This book is in need of a good, thorough editor.
Example One: When discussing errors in thinking due to stereotypes, the author writes: "They speed up our response time and allow us to survive when time isn't on our side, letting us perform a more careful and thoughtful analysis." Presumably, the author meant "...when time isn't on our side, preventing us from performing a more careful and thoughtful analysis." This is a small point, but these types of errors are strewn throughout the first two chapters, to such extent that the book becomes unnecessarily confusing and muddled.
Example Two: The author provides a syllogism for the reader to consider: "Colorful snakes are venomous. A King Snake is colorful. A King Snake is venomous." He follows up by stating that "You may have inferred that I meant all colorful snakes are not venomous, bit it was not stated so a common sense approach would be to read the first assumption as "Many colorful snakes are venomous." First of all, I presume he meant to say "...all colorful snakes are venomous." not that they aren't, another example of the author's sloppiness. Secondly, the author apparently isn't familiar with the concept of a simple declarative sentence, such a "Horses are animals." or "Cars are vehicles." Would it be a common sense approach to assume I mean "Many horses are animals" or that "Many cars are vehicles"? These constant mistakes from an author attempting to teach critical thinking serve to discredit his entire book. I will not be finishing this book, and I regret wasting my time and money on it. I do not recommend.