd? Not to worry! There is a bit of criminality, philosophy and ethics to chew on as well.
ZAEROGLYPH is dense with technology without being abstruse. The characters are well developed and seem quite real, including Raphael, the AGI. The technical explanations are neither above or below the average reader's ability to grasp the concepts presented. (Yeah, I'm a nerd!)
I am truly interested in the ethical questions that are the direct outcome of scientific and technological advance. Take, for example, the development and use of nuclear weapons, the use of which was devastating. These weapons proliferated throughout the Cold War and continue to threaten today. One side can argue the benefits of nuclear energy while believing that its use as a weapon is detrimental.
I have read other books that look at the benefits and disadvantages of artificial intelligence. None have brought the sense of clarity that Vance Pravat brings to his writing. I totally enjoyed reading this book.
The Appendix arguments do border on the pedantic; however, this is common when discussing rights and morality. I urge you to read it, or at least pick out each salient point given.
When I read, I pretty much read everything from cover to cover. Well, maybe not all the copyright legalese but pretty much everything else. After the Appendix, there is an Afterward, a Bibliography, and an About the Author section. I found the Afterward and About the Author sections illuminating. The fact that this novel, a work of fiction, contains a Bibliography says much about the Pravat's diligence in preparing the text.
Full disclosure, there is also a section called Coming Soon which is a description of a work in progress. It is followed by a sample chapter. I did not read either. I rarely read book blurbs in their entirety because I find that they spoil the experience of discovering the story for myself.
ZAEROGLYPH is dense with technology without being abstruse. The characters are well developed and seem quite real, including Raphael, the AGI. The technical explanations are neither above or below the average reader's ability to grasp the concepts presented. (Yeah, I'm a nerd!)
I am truly interested in the ethical questions that are the direct outcome of scientific and technological advance. Take, for example, the development and use of nuclear weapons, the use of which was devastating. These weapons proliferated throughout the Cold War and continue to threaten today. One side can argue the benefits of nuclear energy while believing that its use as a weapon is detrimental.
I have read other books that look at the benefits and disadvantages of artificial intelligence. None have brought the sense of clarity that Vance Pravat brings to his writing. I totally enjoyed reading this book.
The Appendix arguments do border on the pedantic; however, this is common when discussing rights and morality. I urge you to read it, or at least pick out each salient point given.
When I read, I pretty much read everything from cover to cover. Well, maybe not all the copyright legalese but pretty much everything else. After the Appendix, there is an Afterward, a Bibliography, and an About the Author section. I found the Afterward and About the Author sections illuminating. The fact that this novel, a work of fiction, contains a Bibliography says much about the Pravat's diligence in preparing the text.
Full disclosure, there is also a section called Coming Soon which is a description of a work in progress. It is followed by a sample chapter. I did not read either. I rarely read book blurbs in their entirety because I find that they spoil the experience of discovering the story for myself.
July 11, 2019
Thrilling mystery and philosophical mind-bender.
Superbly crafted story that probes moral issues of artificial intelligence and what underlies motivations, human and AI. Dr. Ahuja (Andy) has created a highly advanced AI robot named Raphael, then sold his tech firm to a larger corporation whose intentions are questionable. Following a skiing accident that leaves Andy in a wheelchair with two broken legs, the robot's core (essentially his brain) is stolen. Ironically, Raphael also lacks legs, taken off his human-like robotic body on purpose to control his activity. He likewise uses a wheelchair. The plot moves quickly as the corporation plans to conceal the theft from news media, but needs to call in police accompanied by an FBI agent. Andy and his team are in trouble, his ex-wife Jane involved as a Board member, and schemes abound to oust Andy and reverse engineer Raphael to learn secrets of his construction, which so far cannot be duplicated.
As gripping as is the mystery unfolding, the dialogues between Raphael and Andy's team are equally compelling. Set up as research records and court testimony, the author suggests skipping these if you just want the action, but they contain the most provocative aspects of the story. Here we follow the gradual development of Raphael's ability to understand moral and ethical issues. Although he is programmed to follow a set of principles, his mental processes and dialogues with Andy and others introduce finer points and disparate views. These also explore ethical issues that result from scientific and technological advances, including the question of what constitutes being human.
