On the one hand Bryne makes so deep political / socio-economic analyses of the Tudor court with fascinating reinterpretations of the primary sources, and on the other hand he seems to be saying to the other Tudor historians: "Come on guys, lay off, she's just a kid."
Bryne digs deep into the primary sources and places them in a cultural context that he points out almost every other Tudor historian has overlooked, savagely ripping apart the "love letter" theory, with excellent proof backing up his point, showing hard proof of how well Katherine Howard actually was performing her political duty as queen, the lack of evidence that she had any interest in the men she was/is associated with, and more.
What struck me the most was his reinterpretation of Katherine's comment about how "a woman may meddle with a man and yet conceive no child" which other historians have always jumped on as a sign Katherine practiced some sort of late medieval contraception. Bryne, however, points out the late medieval / early modern theory that a woman could not get pregnant if she did not orgasm - which he suggests means Katherine was actually talking about having sex that gave her no pleasure i.e. did not give enthusiastic consent. Wow. Mind blown.
Bryne also gets deep into the weeds over the motivations of everyone, and how different actions represented late medieval fertility rituals, or expressed deep rooted anxiety over male sexual performance, or shored up patriarchal honor systems, or represented the economic value of heteronormative marital/sexual behavior, etc.
He has a point, but I don't think he quite gets it just how unconscious these motives were. For example, somewhere in the world right now a man calls a woman a b*tch. There are undoubtedly socio-economic driven, ethnic-class, sexual-political environmental, reproductive anxiety based unconscious reasons behind this behavior. However, on a conscious level, it most likely merely "felt good" in the moment to utter that slur.
Howard, Mannox, Dereham, Culpepper and Henry VIII all had a long list of complex reasons why they acted the way they did - but I think Bryne gives them too much credit for the idea that they all knew at a fully conscious level all the whys and reasons for why they were doing what they did.
A good biography that asks some really good questions to shake up the status quo.