"Coventry" is a science fiction short story by American writer Robert A. Heinlein, part of his Future History series. It was first published in the July 1940 issue of Astounding Science-Fiction and later collected into the book Revolt in 2100 in 1953. The title is inspired by the British idiom "to send someone to Coventry". In 2017, the story won the Prometheus Hall of Fame award.
Robert Anson Heinlein was an American science fiction author, aeronautical engineer, and naval officer. Sometimes called the "dean of science fiction writers", he was among the first to emphasize scientific accuracy in his fiction, and was thus a pioneer of the subgenre of hard science fiction. His published works, both fiction and non-fiction, express admiration for competence and emphasize the value of critical thinking. His plots often posed provocative situations which challenged conventional social mores. His work continues to have an influence on the science-fiction genre, and on modern culture more generally. Heinlein became one of the first American science-fiction writers to break into mainstream magazines such as The Saturday Evening Post in the late 1940s. He was one of the best-selling science-fiction novelists for many decades, and he, Isaac Asimov, and Arthur C. Clarke are often considered the "Big Three" of English-language science fiction authors. Notable Heinlein works include Stranger in a Strange Land, Starship Troopers (which helped mold the space marine and mecha archetypes) and The Moon Is a Harsh Mistress. His work sometimes had controversial aspects, such as plural marriage in The Moon Is a Harsh Mistress, militarism in Starship Troopers and technologically competent women characters who were formidable, yet often stereotypically feminine—such as Friday. Heinlein used his science fiction as a way to explore provocative social and political ideas and to speculate how progress in science and engineering might shape the future of politics, race, religion, and sex. Within the framework of his science-fiction stories, Heinlein repeatedly addressed certain social themes: the importance of individual liberty and self-reliance, the nature of sexual relationships, the obligation individuals owe to their societies, the influence of organized religion on culture and government, and the tendency of society to repress nonconformist thought. He also speculated on the influence of space travel on human cultural practices. Heinlein was named the first Science Fiction Writers Grand Master in 1974. Four of his novels won Hugo Awards. In addition, fifty years after publication, seven of his works were awarded "Retro Hugos"—awards given retrospectively for works that were published before the Hugo Awards came into existence. In his fiction, Heinlein coined terms that have become part of the English language, including grok, waldo and speculative fiction, as well as popularizing existing terms like "TANSTAAFL", "pay it forward", and "space marine". He also anticipated mechanical computer-aided design with "Drafting Dan" and described a modern version of a waterbed in his novel Beyond This Horizon. Also wrote under Pen names: Anson McDonald, Lyle Monroe, Caleb Saunders, John Riverside and Simon York.
19/ Coventry (1940) Periodo en el que está basada: 2090 David Mackinnon se halla ante un tribunal por ser acusado, según el convenio nuevo de EEUU, de dañar a un hombre libre. Tiene dos elecciones, entre las cuales puede elegir: la modificación de su conducta o el destierro a Conventry, un lugar enorme y fronterizo, lleno de personas de dudosa y anti cívico comportamiento y violenta conducta. Una vez pasada la frontera, será detenido y acusado, de manera desproporcionada en uno de los tres jefaturas soberanas de Conventry. En la cárcel, Dave conocerá a Maggie, que le ayudará a sobrevivir y fugarse de la cárcel, además de hacerse partícipe de una asociación privada de rebeldes contra los tres estados...pero alguna cosa más le depara a Mackinnon y él mismo ni se lo imagina...
Nos situamos en un gobierno en US con un Convenio escrito por uno de los líderes de la anterior revolución, Novak ( jefe de John Lyle en ‘ Si esto continúa’) para asegurar la máxima libertad a todos, excepto si se daña a otra persona. Entonces el ejecutor de dicha conducta es llevado a los tribunales, que no le juzgan y sentencian, sino que le dan a elegir si deciden re insertarse en la sociedad, tras un periodo de terapia social, o ir desterrado a Conventry, con personas que tienen las mismas actitudes y pensamientos. De hecho se nos presenta una sociedad en la cual está ya prohibido y erradicado matar, incluso por deporte a los animales, de ahí que esté establecida la creación económica de proteínas. Ya nadie pasa hambre y se ha controlado el clima, para que no sea extremo.
En Conventry hay tres jefaturas soberanas, creadas por los desterrados: 1/ Nueva américa: aparentemente ‘democrático’ pero que es el que se apodera de los pocos bienes de Lyle y lo encarcela. 2/ Estado libre: una didactura sin tapujos (basada en las antiguas leyes del funcionalismo: ‘ Las carreteras deben rodar’, historia del futuro I) 3/ Los ángeles: con los aún escasos seguidores del antiguo Profeta encarnado ( ‘ Si esto continúa’), que viven en un monte realizando plegarias día y noche. Los tres mini gobiernos pretenden gobernar el resto del continente, para el 1º es un medio propagandístico, para el 2º una política fija (golpe de estado y guerra), mientras que el tercero espera el regreso del primer profeta encarnado( religión, dogmas y fanatismos). Con éste resumen, EL AUTOR CRITICA TODAS LAS FORMAS DE GOBIERNO ESTABLECIDAS EN LA HISTORIA. Inevitablemente, las dos primeras soberanías pactan para apoderarse de los EEUU y su nuevo e idealizado gobierno social....la cual cosa no puede suceder nuevamente, después de la terrible época de tiranía pasada.
