This was an OK book. It is written in a question/answer format, across 101 different questions.
Author Lasse Rouhiainen covers most of the current ideas and issues surrounding artificial intelligence.
While this book contains a lot of information for the reader new to AI, the more advanced AI enthusiasts won't find too much (if any) new information or ideas about the future of AI in here.
It's all pretty standard fare.
He talks at great length about AI "chatbots", talking about how useful they will be/are.
Well, maybe they will be in the future... Personally, I dislike nothing more when I call a company than having to navigate through some inept chatbot before reaching an actual person. He makes no mention of this consumer frustration in his chatbot talk. In fact, he even goes so far as to say how many people really enjoy talking to chatbots now. Where did he find these people LOL? I don't know too many people that would prefer to chat with a bot, over an actual person, when they call a company.
He also talks about how AI will revolutionalize the economy in ways that no one can fully predict. To offset the massive loss of jobs this will bring, he suggests a UBI (universal basic income).
While this sounds good at a cursory glance, he makes no mention of, nor addresses some of the major concerns around UBI, namely:
How will it be funded?
Will the small amount of money UBI actually proposes to dole out (~$10-12k/yr) be sufficient for most people? (I doubt it).
And most importantly (but not mentioned by him); What will such a large swath of the population do, with no job? No purpose in their labor to give their lives meaning? It will create an existential crisis that will see many/most of the now idle population descend into nihilism.
This could potentially be an unprecedented societal event, that could make or break civilization. He makes no mention of that, either...
One of the other major issues surrounding AI development is its use in military applications. Rouhiainen addresses this with some very "insightful" writing, saying: "An arms race in lethal autonomous weapons should be avoided." LMAO. No further explanations or discussion, however, on how this is to be achieved...
He joins respected AI researcher Max Tegmark, in his ridiculous propping-up of two "open letters", signed by 3,500, and 17,000 each, pledging to not build weaponized, militaristic AI.
Another resounding LOL to both of them, in thinking that anyone in the upper echelons of military brass will give two shits about some liberal AI researchers desires for pacifism when deciding to utilize weaponized AI or not...
It reminds me of many of the head researchers on the Manhattan Projects' desire to not actually drop the bombs they developed on Japan. They wanted to set them off on one of the tiny atolls in the South Pacific, in a display for Japan. Oppenheimer himself was vehemently opposed to actually dropping them on an opposing country.
Completely ridiculous, in retrospect, given Japan's reluctance to surrender, even after experiencing two nuclear catastrophes.
One can only imagine where the world would be now, without the Pax Americana that came into fruition after the dropping of the two bombs that ended WW2...
So, check this book out, if you are a newbie to the AI discussion, and would like an easy-to-digest cursory read.
But if you are thinking of reading this book in the hopes that it will read like something written by Ray Kurzweil or Nick Bostrom, you might want to give it a pass...