What do you think?
Rate this book
Liberal Nationalism
"This is a most timely, intelligent, well-written, and absorbing essay on a central and painful social and political problem of our time."―Isaiah Berlin
"The major achievement of this remarkable book is a critical theory of nationalism, worked through historical and contemporary examples, explaining the value of national commitments and defining their moral limits. Tamir explores a set of problems that philosophers have been notably reluctant to take on, and leaves us all in her debt."―Michael Walzer
In this provocative work, Yael Tamir urges liberals not to surrender the concept of nationalism to conservative, chauvinist, or racist ideologies. In her view, liberalism, with its respect for personal autonomy, reflection, and choice, and nationalism, with its emphasis on belonging, loyalty, and solidarity, are not irreconcilable. Here she offers a new theory, "liberal nationalism," which allows each set of values to accommodate the other. Tamir sees nationalism as an affirmation of communal and cultural memberships and as a quest for recognition and self-respect. Persuasively she argues that national groups can enjoy these benefits through political arrangements other than the nation-state. While acknowledging that nationalism places members of national minorities at a disadvantage, Tamir offers guidelines for alleviating the problems involved, using examples from currents conflicts in the Middle East and Eastern Europe.
Liberal Nationalism is an impressive attempt to tie together a wide range of issues often kept personal autonomy, cultural membership, political obligations, particularity versus impartiality in moral duties, and global justice. Drawing on material from disparate fields―including political philosophy, ethics, law, and sociology―Tamir brings out important and previously unnoticed interconnections between them, offering a new perspective on the influence of nationalism on modern political philosophy.
"The major achievement of this remarkable book is a critical theory of nationalism, worked through historical and contemporary examples, explaining the value of national commitments and defining their moral limits. Tamir explores a set of problems that philosophers have been notably reluctant to take on, and leaves us all in her debt."―Michael Walzer
In this provocative work, Yael Tamir urges liberals not to surrender the concept of nationalism to conservative, chauvinist, or racist ideologies. In her view, liberalism, with its respect for personal autonomy, reflection, and choice, and nationalism, with its emphasis on belonging, loyalty, and solidarity, are not irreconcilable. Here she offers a new theory, "liberal nationalism," which allows each set of values to accommodate the other. Tamir sees nationalism as an affirmation of communal and cultural memberships and as a quest for recognition and self-respect. Persuasively she argues that national groups can enjoy these benefits through political arrangements other than the nation-state. While acknowledging that nationalism places members of national minorities at a disadvantage, Tamir offers guidelines for alleviating the problems involved, using examples from currents conflicts in the Middle East and Eastern Europe.
Liberal Nationalism is an impressive attempt to tie together a wide range of issues often kept personal autonomy, cultural membership, political obligations, particularity versus impartiality in moral duties, and global justice. Drawing on material from disparate fields―including political philosophy, ethics, law, and sociology―Tamir brings out important and previously unnoticed interconnections between them, offering a new perspective on the influence of nationalism on modern political philosophy.
206 pages, Paperback
First published April 28, 1993
7 people are currently reading
122 people want to read
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 3 of 3 reviews
March 6, 2018
I really enjoyed this book. I felt like she dealt with a lot of the issues that I've wondered about regarding liberalism. The last chapter was idealistic, but also felt like what I have been looking for--an alternative vision, outside of the current nation-state ideal.
July 16, 2025
Yael Tamir’s Liberal Nationalism is the rare political philosophy book that dares to navigate the treacherous terrain between two ideological giants: liberalism and nationalism, without capitulating to the excesses of either. Rather than accepting the conventional wisdom that nationalism is the domain of chauvinists or racists, Tamir reclaims the concept for those who value autonomy, rights, and pluralism.
Tamir argues that individuals are not atomized beings who choose their values in a vacuum, but “contextual individuals,” shaped by culture, yet capable of reflective choice. A recurring tension in the book, between communal belonging and personal freedom, is not dismissed but embraced as the defining condition of human life. Liberal nationalism, then, emerges as a moral middle ground: one that respects the importance of national identity while insisting on individual rights and self-authorship.
The book shines when it critiques both liberalism’s tendency to underestimate the importance of communal life and nationalism’s frequent descent into exclusivity. Tamir’s nuanced discussion of identity, framing national affiliation not as fate but as a constitutive and sometimes elective part of one’s moral life, was a highlight for me. Her breakdown of identity models, the right to culture, and the distinction between self-rule and self-determination are brilliant theoretical contributions that avoid idealism without falling into cultural determinism.
Importantly, Tamir doesn’t shy away from political implications. She addresses immigration, welfare, multiculturalism, and the ethics of statehood through the lens of her liberal nationalist theory, calling on wealthier nations to fulfill their global obligations if they wish to preserve cultural homogeneity. She even offers an answer to the cosmopolitan idealists: a universal culture without rootedness isn’t utopian, it’s hollow.
Tamir argues that individuals are not atomized beings who choose their values in a vacuum, but “contextual individuals,” shaped by culture, yet capable of reflective choice. A recurring tension in the book, between communal belonging and personal freedom, is not dismissed but embraced as the defining condition of human life. Liberal nationalism, then, emerges as a moral middle ground: one that respects the importance of national identity while insisting on individual rights and self-authorship.
The book shines when it critiques both liberalism’s tendency to underestimate the importance of communal life and nationalism’s frequent descent into exclusivity. Tamir’s nuanced discussion of identity, framing national affiliation not as fate but as a constitutive and sometimes elective part of one’s moral life, was a highlight for me. Her breakdown of identity models, the right to culture, and the distinction between self-rule and self-determination are brilliant theoretical contributions that avoid idealism without falling into cultural determinism.
Importantly, Tamir doesn’t shy away from political implications. She addresses immigration, welfare, multiculturalism, and the ethics of statehood through the lens of her liberal nationalist theory, calling on wealthier nations to fulfill their global obligations if they wish to preserve cultural homogeneity. She even offers an answer to the cosmopolitan idealists: a universal culture without rootedness isn’t utopian, it’s hollow.
This entire review has been hidden because of spoilers.
October 13, 2012
Wow! What a wonderful book! This book makes one proud to be a liberal!
Although it has weaknesses, such as adopting a too laissez-faire attitude over bureaucratic rationalism, it contains a strong antidote to Socialism and economic anarchism.
Although it has weaknesses, such as adopting a too laissez-faire attitude over bureaucratic rationalism, it contains a strong antidote to Socialism and economic anarchism.
Displaying 1 - 3 of 3 reviews