While there are things to admire about the author's perspective, and some positives from the book which I will highlight in this review, overall Friendish by Kelly Needham is an ironically unhelpful condemnation of meaningful friendships. The first half of the book is spent dismantling people's attachment to friends and friendship. She routinely calls friendship a "waterless cistern" and more often a "treasureless field." "The only thing friendship can do" she says "is show you ONLY Christ has something to offer." Needham said that because of Christ we don't "need" friends. She stated that if we are lonely it is only because of our own sin, because we wouldn't be lonely if we knew Christ was our everything. It became clear as the book progressed that the author has numerous friendships, many of which have been so fabulous that it caused her to become idolatrous in them. This is alien to the experience of most people I know, who would praise God for even one friendship. Many are horribly isolated and without any meaningful friendships. Some women at my church are desperate for even one person from church to reach out to them during the week (which rarely occurs), one woman recently told me "I wonder sometimes if anyone ever thinks about me, what I'm going through... if anyone even cares I exist." We have an extreme dearth of friendship in our culture and society, so to condemn loneliness as merely the sufferer's own sin problem of not trusting in God (the nouthetic approach to friendship, as I call it) falls beyond flat. This also misses that the perfect Christ experienced grief from human abandonment and ostracization "he was despised and rejected by men, a man of sorrows, acquainted with grief."
I had thought I was reading a book about reclaiming friendship, but became mystified at the chronic condemnation of people for having or cherishing deep friendships. Clarity rang when the author explained "one of the very reasons I began to write on friendship in the first place" was because so many of her friends had such deep friendships that they became same-sex attracted. She believes to protect against developing same-sex attraction, friendships must be strictly utilitarian: seemingly only discussing spiritual things and confronting sin, never being too close, never using "romantic" language of friendship, and especially that friendship must be "without obligations" (she back tracks this point later in the book). I understand wanting to make a defense against Side B Christianity, but she ignores an enormous amount of the biblical data on friendship in her attempt to do so, and this fundamentally undermines her argument.
The author believes that any type of dependency on friends is sinful, and shows a lack of faith in Christ and a lack of focus on the gospel. I wondered what the author might say about Paul, who left Troas even though a "door was open to the gospel" there because "my spirit was not at rest because I did not find my brother Titus there" (2 Cor 2:12-13). Was Paul sinfully dependent on Titus?
A biblical emphasis completely missing from Friendish is the category of "affection." The book makes friendship strictly utilitarian, but Scripture speaks of the affections, which is not strictly utilitarian. "You are not restricted by us, but you are restricted in your own affections. In return (I speak as to children) widen your hearts also." (2 Cor 6:12-13). Notice even the marital vow language on relationships in the church: "Make room in your hearts for us... I do not say this to condemn you, for as I said before that you are in our hearts, to die together and to live together" (2 Cor 7:2) "We rejoiced even more at the joy of Titus, because his spirit has been refreshed by you all... And his affection for you is greater." (2 Cor 7:13-15). "For I seek not what is yours, but you... I will gladly spend and be spent for your souls. If I love you more, am I to be loved less?" (2 Cor 12:14a,15). "So, being affectionately desirous of you, we were ready to share with you not only the gospel of God but also our own selves, because you had become very dear to us" (1 Thes 2:8).
Oh that we would be able to speak of our relationships in the church with such a degree of personal affection and love, not simply a utilitarian purpose of sanctification. Of course, Godly friendships ARE sanctifying, but we "seek not what is yours, but you." This is like affection for God, which is a love for who he IS and not simply what he can do for us. We are meant to both give and receive this from friends in Christ: affection. Love that is not simply seeking an end. Kelly Needham condemns love for love's sake as idolatrous, and the book entirely lacks this biblical category of affection. I also have qualms with the premise that Godly friendship is "without obligations." Certainly Paul does not speak this way either: "Yes, brother, I want some benefit from you in the Lord. Refresh my heart in Christ" (Phil 1:20). Finally, Needham would need to take to task (besides King David and the Apostle Paul): Gregory of Nazianzus, Augustine, John Calvin, Andrew Fuller, John Ryland, and even the bleakly stiff Martin Lloyd Jones, who all employed extraordinarily positive and intimate (romantic) language of friendship. Shall we condemn these, and hundreds of other historical Christian figures, as simply idolatrous? Or could it not be as Michael A.G. Haykin says in his book on friendship "Iron sharpens Iron," that "Modern culture in the West is not one that provides great encouragement for the nurture and development of deep, long-lasting, satisfying friendships. Such friendships take time and sacrifice, and the West in the early twenty-first century is a busy, busy world that, generally speaking, is far more interested in getting and possessing than sacrificing and giving. Moreover, during the course of the twentieth century, popular Western culture 'developed an obsession with individual selfhood and sexual desire that marginalized friendship.'" I would encourage a read through of Haykin's book, because it shows that Godly friendships which are deep and intimate are yet the very best for sanctification of those involved and leads to much praise to God.
Now, with these critiques, it is important to say that there are things to admire within the book. For one, Kelly Needham clearly loves the Lord and promotes a full casting of ourselves on Christ. This is good. Certainly anytime friendship leads us away from the Lord, that is sin, and unhelpful to us. In later chapters, she urges people to learn to ask for help, which though contrary to earlier chapters' emphasis, is good and necessary. In later chapters she mentions that "the body of Christ has family obligations" and "Let's be bold to ask for what we need." Again, while at odds with other statements in the book (such as: if we think we need anything from friends it's idolatry), this is good. One of the best sections of the book was an examination of the role social media plays in our relationships. She explained that Scripture does not tell us to love our two-thousand Facebook friends as ourselves, but our neighbor, and that due to our limitations as people we cannot have endless relationships but must actually prioritize those within near proximity to us.
I want to close with two quotes. The first by Robert Hall, Jr, who says of friendship "under the general culture of reason and religion, it is one of the fairest productions of the human soil, the cordial of life, the lenitive of our sorrows, and the multiplier of our joys; the source equally of animation and repose." The second by Calvin, who wrote of his friends in the dedication of his commentary on Titus: "I do not believe that there have ever been such friends who have lived together in such deep friendship in their everyday style of life in this world as we have in our ministry... it seems to me that you two and I were as one person."