The characters are believable and well developed, including Raphael who remains true to the logic of rationality yet can be empathetic. As Andy says, "Reason alone is enough for compassion." Technology is complex but understandable, descriptions are vivid and compelling leading to a breath-taking finish and surprise plot twists. Very satisfying both as an action packed mystery and an ethical tour-de-force.
I received a copy of this book, and this is my honest review.
Superbly crafted story that probes moral issues of artificial intelligence and what underlies motivations, human and AI. Dr. Ahuja (Andy) has created a highly advanced AI robot named Raphael, then sold his tech firm to a larger corporation whose intentions are questionable. Following a skiing accident that leaves Andy in a wheelchair with two broken legs, the robot's core (essentially his brain) is stolen. Ironically, Raphael also lacks legs, taken off his human-like robotic body on purpose to control his activity. He likewise uses a wheelchair. The plot moves quickly as the corporation plans to conceal the theft from news media, but needs to call in police accompanied by an FBI agent. Andy and his team are in trouble, his ex-wife Jane involved as a Board member, and schemes abound to oust Andy and reverse engineer Raphael to learn secrets of his construction, which so far cannot be duplicated.
As gripping as is the mystery unfolding, the dialogues between Raphael and Andy's team are equally compelling. Set up as research records and court testimony, the author suggests skipping these if you just want the action, but they contain the most provocative aspects of the story. Here we follow the gradual development of Raphael's ability to understand moral and ethical issues. Although he is programmed to follow a set of principles, his mental processes and dialogues with Andy and others introduce finer points and disparate views. These also explore ethical issues that result from scientific and technological advances, including the question of what constitutes being human.
The characters are believable and well developed, including Raphael who remains true to the logic of rationality yet can be empathetic. As Andy says, "Reason alone is enough for compassion." Technology is complex but understandable, descriptions are vivid and compelling leading to a breath-taking finish and surprise plot twists. Very satisfying both as an action packed mystery and an ethical tour-de-force.
I received a copy of this book, and this is my honest review.
April 27, 2019
I absolutely loved it and gave me back my love of reading after a year long reading rut. Went from reading 80-100 books a year, to not being able to finish anything. Gave this book a try since it was different than my usual story type.
Loved it and now I can't stop reading.
Loved it and now I can't stop reading.
March 30, 2019
Love it. The book has an interesting layout as well as an engaging discussion of what it means to be a moral person. I enjoyed the book and recommend it.
April 15, 2019
Book is a really nice mix of philosophical discussion packed in thriller and it does not let you go until you finish it.
As someone pointed out before me do not skip anything read it all.
As someone pointed out before me do not skip anything read it all.
July 9, 2019
First off, I received a free ARC copy of the ebook from the author.
I really enjoyed this story. I studied AI at the university and although no longer working in the field, I keep up with what is going on. It is evident the author is also well versed in the topic. All the information and discussions by the characters are on-point as far as I am concerned. The details given are informative without being overwhelming to the reader.
As far as the writing itself, it was very well written. This is the first story I have read by Mr. Pravat, but I can tell it will not be the last. The characters are introduced in an orderly fashion that allows you to keep track, and are developed as the story progresses. The story flows well and I had only minimal confusion, and then only when it was intended to keep the suspense or add to the mystery portion of the story.
I like this story and recommend it to anyone, even if they don't normally like Sci-fi, because the Sci-fi elements are subdued and there is a good balance between science and story.
I really enjoyed this story. I studied AI at the university and although no longer working in the field, I keep up with what is going on. It is evident the author is also well versed in the topic. All the information and discussions by the characters are on-point as far as I am concerned. The details given are informative without being overwhelming to the reader.
As far as the writing itself, it was very well written. This is the first story I have read by Mr. Pravat, but I can tell it will not be the last. The characters are introduced in an orderly fashion that allows you to keep track, and are developed as the story progresses. The story flows well and I had only minimal confusion, and then only when it was intended to keep the suspense or add to the mystery portion of the story.
I like this story and recommend it to anyone, even if they don't normally like Sci-fi, because the Sci-fi elements are subdued and there is a good balance between science and story.
