Shelving this as one of my most upsetting reads of all time. Dead School by Laura Gia West is about a teenage girl, Tina, who dies and finds herself in attendance at Dead School. Dead School is sort of like a Harry Potter meets Dead Like Me purgatory. Upon arrival students are placed into one of five divisions: Reapers, Recovery, Spirit Guide, Suicides, and Crafters. Each division has different duties and level of permissions as it's set up as a hierarchy, dependant upon where you are with your soul mission. It's kind of like a fun and spooky magic school after death (similar to angels, but definitely not angels), which is pretty cool. Reincarnation and death-is-not-the-end is a big theme.
Edit: Be warned that if you leave a review that is anything less than stellar, you may be harassed in the comments and the author will subtweet about you being a 'snowflake'. For me this book has consistent, heavily problematic themes throughout. These are my O P I N I O N S. Your opinion is not worth more than mine just because you disagree with my perspective, and you are welcome to feel however you want to feel about this book. You are also very welcome to write your own review. I'm not here to debate, I'm here to review this book.
The reason this book is so upsetting, aside from the problematic content, is that it has so much potential to be great. This is a book I could have fallen completely in love with, and it conflicts me to love so much of this book, but still rate it 1 star because the good parts WERE SO GOOD but the bad parts WERE SO BAD. The premise and worldbuilding which I would easily give 4-5 stars, is such a unique concept and played out pleasingly cinematical in my mind, but it wasn't enough for me to raise my rating.
I'm so upset because this book could have been an amazing Death Positive YA, but it was far from that. I just want to take a moment to express that the MC of this book is a teen, as well as the fact that there are three different school settings, so I'm going to assume the target audience is teens. Now with that said, this is a YA book that I would never consider recommending to a YA purely due to the negative content; it's uncaring, stereotypical, and sends a bad message. The primary message basically being that if you're not popular and you don't have many friends, or you don't get along with your family, or you haven't achieved much in your life yet, or you haven't fallen in love or haven't passionately connected with anyone (your pets don't count) and then you die, you "fail at life" and will be punished in the afterlife as if your soul has no inherent value. We're talking about impressionable young readers, here. I feel like this completely goes against what many people in this age group are experiencing, so why would you make it a point to attack them for it?? Embedding current societal judgements and hatred as a primary sense of what gives a soul value just wasn't the way to go here.
Aside from that, there were just so many problematic issues they were practically jumping off the pages. The MC Tina's toxicity, and the general toxicity woven into this book, is appalling. Tina has failed her life path of LOVE for the however many thousandth time, and is basically the scourge of Dead School. She's given one last chance to redeem her soul, by helping a living person achieve their life path. Sounds good, right? Wrong. Tina sure does like to think of herself as a victim, and at times she definitely is, but she's also very much a bully. Now, I refuse to believe that Tina is incapable of love. I flat out deny it. She loves her cat, her family, and herself - but not in the way people want her to. That doesn't seem fair to me. However, she is mean and toxic. Yes, toxic.
• The characters are extremely unlikable. Every. Single. Character. I couldn't bring myself to care for them. I feel like they were supposed to be strange and whimsical, and I'm totally into that, but the tone wasn't really...accepting, it seemed very judgemental, especially given the fact that none of them ever really truly redeem themselves. Just saying that they were redeemed doesn't count and honestly that irked me so much. I want to SEE their redemption, not just hear it. In my opinion Tina didn't redeem herself whatsoever, since the only reason she passed Dead School was because she was too afraid of reincarnating into a life that was not ideal, rather than because she changed or decided to be a better person. Lucky selfishness is not redemption, it's a shortcut back to stagnation.
THIS BOOK IS NOT FRIENDLY TOWARDS MARGINALIZED VOICES.
• Tina shames the girl she's supposed to be helping with judgements and sexism. She refers to her as being ugly/a loser/fat and the "antonym of femme" whilst judging her life (she's a geeky gamer), when it's obvious that this girl has mental health problems. Tina's lack of empathy was revolting. As someone with my fair share of mental health problems, I find this offensive.
