SO, I don't know what to say about this because I liked it a lot??? But I also had a lot of plot related questions that were not really answered and don't hold up if you look at them too closely?? So I'm conflicted, but I'm probably landing at 3.5 stars, and I'll round up because Grey and Beatrice worked for me. I would have preferred the suspecting-Joshua-of-murder part of their relationship development to have gotten toned down a little sooner, but since that was really more on Sheridan than anything and I did really enjoy Grey and Beatrice on their own, I'm letting that slide.
I should also mention a content warning here for sexual harassment and attempted incest as well as child abuse. The heroine's uncle had an extensive history of sexually harassing her, from when she was about 16 until his death, including attempting to blackmail her into becoming his mistress. The hero's uncle was also abusive, caning him and starving him as a child.
This book requires a family tree, and I referred to the one provided in the front of the book often in the first 20% or so of the story. I am not sure the family history here entirely holds up because the whole plot is based on Lydia, who married three dukes, and after each marriage, she had at least one son before her husband died. Thereby making her the mother of three dukes. This book was about Lydia's son by her first husband, the Duke of Greycourt. I have some thoughts on this:
-For one, I thought we'd actually get some information on Lydia's relationship with Grey's father. There were a few lines that indicated that this may not have been the happiest of marriages, but I also could have been reading too much into the fact that Lydia said she never officially came out in society before she married Grey's father. That said, the previous duke was in his 40s when he died, supposedly of an illness he caught from Grey when he was an infant. That leads me to believe Lydia's first husband was significantly older than her??? Plus, no matter what, he was clearly neglectful in how he arranged for Grey's custody after his death.
-Speaking of Grey's evil uncle, that guy is the Worst and I'm glad he's dead (Eustace is a great evil uncle name, as an aside). I'm kind of confused as to why this man, who was truly evil and is presumably the younger brother of the previous duke and therefore next in line to the dukedom after Grey himself up until the point when Grey has a son of his own, didn't just find a way to quietly murder 10 year old Grey to get what he wanted???? So the ten year old kid refuses to sign some properties over to you, and you cane him and starve him but you don't actually kill him, at which point you'd get all of the properties??? Obviously killing him would make this an entirely different series, wherein Thorn, Gwyn, Sheridan, and Heywood were trying to figure out who killed their brother, rather than who killed all of their fathers, but I am just saying, murder of a child doesn't seem so far off the mark for an evil asshole like this Uncle Eustace.
-I say that Eustace must be the younger brother of the previous duke, because they appear to be related via Eustace in the family tree, Vanessa's surname is the same as Grey's, and he was named as the sole guardian in Grey's father's Will. Having Grey's blood relationship to the family be through Aunt Cora (who also sucks!!!!) would have at least been an explanation for why Eustace didn't murder Grey to inherit though.
-Also, on the ten year old kid reads a bunch of books in the library and realizes that his uncle is trying to force him to deed unentailed property to him outright: HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA. Okay, but seriously, I don't pretend to understand everything about British property and/or contract law in the 19th century (although obviously a lot of US common law comes from England), so I can't speak to the legality of Uncle Eustace being able to get away with it, but there's a reason contracts signed by minors are not legally enforceable until they ratify them at the age of majority. ANYWAY, I'm just here to laugh about the fact that ten year old Grey apparently figured out some complicated legal documents all on his own. Sure, why not!
-Speaking of OTHER evil uncles, Uncle Armie was also the Worst. I don't have anything else to say on that subject other than he deserved to suffer more, tbh.
-I do, however, have some questions about the Armitage dukedom/line generally. I was expecting to get some answers on why Armie didn't remarry after his wife died to try to get an influx of cash for the struggling estate and/or try to produce an heir of his own, rather than just letting his brother inherit???? I was also expecting more answers about Beatrice and Joshua's parents, although maybe we'll get those in the next book since Joshua probably knew them better.
-One of my real sticking points here is the premise of this story is that Lydia married three dukes, which doesn't really make sense the way the Armitage line was actually set up. Lydia did marry two dukes, and she had Grey with the first and Thorn and Gwyn with the second, but then her third husband Maurice was actually the duke's second son, a diplomat, whose older brother was married and there was no guarantee Maurice would inherit. He apparently only ended up being the duke for a few months in the end! I'm explaining it in my head as after her first marriage to a man probably 20-ish years her senior, and then what must have been a very brief marriage to Thorn and Gwyn's father who died before the twins were even born, that she finally married Maurice for love, despite him being a second son. It's the only explanation that makes sense to me, and it makes me want a prequel novella telling Lydia's story. I don't think we're going to get one, but we should. Lydia's story is fascinating to me, and I wish we'd get to see more of it. Maybe then we could also get some answers as to the Armitage line because what we got in this book did not make a ton of sense. I spent a solid part of the first 20% of the book assuming the previous duke, who was Uncle Armie to Beatrice and Joshua, was actually Maurice's father and Sheridan and Heywood's grandfather. I just assumed Beatrice and Joshua's father was Armie's much younger brother. It was extremely confusing!!
-The sequel set up here is pretty good, but I am mostly excited for Sheridan and Vanessa. I suppose it's very convenient that Vanessa's dowry is doubled, given the fact that Sheridan is going to need the cash to save the estate from the giant mess his uncle left it in. I just hope that story is worthy on Vanessa because she's great, and deserves way better than her awful parents.
-Actually, speaking of sequel bait, it's hilarious how this entire family tree is going to become infinitely more complicated because the unrelated branches are just pairing off with each other. This family tree is bonkers, and I kind of love it.
-I don't have anything to say about the Thornstock line here because we really know nothing about Thorn and Gwyn's father. I'm sure I'll have Questions about that part of the family tree too though, so never fear. I can't wait to read their books and find out what those Questions are.
-I have spent quite some time picking apart the parts of the plot here that did not really hold up while only briefly mentioning the Sheridan-suspecting-Joshua-of-murder plot (lol), but I honestly spent more time wondering about the family tree issues than the murder plot, since it was immediately obvious to me that the ongoing murder mystery is the Glue That Holds This Series Together (aside from the fact that they're all related, obviously). This giant weird family was very charming to me anyway and I look forward to reading more about them, even when their family tree defies logic. I'll consider that a win.