Fat. Such a little word evokes big responses. While "fat" describes the size and shape of bodies—their appearance—our negative reactions to corpulence also depend on something tangible and tactile. As this book argues, there is more to fat than meets the eye. A Cultural History of the Stuff of Life offers reflections on how fat has been perceived and imagined in the West since antiquity. Featuring fascinating historical accounts as well as philosophical, religious, and cultural analyses—including discussions of status, gender, and race—the book digs deep into the past for the roots of our current notions and prejudices. Two central themes how we have perceived and imagined corpulent bodies over the centuries, and how fat—as a substance as well as a description of body size—has been associated with vitality and fertility as well as perceptions of animality. By exploring the complex ways in which fat, fatness, and fattening have been perceived over time, this book provides rich insights into the stuff our stereotypes are made of.
Forth's book is a pleasant, Foucault -style, history of fatness in western discourse, allegedly with a materialist, embodied twist. The book does the genealogy work in a nice and compelling way, reconstructing how fat underwent mutable fortunes and lines of continuity from Graeco-Roman antiquity through mediaeval Europe, the Renaissance and modernity. There's also a juicy section on the fabrication of fat bourgeois scare vis-à-vis the emergent colonial imaginaries and racial theories, a section I wished was only longer, deeper and with more positive instances of non-western viewpoints. As for materiality - the impact of fat as such on the senses and dispositions of human perception - instead, the book falls short of the (noble) endeavour, after a promising introduction. After learning of the lifegiving properties and divinatory and alchemical usages of fat, this sub-plot gets lost through the chapters as discourse takes over. Anyhow, an enjoyable and insightful read.
La gordura siempre ha provocado sensaciones encontradas: si para aquellos que no escribieron nuestra historia se trataba – en diversos contextos – de algo virtuoso; para los que habitaban nuestros (hoy llamados) países era algo obsceno. En estos, no pocos llegaron a imaginar futuros utópicos en los que se sugería expulsar de las ciudades a ciudadanos considerados como gordos.
Si creíamos que estas ideas eugenésicas eran propias del Siglo XX (achacables a ciertos movimientos sociopolíticos), este texto nos muestra como desde el – siempre evocado y admirado –Renacimiento existían aquellos que, desde posiciones no poco relevantes, soñaron con países libres de aquella degeneración del cuerpo que, bajo su prisma, era la gordura.
En este ensayo Cristopher E. Forth hace un recorrido por nuestra historia (la que se toma como relevante en los discursos, la meramente Occidental) para tratar de entender cómo y dónde comenzó esta animadversión hacia los cuerpos grasos.
Un recorrido que, además de oponerse a los mitos y creencias que ciertas figuras como las Tres Gracias de Rubens han alimentado, también sirve para preguntarnos muchas cosas; como, por ejemplo: ¿Cuál sería nuestra visión actual de los cuerpos humanos si no hubiésemos sentido asco por gran parte de ellos durante toda nuestra historia? O, ¿cómo sería nuestra cultura del fitness si la visión no Occidental hubiese sido la predominante?
"Heavy" on history, this is a dense read exploring the moral evolution and devolution of fat, from Graeco-Roman times to the present. It discusses how fat has always been both a metaphor for plenty and an insult to the larger than average.