What do you think?
Rate this book


Kindle Edition
Published October 31, 2018
Children who are taken for long walks every day develop stamina and endurance for hiking. Children who are taken to the pool regularly become swimmers. Children who spend every week playing baseball learn the skills of playing ball; and children who narrate consistently become thinkers and writers. Regular, consistent practice is all that is necessary-no special training is needed, and no tricks or shortcuts will take its place.
To make an art of narration, we begin with children's natural interest and ability to tell about something. We accustom them to tell accurately, consecutively, and fully. In due time, we encourage them to write their narrations. They begin by learning to write the same thing they would have said in an oral narration, and when that becomes natural, we teach them to take what they have written and shape it into familiar forms of writing, such as essays.
The historical seven liberal arts (grammar, logic, rhetoric, arithmetic, geometry, music, and astronomy) were called "arts" and not "sciences" for a reason. In the ancient world, a "science" represented a body of knowledge to be acquired. An art is not a body of knowledge; it is something to be practiced. An art is something that you do. This is why even in contemporary usage we speak of "practicing" law or "practicing" medicine. It is necessary to acquire some knowledge in order to be a lawyer or a doctor, of course, but when knowing is expressed by doing , it becomes an art.
Synthetic thinking, at its foundation, is the development of a personal relationship with the material being learned, so that the pupil achieves a level of familiarity with it that allows at least the potential for connecting what she is learning to things she has learned before or might learn in the future. Those connections are real for her only if she perceives them for herself, and the process of narration encourages this integrated, synthetic thinking as almost no other educational practice does.
In fact, writing, thinking, and even learning itself are all part of one process. As we articulate our thoughts, either aloud or in writing, we are at the same time sifting, classifying, selecting, and ordering. We are thinking. Narrating, either by speaking or writing, goes hand in hand with both thinking and learning.
If we recall that narration is, at its heart, a relationship-building activity, it will be easier to appreciate how beneficial it can be for older children. Often, traditional institutional school methods have dampened, damaged, or even destroyed the natural love of learning that bright-eyed little ones begin with. It is not the purpose of this work to criticize traditional methods, but it is sadly all too common to find that, as children grow older, they lose their love of learning.
The hungry mind of a bright, eager pupil is rarely satisfied with the meager sustenance offered by a bland textbook or a watered-down summary. If he truly wants to learn, he will look elsewhere and read books of his own choosing. Unfortunately, many children are forced to ingest too many "dry oatmeal" school lessons, and their love for learning withers. When learning ceases to be a joy, entertainment steps in to fill the void. Television, films, video games, and other time-consuming activities are available to entertain a passive mind, but they do not feed a growing mind.
The usual practice of questioning, in which a child is expected to produce an isolated piece of information, does not encourage synthetic thinking. Narration, on the other hand, requires a child to think about all of the material and produce the relevant details in relation one to another. What the narrator tells has to make sense.
Knowledge that is not easily measured and tested is often ignored in modern schools.