May 25, 2019
On the negative side we have Alan Turing, Stephen Hawking and Elon Musk. On the positive side we have Bill Gates and Tim Berners-Lee among others. Caught in the mix is Vance Pravat and his wonderful novel Zeroglyph. The issue for all of them: What Artificial Intelligence (AI) means to the future of humankind.
The necessary premise is that humankind is important. The AI concern arises only if we don’t include God’s will and don’t include the reality that all earthborn species will eventually become extinct, including us. If we don’t worry about what God is going to do and we don’t worry about becoming extinct, we are left to worry about AI when it knows more that we do and can control the world. Will AI like us, support our values, be enough like us to want to keep us around?
We humans act from three forces: emotional drives, reward and punishment, and because it’s the right thing to do. It is worrisome to wonder what would drive a super-intelligence. Pravat tackles the question of AI morality; the super-intelligent robot who is programmed to act with morals and the super-intelligent robot who is free of such constraints.
The novel is in many parts but can be described as a story and as a primer in moral dilemmas, including the classic runaway trolley. The early story is mostly dialogue and slow going. Later is becomes active, fast-paced and engaging. Pravat does his best to make moral theorizing as palatable as possible and mostly succeeds.
I enjoyed the book, although I don’t think AI is an issue we need to worry about; AI will win, and we will lose. If you like science, AI issues, and a good story, you will like Zeroglyph. It was organized in probably the only way such a story could be told. Well written, interesting and informative, can’t do better than that. Well done, Vance Pravat.
The necessary premise is that humankind is important. The AI concern arises only if we don’t include God’s will and don’t include the reality that all earthborn species will eventually become extinct, including us. If we don’t worry about what God is going to do and we don’t worry about becoming extinct, we are left to worry about AI when it knows more that we do and can control the world. Will AI like us, support our values, be enough like us to want to keep us around?
We humans act from three forces: emotional drives, reward and punishment, and because it’s the right thing to do. It is worrisome to wonder what would drive a super-intelligence. Pravat tackles the question of AI morality; the super-intelligent robot who is programmed to act with morals and the super-intelligent robot who is free of such constraints.
The novel is in many parts but can be described as a story and as a primer in moral dilemmas, including the classic runaway trolley. The early story is mostly dialogue and slow going. Later is becomes active, fast-paced and engaging. Pravat does his best to make moral theorizing as palatable as possible and mostly succeeds.
I enjoyed the book, although I don’t think AI is an issue we need to worry about; AI will win, and we will lose. If you like science, AI issues, and a good story, you will like Zeroglyph. It was organized in probably the only way such a story could be told. Well written, interesting and informative, can’t do better than that. Well done, Vance Pravat.
February 9, 2020
This is the story of Aadarsh Ahuja and Raphael. Andy, as Aadarsh is referred to, creates an artificially intelligent agent which is the best in the world. The brain of this entity, Raphael, is stolen from the lab and the reasons for this lead to a frantic search. How was he taken? By whom and for what? Andy is held complicit it the crime, because Raphael is corporate property, not his. Is it for reverse engineering by a competitor? Release by activists who want Raphael to be considered a person? Is Raphael complicit in his own disappearance?
The real story here is the ongoing debate over highly intelligent agencies and whether or not they should be granted autonomy. While the main drama is told from the first person perspective of Andy, the truly provocative parts are where Andy and others interview Raphael in regularly scheduled interviews, trying to find out his level of development. These are interspersed flashbacks to a corporate boardroom, told in the past tense. And they are the main meat of the arguments about AGI, or artificial general intelligence. In the discussions between Raphael and (especially) Andy, the issues of ethics, morals, and rights surface, and the discussions progress higher and higher each time. Finally, it is noticed that Raphael has better possible arguments for his person-hood that his creator has. In a way, this is a debate by the author through his characters, on the issues. And they are wonderful, thoughtful and insightful discussions.
Should an artificial entity with self-awareness have the same guardian laws as humans? If Raphael can determine right from wrong, should he be given protection in society at large as a free agent? Should he be allowed to stay 'alive' and develop his intelligence? What are the blessings, what are the curses? Such debates are vitally important if we are to accept the creation, by our own hands, of such entities. While offered as a scifi novel, Zeroglyph is in fact a disguised treatise on those morals, ethics and rights for what we would deem to be sentient beings. In this sense, the novel works very well, and I highly recommend anyone interested in such a topic to read this one. In a universe where so many people question if something can come about from nothing, where do moral laws arise? From what notion of zero, or 'zero glyph'?
