Pat Morley got 24 men together and questioned them about issues they said matter most. He used this as the basis for this book, The Christian Man. Pat seems to be a nice guy who desires men to turn to Christ. His tone throughout is conversational and friendly, like a guy that comes alongside you and wants to show you a better way because he’s in the trenches with you.
Unfortunately, The Christian Man reads like a book put together by committee, too formulaic at points where it need not be formulaic, too vague were more clarity is needed, and outright dangerous at points.
I’m a pastor of a church in the Midwest, around the age that this book is meant to speak to. I see the type of men this book is meant for week in and week out.
While there are a few parts of this book that are well written and biblical, I can’t recommend it as a whole. The bad parts are bad, and they overshadow any good left in the book. There are better, clearer, and more biblically based resources to point people towards.
First, some good things.
Pg. 50 – on dealing with life balance – “you have all the time you need to do everything God wants you to do.” Agree 100%!
Pg. 57 – “We don’t use our personal experiences to interpret our Bibles; we use our Bibles to interpret our personal experiences.” Here here, Pat! Amen!
Ch. 4 on marriage is mainly helpful, especially the idea that you (and your spouse) aren’t going to meet each other’s expectations all the time, and the call of a husband to sacrificially love his wife.
The Theology of Work section (pgs. 192-204) is well done. I’d recommend that this section be turned into a little booklet.
Second, the unwise/unhelpful/bad things.
1) Paying your kids to do devotions. In the chapter on children Pat says he paid his kids to do devotions growing up. While this is certainly a personal preference issue, I can’t make sense of why anyone would do this. Seems like you’re setting up your kids to be rewarded materially for a spiritual activity. Though not unbiblical, seems unwise.
2) Using the story of Lazarus and people removing his bandages and saying that men needs friends that help change our “grave clothes.” Linking the story of Lazarus to friendships is a stretch biblically, and I just found the analogy forced.
3) The rest of the chapter on work and finding a satisfying job was not as helpful as the Theology of Work section. While I affirm that God generally wants men to find enjoyment in their work, God may not want you to have a satisfying job for a season of life.
4) Here’s the reason why I would NEVER recommend this book to anyone – the chapter on Lust. Does Pat say some true things about how to deal with lust? Absolutely. But he also says some AWFUL things.
When talking about lust, masturbation is an uncomfortable but necessary subject to talk about, and Pat addresses it. In a section on masturbation (Pg. 229) he writes - “You can masturbate and not sin.”
Really? How does that work? How could a person sin sexually and gratify themselves without lusting? I understand that in theory it could be done, but is it ever done without lusting?
Pat - What you wrote is careless and irresponsible, and it gives Christian men a loophole for sexual sin. Please think about this: the bar you’re setting for Christian men includes masturbation. Is that really where you think Christ wants the bar set?
If this weren’t distressing enough, he follows on the same page with: “Men are going to masturbate for pleasure. That’s all there is to it.” I had to walk away from this book after reading these two sentences.
Pat - If your conviction for what God wants for Christian men includes lusting and masturbation as a part of the Christian life, then I would ask you to rethink your entire ministry.
I would not recommend this book to anyone because of this section on lust.
I don’t understand how anyone reviewing could read this section and still think this was a good book to recommend to others.
Pat – if you read this – please get this book out of circulation and edit the chapter on Lust. What you’ve put out is spiritually dangerous for men.