• Judgement is CONSTANTLY cast on the "outcasts" of society. Goths are depicted as angry emotionally unstable suicidals, geeks as deformed hunchbacks with lisps and poor hygiene. She assumes a goth kid has lice because he itches his head when he's anxious, and believes he couldn't possibly be intelligent because of his visual aesthetic. "Black is a depressing color." Seriously, fuck off Tina. As a goth geek, I find this offensive.
• Queer-phobic. At one point "revenge" is taken in the form of Tina and her colleague hacking into this poor girl's Facebook and falsely/publicly outing two individuals as being gay with each other. They retaliate by becoming physically abusive to her, which indicates that there's something wrong with being gay. Yes, let's teach the bullies a lesson by falsely calling them out as queer so that they in turn will be bullied! That makes so much sense! If you couldn't tell I'm rolling my eyes here. This is not okay. I'll say it again, THIS IS NOT OKAY. What this is, is harmful and disgusting towards queer youth, and queers in general. As a queer person, I find this offensive.
• Internalized racism. If Tina fails dead school again, she will be punished by reincarnating as a homeless Asian man who dies of a 'chicken disease'. I mean, the toxic whiteness of this is just...wow. Who thought this was okay?? Really, I am shocked, and again, I find this offensive.
• Intrusions of privacy and personal space. Tina wants to know more about someone and, not accepting that they don't want to open up to her, goes behind his back and travels into the archives of his life to personally witness every single vulnerable, private moment of his life before he died (by suicide, which she was aware of beforehand). I have lost a loved one to suicide and I find this beyond offensive, I have no words.
• Not friendly towards individualism. We witness a problematic scenario where Tina serves 'detention' in the form of brainwashing shock therapy IN AN ELECTRIC CHAIR. She's unwillingly strapped to an electric chair and given 500 questions during her shock therapy which she had to answer either "yes" or "no" to, and if she answered 'wrong' she was electrocuted. This is child abuse. Why should you smile at a stranger just because they smiled at you first? Why should you trust someone just because they're being nice? The world isn't that simple and I am completely disgusted with the forced rhetoric that individuals are not allowed to put up their own emotional/physical boundaries of protection or self-love, that they must live and react within a bubble of someone else's comfort. Way to go, trying to condition young minds to think it's wrong to not accept the advances of other people when they're unwanted. This is sickening and beyond unacceptable. Again, I find this offensive.
And these are only the issues that really stood out for me, there are more, and they should have been addressed but were not. The tone of this whole book felt like a heavily theatrical personal attack against the 'outcasts' of society, the people who don't act the way the majority wants them to. I believe this book would have benefited from a sensitivity reader, since it deals with so many sensitive topics that I felt were not expressed in the best light, especially considering the target audience. Like I said earlier, this could have been so good, and if it didn't have all of these issues it would have easily become one of my favorites, but unfortunately I ended up really truly hating it. I am not sorry for this review, at all, whatsoever. Words and the ideas behind them are powerful, and we're really going to fill the youth with this hatred? Really? This is full blown cringeworthy judgemental shit and it's not cute/quirky.
Bottom line, I would not recommend this book, and I'm blacklisting this author due to their antagonistic attitude. If you can't take criticism maybe being a content creator isn't for you.
eARC provided by Black Rose Writing via NetGalley in exchange for an honest review.
Content Warning for discrimination, sexism, racism, fat shaming, consistent topic of suicide, mention of corpse deformation, loss of a loved one, invasions of privacy, queer-phobia, violence (physical, verbal), drug content via addicted parents, allusions to body dysmorphia, eating disorders, depression/anxiety/mental health disorders, child abuse and torture in the form of shock therapy, allusions to underage rape, multiple forced nudity scenes with a teenage girl, and religious themes. ♡