I give Vance Pravat full praise for raising this like he has. Such books do not come along this way, in this intelligent (if I may use the word again like that) manner very often. It raises a lot of questions, which everyone may not agree with. For example, I rarely agreed with the conclusions that Raphael arrived at. Understanding the coming world of super AGIs, he suggests the only 'god' suitable for humanity (out of three choices: tyrannical monster, benevolent meddler , or indifferent) is the last one. He promotes agnosticism. But an agnostic god (staying with the small g god here) would only promote the horrors that humans would fall into. I elect for the engaging savior god, or God. Others may differ on that. But 'gods' are what we have, in super-technology. Should they live with us or rule us?
Pravat also divides duty and obligations of humans into four categories and four sub-categories. He wrongly, I think, describes duty apart from obligation, when they are the same thing. But at least he introduces us again to these arguments. Space does not permit me to go on at length about his argumentative points... all are quite interesting. I will only say that in reality, I do not foresee such an entity being created any time soon, and I would never prescribe person-hood to such a thing. Created machines, no matter how “intelligent”, have no morals; only living humans have those. We had better beware of monsters springing out of our sometimes monstrous desires and souls.
The author says he is not a philosopher, but the philosophy of morals needs no experts, it simply needs our thoughts and reasoning. As a presenter of that, Pravat does extremely well. As a writer of detective fiction, he does less well. Late in the novel, at the phrase “It's time to come clear”, I found the structure of the novel falling apart badly. Without revealing the ending, Pravat commits a grave literary error throughout the remaining 15% of the book by releasing information about himself and the plot which should have been made known all along to the reader. When you, the reader, are placed in the first-person POV of the main character, you should be privy to everything about him, otherwise it is a betrayal to the reader, and we cannot trust the character any further. It is a very sloppy conclusion. But the essential arguments are brilliant to behold. Read this book, and tell others about it.
The real story here is the ongoing debate over highly intelligent agencies and whether or not they should be granted autonomy. While the main drama is told from the first person perspective of Andy, the truly provocative parts are where Andy and others interview Raphael in regularly scheduled interviews, trying to find out his level of development. These are interspersed flashbacks to a corporate boardroom, told in the past tense. And they are the main meat of the arguments about AGI, or artificial general intelligence. In the discussions between Raphael and (especially) Andy, the issues of ethics, morals, and rights surface, and the discussions progress higher and higher each time. Finally, it is noticed that Raphael has better possible arguments for his person-hood that his creator has. In a way, this is a debate by the author through his characters, on the issues. And they are wonderful, thoughtful and insightful discussions.
Should an artificial entity with self-awareness have the same guardian laws as humans? If Raphael can determine right from wrong, should he be given protection in society at large as a free agent? Should he be allowed to stay 'alive' and develop his intelligence? What are the blessings, what are the curses? Such debates are vitally important if we are to accept the creation, by our own hands, of such entities. While offered as a scifi novel, Zeroglyph is in fact a disguised treatise on those morals, ethics and rights for what we would deem to be sentient beings. In this sense, the novel works very well, and I highly recommend anyone interested in such a topic to read this one. In a universe where so many people question if something can come about from nothing, where do moral laws arise? From what notion of zero, or 'zero glyph'?
I give Vance Pravat full praise for raising this like he has. Such books do not come along this way, in this intelligent (if I may use the word again like that) manner very often. It raises a lot of questions, which everyone may not agree with. For example, I rarely agreed with the conclusions that Raphael arrived at. Understanding the coming world of super AGIs, he suggests the only 'god' suitable for humanity (out of three choices: tyrannical monster, benevolent meddler , or indifferent) is the last one. He promotes agnosticism. But an agnostic god (staying with the small g god here) would only promote the horrors that humans would fall into. I elect for the engaging savior god, or God. Others may differ on that. But 'gods' are what we have, in super-technology. Should they live with us or rule us?