LA HISTORIA QUIERE LLEVARNOS A QUE CUESTIONEMOS SI ES NECESAREO UN MUNDO PERFECTO O NO ( QUIZÁ EN PARTE), QUE NOS DESPOJA DE LA SORPRESA DEL VIVIR, ACERCA DE LOS LIMITES DE LIBERTAD Y DEL DESPOJO DE LA INDIVIDUALIDAD DEL CARÁCTER DEL SER HUMANO FRENTE AL BIEN COMÚN. ES LA INEVITABLE LACRA DEL COMPORTAMIENTO HUMANO, MUCHAS VECES IMPERFECTO, PERO OTRAS TANTAS VECES, RICO Y GENEROSO..NO TODO NI TODOS PUEDEN CONTROLARSE Y MEJORARSE. HEINLEIN NO DEJA DE CRITICAR EL ESTABLECIMIENTO DE LAS DESDEÑABLES FORMAS DE MANIPULACIÓN Y OPRESIÓN DE LAS PRINCIPALES FORMAS DE GOBIERNO EN LA HISTORIA, QUE NO DEJAN DE REPETIRSE UNA Y OTRA VEZ. POR TODO ELLO, ES UN RELATO CRITICO DE CARGADO FONDO PSICOLÓGICO- SOCIAL DE CAUSA Y EFECTO GENERACIONAL ( la causa que lleva a Dave a golpear a un tipo y ser llevado a los tribunales, es debido a su carácter que juzga la moral de los demás y ejecutar una forma de castigo adecuada; estigma una infancia con un padre autoritario e implacable), ACERCA DE LA INEVITABLE Y MAL LLEVADA AUTORIDAD DE LOS GOBIERNOS Y HOGARES, POR EXCESO O CARENCIA
Avances y/ o predicciones Tecnológicas: - Vuelta al viaje interplanetario - Control del clima Avances y / o predicciones sociales: - establecimiento del ‘Convenio’ ( documento social – científico) ,posterior a la revolución y derroque del gobierno del profeta, que asegura la máxima libertad del individuo, siempre y cuando no se haga daño a otra persona. - Perfeccionamiento de la ciencia de las relaciones sociales, basada en las afirmaciones negativas básicas de la Semántica - Fabricación de proteínas económicas (alimentos sintéticos) y ruina del negocio de criar carne para su matanza.
Honestly, this short story is truly one of my favorites of all time, ever. I need to re-read it again (but I've read it threes times since the first time in seventh grade). It is the perfect counterpoint to Ayn Rand's works and while no more philosophically correct, I love it for the anarchy of those on the other side of the barrier, for the choice of "learning the hard way" or reprogramming.
A short story. David MacKinnon, a romantic idealist, is convicted of assault in a society where a person’s action enjuries another individual is a crime. The government fears the individualist MacKinnon will repeat his action, he is given a choice: to be mentally fixed by psychologists, or go toan area known as Coventry, a rugged outland area beyond the Barrier, where people who refuse to abide by social norms are exiled. He chooses exile and discovers it isn’t the “paradise” he was expecting.
David McKinnon is a social outcast, deemed too violent to coexist in a world in which social engineering has been mastered by science and The Covenant serves as the framework for a civil society. When David refuses mental reconditioning, he is jettisoned by his own choice out of the United States, across the “Barrier” into the wild and woolly land know as Coventry.
What starts as an intriguing foray into a spontaneously organized anarchy becomes a disappointing polemic for scientifically based social engineering. Heinlein’s deliberately naive characterizations and attempts to establish a "free" society through science kept me from empathizing with the people or ideas. As always though, he deserves credit for boldness of thought.
Read from a pdf facsimile of Astounding v25n05, July 1940. P. 50-93
Un poco de trama, corridas de acá para allá y muchas explicaciones, incluso nos encontramos con todo un fragmento compuesto de varios párrafos metido entremedio de la historia para explicar un tema que se menciona en la historia (para entenderlo o justificarlo, como si fuera una nota al pie pero de una extensión gigantesca). Algo muy raro en esta historia es que Heinlein nos repite, una vez al principio y otra a mitad de camino, lo que les sucede a los habitantes que infringen la ley, estos son "reacondicionados" para dejar de ser peligrosos para la sociedad o de negarse al tratamiento, estos son enviados a Coventry. ¿Para qué repetir esto si queda clarísimo desde un principio? es lo que da el puntapié a la historia, no encuentro explicación a esta repetición, ya que no agrega ni plantea nada nuevo o diferente. El final del cuento mejora un poquito, pero en general es malo.
The story starts with a man on trial. This section of the story had a very hollywood feel. Especially when the main character made an epic speech. But the judge out did him and agreed to send him away instead of having his head re-programed. I agree I would want my head re-programed but i'm happy to have it done to criminals. I enjoyed this story and found it interesting. They have a humane way of treat criminals. But it's not perfect. I also loved watching the main character change to a better person. Well almost better person. Humans aren't perfect.
I am giving this 5 stars, because the book was written in 1940. It is a beautiful ring-composition of a story involving a fractured United States. But, as I have been reading these stories #1 through #21, I finally started getting burned out on this 1,000-page Space Opera.
These three stories "If this goes on", "Coventry", and "Misfit" can all be found in the book "Revolt in 2100".
A story that examines society. It was okay, but I thought it was going a different way. Anyway, it is really about self discovery and one's place in society.