An overlooked slice of history (on the American side) gets examined by a noted military historian, John Eisenhower, who was Dwight Eisenhower's son. I was pleasantly surprised by how smooth and engaging the narrative was. Given Eisenhower's immersion in military culture virtually from birth, I was expecting a much stiffer, clunkier writing style, with an emphasis on military tactics. Not at all. This is finely written history, with an emphasis on personalities, localities, and the overarching political context of the times.
Taking place on the eve of WWI, this topic is seldom written about by American historians. WWI overshadows these events, with it paling in comparison to what was going on in Europe at that time. Biographies of Woodrow Wilson, while not ignoring Wilson's attempts at intervention in Mexican affairs, do not focus heavily on that part of Wilson's presidency. One of the reasons for this might be that, yes when compared to WWI, it is definitely a much less historically significant event. But I also think it is because Wilson (while a secondary character in this book) does not come off looking well here (not that many people do here). Wilson violated the sovereignty of another nation, and at first did not have a solid pretext for doing so. Even when one existed later, after Pancho Villa's raid on Columbus, NM, it was still not done very smoothly.
But the focus here is on Mexico and its bloody, convoluted revolution. So many people are involved, many of them end up dead in a hail of bullets, that sometimes it is hard to keep track of everyone, especially at the beginning. Later, the narrative settles down a bit as Eisenhower focuses on Villa, Alvaro Obregon, and Venustiano Carranza on the Mexican side. There were multiple warring factions, each with their own grievances and ways of inciting terror. Power changes hands several times, and rarely ends without bloodshed.
Once General John J. Pershing takes command of the Punitive Expedition, the book follows a more structured pattern - reviewing U.S. troop movements and describing their encounters with troops loyal to the Mexican government or to Villa. Eisenhower uses his military knowledge to help the reader understand how the U.S. troops placed themselves in dangerous situations. The battles themselves were few and far between, but Eisenhower does not bog down when describing them.
This is a welcome read on a forgotten part of history (outside of Mexico). Also, in an appendix, Eisenhower writes of going to visit several of the locales and how some of them are still recognizable and some are not (this was in the early 1990s). It was a nice, personal way to end a good book.