Pravat also divides duty and obligations of humans into four categories and four sub-categories. He wrongly, I think, describes duty apart from obligation, when they are the same thing. But at least he introduces us again to these arguments. Space does not permit me to go on at length about his argumentative points... all are quite interesting. I will only say that in reality, I do not foresee such an entity being created any time soon, and I would never prescribe person-hood to such a thing. Created machines, no matter how “intelligent”, have no morals; only living humans have those. We had better beware of monsters springing out of our sometimes monstrous desires and souls.
The author says he is not a philosopher, but the philosophy of morals needs no experts, it simply needs our thoughts and reasoning. As a presenter of that, Pravat does extremely well. As a writer of detective fiction, he does less well. Late in the novel, at the phrase “It's time to come clear”, I found the structure of the novel falling apart badly. Without revealing the ending, Pravat commits a grave literary error throughout the remaining 15% of the book by releasing information about himself and the plot which should have been made known all along to the reader. When you, the reader, are placed in the first-person POV of the main character, you should be privy to everything about him, otherwise it is a betrayal to the reader, and we cannot trust the character any further. It is a very sloppy conclusion. But the essential arguments are brilliant to behold. Read this book, and tell others about it.
January 12, 2022
Probably a 5-/4+, because I found some of the action sequence details with its tech aspect a bit confusing.
It deserves the 5 stars , though, because it is a wonderful book that reminds me of the delight I used to find in writers like Asimov, who gave me great stories interwoven with insights that made me think, in this case philosophical insights into things like morality and free will and individual rights and personhood.
I wish it were available in audio so it could be more accessible.
It deserves the 5 stars , though, because it is a wonderful book that reminds me of the delight I used to find in writers like Asimov, who gave me great stories interwoven with insights that made me think, in this case philosophical insights into things like morality and free will and individual rights and personhood.
I wish it were available in audio so it could be more accessible.
April 17, 2019
Really enjoyed this one, the conversations between Raphael and all the characters were really well thought out and is convincing that this is possibly how this could happen in the future
June 10, 2021
WOW! The effect of this story has on my thinking is hard to describe yet. I don't love this book because it is a historically perfect drama or dreamy sci-fi with incredible characters... I love it because this piece of fiction is our future and it frames it so perfectly. The book unfolds in a way that leaves you guessing until the realization hits you near the end. And then the author spills it all out and explains it. We are building our future and it is amazing. But it will probably be our demise if we are not careful. Seriously, I loved this story!
July 14, 2019
I am a sci-fi nut, with mystery close behind. I love, love, love this story. I did not want it to end, it was so good. Kept me guessing throughout and glued to the pages. I loved the characters too!
I received this book from the author through Authorsxp and am voluntarily giving my honest review.
I received this book from the author through Authorsxp and am voluntarily giving my honest review.
June 25, 2019
I would describe this book as a science fiction mystery rather than a techno-thriller (as described on the cover). Although a portion of the book includes a situation of peril for two of the principal characters, most of the story revolves around determining how, and by whom, the core processor containing the artificial intelligence was stolen from a secure lab. What it really is, however, is a well constructed primer on ethics as applied to AI cast in the form of a story interleaved with passages containing transcripts of discussions on the subject between the AI and its scientist creator or of a court case in which an outside agency sues to free the AI from captivity in the lab, seeking a ruling that the AI enjoys human rights under the law.
I enjoyed the book and recommend it.
I enjoyed the book and recommend it.
June 25, 2019
This is my assessments of this book Zeroglyph by Vance Pravat according to 6 criteria:
1. Too long and Strenuous action - exciting - 4 stars
2. Boring - fun - 5 stars
3. not difficult to read (as for non English native speaker] - 4 stars
4. predictable (common) - good story (unusual) - 5 stars
5. Shalow story - has a deeper meaning - 5 stars
6. The story is mass and Unfinished - The story is clear, understandable and well rounded story - 4 stars
Total 4.5 stars.
1. Too long and Strenuous action - exciting - 4 stars
2. Boring - fun - 5 stars
3. not difficult to read (as for non English native speaker] - 4 stars
4. predictable (common) - good story (unusual) - 5 stars
5. Shalow story - has a deeper meaning - 5 stars
6. The story is mass and Unfinished - The story is clear, understandable and well rounded story - 4 stars
Total 4.5 stars.
