Once Australia's premiere sports snarkologist (I say that as a compliment), Titus O'Reily has, for reasons not entirely clear, moved into the realm of Serious Journalism with a book that does a few strange and disparate things.
Let's look at the positives first.
The basic thrust of this book is that Australians will forgive just about anything if the star is big enough and the sporting success strong enough. It's a great point and Titus draws on many cases, old and new, to show his point. The footnotes are the primary source of the humour that readers of his website/Twitter followers will be familiar with. The old stories are particularly interesting, such as about Frederick Standish. I particularly liked his look at 'white knight' Cashed-Up Businessmen who come in to save the day and ruin everything. This is not a bad book by any means.
But.
The negatives.
I'm not sure why Titus has appointed himself to the ever-growing board of Australia's moral police. Self-righteousness doesn't look great on anybody, but particularly somebody whose great gift to the sports-loving public has been his ability to skewer an ego with a tweet or comedically use self-deprecation to its finest advantage. Titus has always done these well, but in A Sporting Chance he hops on his high horse for a few hundred pages, espousing a particular kind of morality that is pitched as largely objective, or worst-case scenario against the 'inner boys club' at the heart of contemporary sports. He's not exactly wrong, but the problem is he's not exactly right.
Part of his larger premise is this: don't forgive people.
It's never spelled out that simply, but basically Titus' theory is that in some other jobs you'd get fired for bad character decisions; why not sports? I'd dispute the validity of the argument, but even if it is the case, the criminal justice system is living proof that rehabilitation and community forgiveness are absolute necessities in helping people actually change.
Should that stop the likes of Eddie McGuire get sanctioned and critiqued? Absolutely not.
But the idea that perhaps guys who fall from grace get hit harder and harder with less forgiveness? It's a truly toxic response to an issue of toxicity.
The other key problem is Titus has moved into the difficult place of mainstream journalists protecting mainstream journalists. The one group that never seems to attract criticism in A Sporting Chance is, of course, journalists. Not commentators - the likes of Channel 9 cricket's coverage gets thoroughly roasted, with some cause - but journalists.
I've edited this up from a 2 star to a 3 star - because despite my many issues with it, it's still a well-written, engaging read.
This isn't a 'don't read' - but it will likely be a disappointing read if you're hoping for Titus' comedy, rather than Titus' moralism on contemporary sports.