"The only effective motivator for chronically disruptive students is a positive relationship with a significant adult."
This book is part of the staff summer reading curriculum at my school. Although this is my first introduction to Love and Logic, I am already familiar with and in favor of its philosophy. This book is specifically critical of prescriptive discipline plans in public schools that do not enable teachers and administrators to treat students as individuals. I am 100% on board with that criticism.
Instead of following a byzantine and impersonal discipline plan, the author advocates for considering the following factors in student misbehavior:
1. the precipitating events
2. the child's intentions
3. the child's personality and temperament
4. the facts of the case, and
5. the damage or hurt caused by the misbehavior.
I think this individualized approach is definitely the right way to administer a classroom, and I am glad to see this philosophy spread. However, the book is written very hokily, almost as if Ned Flanders wrote it. The author's voice came off as very contrived, which I found off-putting.