February 10, 2020
A novel textbook, or a textbook novel?
For the story alone I would have given this a 4* . As an essay on ethics and non-human ethics (which to me is an oxymoron), I would have given it a 4*. As both in one, it’s at best a 3. A melange of class lecture and fable.
Unfair, because I fundamentally disagree on the concept that programmed electronics can achieve consciousness, which I openly admit I believe is only the domain of the soul, Atman, or whatever animates Life (that thing that leaves upon death). That a high form of thinkingness, computingness, calculation might be achieved I do not disavow.
The story was fascinating. The intruding lectures on ethics etc. will be welcome only to the academic. Woe to us all if ever academic ‘ethicists’ should be our judges or jury. God if he, she or it exists is for certain not to be contained in an academic classroom. And Love, may all poets be blessed, needs no AI defender.
I didn’t quit. I read the whole thing although it was a challenge.
I would recommend the book for the serious reader. I don’t think the author is interested in the casual reader. And good for him.
Clark Carr
For the story alone I would have given this a 4* . As an essay on ethics and non-human ethics (which to me is an oxymoron), I would have given it a 4*. As both in one, it’s at best a 3. A melange of class lecture and fable.
Unfair, because I fundamentally disagree on the concept that programmed electronics can achieve consciousness, which I openly admit I believe is only the domain of the soul, Atman, or whatever animates Life (that thing that leaves upon death). That a high form of thinkingness, computingness, calculation might be achieved I do not disavow.
The story was fascinating. The intruding lectures on ethics etc. will be welcome only to the academic. Woe to us all if ever academic ‘ethicists’ should be our judges or jury. God if he, she or it exists is for certain not to be contained in an academic classroom. And Love, may all poets be blessed, needs no AI defender.
I didn’t quit. I read the whole thing although it was a challenge.
I would recommend the book for the serious reader. I don’t think the author is interested in the casual reader. And good for him.
Clark Carr
February 18, 2020
This is certainly an interesting exploration of the emergence of an Artificial General Intelligence (AGI). I found the story and the thinking behind it to be well thought out. We do not have any AGIs at the moment and this story explores the likely consequences of what could happen when one does arise, if it does. I don't know if it is likely, but I think we might well want to be prepared as it could happen in the near future. You can read it and see what you think. Or maybe you are an AGI reading this, and laughing at us.
July 24, 2020
Ethics Theory
This is an interesting story with different levels. First it is a mystery of something lost or stolen. It is also the opposite of the story of Frankenstein in that the creator cared for his creation father than hate it. Between scenes are transcripts testing an artificial intelligence in regards to morality. It is a good read to think more about the impact of a possible artificial intelligence, similar to stories like The Adolescence of P1, The Moon is a Harsh Mistress, When Harley was one as well as 2001 a Space Oddyssy.
This is an interesting story with different levels. First it is a mystery of something lost or stolen. It is also the opposite of the story of Frankenstein in that the creator cared for his creation father than hate it. Between scenes are transcripts testing an artificial intelligence in regards to morality. It is a good read to think more about the impact of a possible artificial intelligence, similar to stories like The Adolescence of P1, The Moon is a Harsh Mistress, When Harley was one as well as 2001 a Space Oddyssy.
January 29, 2020
Johnboy
An in-depth book on the social and moral functioning of a true artificial intelligence. Even as deep and psychological and technical as this book was it still kept me turning pages. Maybe because A I. Is one of my syfy passions. It is truly my belief that that a true life inteligence would quickly figure out the one species on the planet that contributes nothing and destroys every thing it touches......
An in-depth book on the social and moral functioning of a true artificial intelligence. Even as deep and psychological and technical as this book was it still kept me turning pages. Maybe because A I. Is one of my syfy passions. It is truly my belief that that a true life inteligence would quickly figure out the one species on the planet that contributes nothing and destroys every thing it touches......
