Not the worst book I've ever read, but it was also more confusing than satisfying.
The good:
The book was professionally edited and well put-together - thank you! This is an author who cares about their book. It gets a full extra star just for this.
While I agree with the others that the protagonist is vague in many ways, I thought he was complete and well developed from an emotional standpoint. That is, I found his reactions authentic and distinct from other characters. I also really liked some of the minor characters, in particular the old lady (Agnes?) at the community center.
The setting couldn't be more pleasant. I moved away from Oregon twenty years ago, but the descriptions of the woods and sea brought back nice memories.
The bad:
I found the entire premise, the main plot and all the subplots, to be entirely unbelievable. I won't give any spoilers away, but - for example - I just couldn't believe that the young and incredibly beautiful journalist who just moved to town is so overwhelmingly attracted to the old, self-described "crippled misanthrope" that she can focus on nothing but sleeping with him, falling to pieces every time he gently puts her off. I'm not saying older or disabled people can't have sex (my mother literally has one eye and no legs and she's a freak, true story) but this attraction feels more like a fantasy of the author than a real plot. The same holds for the main plot and subplots.
Several of the characters, including important characters, were dropped out of the sky. They have zero connection to the other characters or to the story, we do not know why they are there, and they serve no purpose.
The book is overwritten. It has its good points and there is some beautiful description, but keep your eyes open for the metaphors that are so corny they will slap you in the face and drag you out of the narrative.
His eyes felt like scratched marbles.
Moisture covered the window like plastic wrap.
Clouds covered the sun like someone holding a tissue over a yellow light.
There is also a significant amount of repetition in the language (I counted at least five instances where mist wetted someone's cheeks) and a few crazy run-on sentences.
It was only a few minutes before he came to a break in the trees, and then he saw it there through the gaps in the branches, a long winding road that led up to a castle overlooking the ocean, the road bordered on both sides by the private little forest."
Nolte engages in one of my pet peeves, obsessing about the size / weight of a larger character. One of the minor characters in the book is obese, and Nolte mentions it in nearly every other sentence. JUST IN CASE we forgot, fat person ahead. He describes her as wearing a sweater that could cover a boat. His tone turns pitying and judgmental. I hate that. People come in all sizes. If you aren't going to freak out about the exceptionally tall detective, don't flip out about the wide woman and beat me over the head with it.
The pacing is slow at the beginning but does pick up at the end. The resolution feels nice and complete.
Finally there are places where the book seems outdated, even though it is only 5 years old. The existence of pay phone booths and phone books, for example.
Overall, it's the kind of book that's great to pick up for free (which I did) and read when you need to kill some time. It's worth a couple hours of your time, although I'm not sure I'd say it's worth any money. Solid two stars.