Although 'Mobility Justice' was published in 2018, it took me back to writing up my PhD thesis in 2015. I wish it had been around then, as the concept of mobility justice would have been extremely useful to tie my conclusions together. A number of theories and academics that Sheller discusses did make it into my discussion, notably Urry's system of automobility and Kaufmann's concept of motility. On an intellectual level, I appreciated 'Mobility Justice' as a thoughtful and profound synthesis of mobility theories into something new and promising. On an emotional level, I found it hard to read as it gave me a sharply ambivalent sense of nostalgia. Writing up my PhD really wasn't a good time for my mental health, but at least I was immersed in my own research that I really cared about. That, and microwave rice packets, are all that kept me going at the time. In my academic career since then, I've spent virtually no time doing research that's meaningful to me. In an ideal world my research would fall within the scope of mobility justice; in reality I'm trapped in a business school teaching statistics.
Of course, none of that is any reflection on Sheller's book, which impressed me very much. It connects transport and environmental and social justice more carefully and systematically than anything else I've ever read. The central thesis is that previous theories have done so partially, without fully recognising the complexity of inequalities within mobility systems. Successive chapters focus on refugees and migration, technology and smart cities, car culture, and the environment. The interdependence of all is emphasised throughout. The writing style is academic without being obscure, despite drawing upon some challenging theorists like Paul Virilio. I found the concept of mobility commons helpful and was pleased that the principles of mobility justice mentioned in each chapter were brought together in an appendix. These are wide-ranging, further reinforcing the message that true mobility justice would require regulation of data collection, tax havens, industrial pollution, habitat preservation, and carbon budgets, as well as more buses. Several principles focus on cities, which I took to mean urban areas in general. (There is no internationally agreed definition of a city and national thresholds vary wildly. Some villages in the USA have larger populations than the UK city of Ely.)
It is a tribute to Sheller's good writing that I managed to read 'Mobility Justice' at all, given that the pandemic and work mayhem are making recreational non-fiction hard to manage. In retrospect it's astounding that during my PhD I read Slavoj Žižek for fun; I think my brain had more capacity before Brexit, Trump, and COVID-19. The effort to look past my own issues around academia was worth making, as 'Mobility Justice' is a thought-provoking and inspiring read. Notably, I hadn't previously considered the mobility implications of neo-nationalist anti-immigration policies. Sheller is also particularly good at explaining the contrast between frictionless mobilities of the super-rich and restrictions upon the low-paid who labour for their ease. The highlight for me, though, is this simple yet powerful statement: 'Mobilities do not just take place, they make place.'