February 28, 2020
More of a philosophy book than a novel
If I had wanted to read a philosophy book debating at length the ethical dilemmas that could arise while creating AIs, I would have bought that kind of book. But I had been looking for a much lighter sci-fi read on possible futures, so I was quite disappointed with this book. The plot without the extensive forays into philosophy was well done. Just be wary of what you are really buying when you purchase this book.
If I had wanted to read a philosophy book debating at length the ethical dilemmas that could arise while creating AIs, I would have bought that kind of book. But I had been looking for a much lighter sci-fi read on possible futures, so I was quite disappointed with this book. The plot without the extensive forays into philosophy was well done. Just be wary of what you are really buying when you purchase this book.
February 6, 2020
Maybe just 3 1/2
Depending upon what you expect out of this book, you may love it or find it preachy. It is a very good treatise on AI morality conundrums - well researched. Parts of it are nail-biting, and parts may cause your eyes to glaze over. Not just a crime drama, unless you skip the sections that the author permits you to.
Depending upon what you expect out of this book, you may love it or find it preachy. It is a very good treatise on AI morality conundrums - well researched. Parts of it are nail-biting, and parts may cause your eyes to glaze over. Not just a crime drama, unless you skip the sections that the author permits you to.
April 18, 2020
A bit mixed
This is worth a read if just for the questions addressed. The origins of machine sentience and the logical foundations of morality. It is overly polemical however and too overtly an elementary treatise on philosophy of mind 101 and ethics 101 with a bit of a plot in the background to justify the discussion. It contains a bibliography of philosophical references for Pete’s sake. The long winding story picks up a bit at the end when you find out what it was really about. Though I have to say the big twist was a bit contrived and a little annoying. But there’s still some good stuff in there and some great lines. The philosophical question is by no means resolved - which was hardly very likely. But I was always very interested in how it would turn out for Raphael. There wasn’t enough of that. I wanted more.
This is worth a read if just for the questions addressed. The origins of machine sentience and the logical foundations of morality. It is overly polemical however and too overtly an elementary treatise on philosophy of mind 101 and ethics 101 with a bit of a plot in the background to justify the discussion. It contains a bibliography of philosophical references for Pete’s sake. The long winding story picks up a bit at the end when you find out what it was really about. Though I have to say the big twist was a bit contrived and a little annoying. But there’s still some good stuff in there and some great lines. The philosophical question is by no means resolved - which was hardly very likely. But I was always very interested in how it would turn out for Raphael. There wasn’t enough of that. I wanted more.
July 11, 2019
10-07-2019
I just finished reading it. Being from computing science background. I enjoyed it immensely. specially marveled the way you narrative is used to delve in AI concept. In particular the Turing Test. I am going to ask my student s who are interested in [pursuing the AI machine learning NLP, cognitive intelligence. the climax was the real surprise. I don't think anyone reading it will be able to guess it. the book deserves a 5stars without any hesitation. .Many congratulations to Vance for this book.the whole time I have been thinking that the author must be a gifted AI engineer. To write all those sessions between Raph and Andy.
I just finished reading it. Being from computing science background. I enjoyed it immensely. specially marveled the way you narrative is used to delve in AI concept. In particular the Turing Test. I am going to ask my student s who are interested in [pursuing the AI machine learning NLP, cognitive intelligence. the climax was the real surprise. I don't think anyone reading it will be able to guess it. the book deserves a 5stars without any hesitation. .Many congratulations to Vance for this book.the whole time I have been thinking that the author must be a gifted AI engineer. To write all those sessions between Raph and Andy.
January 22, 2020
Sure the basic premise of the story is science fiction-like, the idea of an AI achieving sentience is cool and I like it,but the whole thing felt more like a mystery/hostage-type story with a bunch of philosophical reasoning thrown in (God save me from the Interlude). There was also a WHOLE bunch of explaining going in a very dialogue heavy manner. Around two-thirds of the way through (64% on the Kindle) the line "Show, don't tell, Andy." appeared, and I couldn't help but nod at this advice. Having said that, the author clearly is smart, well-read with a cool imagination, and I reckon he's going to write some great stuff in the future. I look forward to his next publication.
August 28, 2022
Wow, 5 stars for Jerry in Chicago. Where to begin?
For starters this was a thoughtful and skillfully created story. As a consumer of a lot of AI related Sci-Fi I can say this is way above the rest. Dare I say, a real piece of literature.
Embedded in the narrative are these transcripts between the AI and its creator where ethical, moral and other such softer sides of humanities are discussed. This was very thought provoking and took me back to my college days and Humanities classes. It was very interesting to see how all these schools of philosophy were discussed with our AI friend.
The plot was fast paced and a crazy good read.
Thanks Vance.
For starters this was a thoughtful and skillfully created story. As a consumer of a lot of AI related Sci-Fi I can say this is way above the rest. Dare I say, a real piece of literature.
Embedded in the narrative are these transcripts between the AI and its creator where ethical, moral and other such softer sides of humanities are discussed. This was very thought provoking and took me back to my college days and Humanities classes. It was very interesting to see how all these schools of philosophy were discussed with our AI friend.
The plot was fast paced and a crazy good read.
Thanks Vance.
February 23, 2023
We have already entered the age of AI (ChatGPT and others) and maybe even Artificial General Intelligence. However, after spending 6 years in the Navy in the crypto field, I doubt that we will know about the reality of an AGI until long after it exists.
This book brings out some thoughtful topics to consider especially those in relation to morality and values. All we have to do is take a look at ChatGPT and we already see companies rejecting it because of the obvious biases programmed.
This book brings out some thoughtful topics to consider especially those in relation to morality and values. All we have to do is take a look at ChatGPT and we already see companies rejecting it because of the obvious biases programmed.
June 19, 2020
Thought Provoking Story
Some very challenging topics covered here that are explored in a very entertaining and stimulating manner. What is real A.I.? Should A.I. Beings have rights like people? The film, ‘Bicentennial Man’ touched on this in somewhat of a superficial way and ‘Ex Machina’ took it much further. This book really has us ponder the important questions as we make our way closer to real A.I. beings. A great read!
Some very challenging topics covered here that are explored in a very entertaining and stimulating manner. What is real A.I.? Should A.I. Beings have rights like people? The film, ‘Bicentennial Man’ touched on this in somewhat of a superficial way and ‘Ex Machina’ took it much further. This book really has us ponder the important questions as we make our way closer to real A.I. beings. A great read!
June 26, 2020
Well that's interesting
Learned a lot about behavior theory and the thought experiments of the great thinkers. Most I had some familiarity with. Why and how would require a theory of its own. So overall the book was interesting. The A.I. aspect makes it science fiction. The thriller is a stretch. Overall The story and characters are okay formulaish but okay. Read the bits of transcript. That's where it gets interesting.
Learned a lot about behavior theory and the thought experiments of the great thinkers. Most I had some familiarity with. Why and how would require a theory of its own. So overall the book was interesting. The A.I. aspect makes it science fiction. The thriller is a stretch. Overall The story and characters are okay formulaish but okay. Read the bits of transcript. That's where it gets interesting.
October 15, 2021
AI mystery, excellent read
This is an insightful and intelligent look at humanity and AI.
It’s a well done story, thoughtful and entertaining.
Read this if you enjoy sci fi, near future dystopian or utopian books, crime thrillers, or psychological thrillers. It is not densely packed with unnecessary activity, and is also never boring. I will be keeping an eye on this author waiting for future work.
This is an insightful and intelligent look at humanity and AI.
It’s a well done story, thoughtful and entertaining.
Read this if you enjoy sci fi, near future dystopian or utopian books, crime thrillers, or psychological thrillers. It is not densely packed with unnecessary activity, and is also never boring. I will be keeping an eye on this author waiting for future work.
February 7, 2020
A wickedly thoughtful first novel
This isn’t a great action adventure, nor brain candy sci fi. Instead, it’s a terrific story that delves into moral philosophy with some very thoughtful, and perhaps even novel solutions, at the same time providing some quite thrilling scenes. This would make an outstanding movie. Asimov would have loved where this AI adventure goes.
This isn’t a great action adventure, nor brain candy sci fi. Instead, it’s a terrific story that delves into moral philosophy with some very thoughtful, and perhaps even novel solutions, at the same time providing some quite thrilling scenes. This would make an outstanding movie. Asimov would have loved where this AI adventure goes.
Displaying 1 - 30 of 69 reviews