What do you think?
Rate this book
The Emperor Charlemagne
Few men have exerted such a lasting influence on the course of Western history as Charlemagne (742-814). At the height of his power in the early ninth century Charlemagne, King of the Franks and Lombards and Emperor of the Romans, ruled all the Christian lands of western Europe except the British Isles and southern Italy and Sicily. Charismatic, gregarious, energetic and cultured, he initiated and encouraged a renaissance of learning and artistic enterprise that appeared to later generations as a Golden Age. An incomparable general, administrator and law-giver, he was as skilled on the battlefield as in the council chamber, and by sheer force of character held together an empire that rivalled the Byzantines in the East. To the many portraits of the man who was crowned the first emperor of the Holy Roman Empire, Russell Chamberlin now adds a modern portrait which reveals the man behind the achievements. This book brings to life a key personality and a formative period in European history.
245 pages, Paperback
First published December 31, 1986
401 people are currently reading
781 people want to read
About the author
E.R. Chamberlin
41 books29 followersEric Russell Chamberlin (1926-2006)
Historian and author. Chamberlin was the author of numerous popular history books ranging from ancient Rome to twentieth-century Britain. Although he was born in Jamaica, he returned to England with his father during the Great Depression. Chamberlin dropped out of school when he was fourteen and became an apprentice leather dresser.
When he was old enough, he eagerly left this work behind to enlist in the Royal Navy in 1944. He served in the military until 1947 and then found work at the Norwich Public Library. It was here that his real education began, and Chamberlin took advantage of his vocation by reading history texts avidly. He later also worked at the Holborn Public Library and then for the book division at Readers’ Digest.
His first book, The Count of Virtue: Giangaleazzo Visconti, Duke of Milan, was released in 1965. This would be followed by thirty more books over the next three decades. Among these are The Bad Popes (1969), The Sack of Rome (1979), The Nineteenth Century (1983), The Emperor, Charlemagne (1986), and The Tower of London: An Illustrated History (1989). Also active in historical preservation projects, Chamberlin helped rescue the Guildford Institute building from destruction in 1982 and had a monument to Admiral Horatio Nelson constructed on Mt. Etna in Italy.
For the former endeavor, Chamberlin was recognized with an honorary degree from the University of Surrey in 1982.
Historian and author. Chamberlin was the author of numerous popular history books ranging from ancient Rome to twentieth-century Britain. Although he was born in Jamaica, he returned to England with his father during the Great Depression. Chamberlin dropped out of school when he was fourteen and became an apprentice leather dresser.
When he was old enough, he eagerly left this work behind to enlist in the Royal Navy in 1944. He served in the military until 1947 and then found work at the Norwich Public Library. It was here that his real education began, and Chamberlin took advantage of his vocation by reading history texts avidly. He later also worked at the Holborn Public Library and then for the book division at Readers’ Digest.
His first book, The Count of Virtue: Giangaleazzo Visconti, Duke of Milan, was released in 1965. This would be followed by thirty more books over the next three decades. Among these are The Bad Popes (1969), The Sack of Rome (1979), The Nineteenth Century (1983), The Emperor, Charlemagne (1986), and The Tower of London: An Illustrated History (1989). Also active in historical preservation projects, Chamberlin helped rescue the Guildford Institute building from destruction in 1982 and had a monument to Admiral Horatio Nelson constructed on Mt. Etna in Italy.
For the former endeavor, Chamberlin was recognized with an honorary degree from the University of Surrey in 1982.
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 30 of 58 reviews
October 25, 2025
I found E.R. Chamberlin's excellent history of Charlemagne at my used book store, and it is a welcome addition to my library. His writing style is superb and a pleasure to read. An excellent history book for anyone seeking to learn about this greatest of the Franks.
A member of the Frankish Carolingian dynasty, Charlemagne was the eldest son of Pepin the Short and Bertrada of Laon. With his brother Carloman I, he became king of the Franks in 768 following Pepin's death and became the sole ruler three years later. Charlemagne continued his father's policy of protecting the papacy and became its chief defender, removing the Lombards from power in northern Italy in 774. His reign saw a period of expansion that led to the conquests of Bavaria, Saxony, and northern Spain, as well as other campaigns that led Charlemagne to extend his rule over a large part of Europe. Charlemagne spread Christianity to his new conquests (often by force), as seen at the Massacre of Verden against the Saxons. He also sent envoys and initiated diplomatic contact with the Abbasid caliph Harun al-Rashid in the 790s, due to their mutual interest in Iberian affairs.
In 800, Charlemagne was crowned Emperor in Rome by Pope Leo III. The title represented the height of his prestige and authority. Charlemagne's position as the first emperor in the West in over 300 years brought him into conflict with the Eastern Roman Empire in Constantinople. Through his assumption of the imperial title, he is considered the forerunner to the line of Holy Roman Emperors, which persisted into the 19th century. As king and emperor, Charlemagne engaged in numerous reforms in administration, law, education, military organization, and religion, which shaped Europe for centuries. The stability of his reign began a period of cultural activity known as the Carolingian Renaissance.
A member of the Frankish Carolingian dynasty, Charlemagne was the eldest son of Pepin the Short and Bertrada of Laon. With his brother Carloman I, he became king of the Franks in 768 following Pepin's death and became the sole ruler three years later. Charlemagne continued his father's policy of protecting the papacy and became its chief defender, removing the Lombards from power in northern Italy in 774. His reign saw a period of expansion that led to the conquests of Bavaria, Saxony, and northern Spain, as well as other campaigns that led Charlemagne to extend his rule over a large part of Europe. Charlemagne spread Christianity to his new conquests (often by force), as seen at the Massacre of Verden against the Saxons. He also sent envoys and initiated diplomatic contact with the Abbasid caliph Harun al-Rashid in the 790s, due to their mutual interest in Iberian affairs.
In 800, Charlemagne was crowned Emperor in Rome by Pope Leo III. The title represented the height of his prestige and authority. Charlemagne's position as the first emperor in the West in over 300 years brought him into conflict with the Eastern Roman Empire in Constantinople. Through his assumption of the imperial title, he is considered the forerunner to the line of Holy Roman Emperors, which persisted into the 19th century. As king and emperor, Charlemagne engaged in numerous reforms in administration, law, education, military organization, and religion, which shaped Europe for centuries. The stability of his reign began a period of cultural activity known as the Carolingian Renaissance.
May 7, 2023
Royal reads project
November 11, 2020
This is a very complete and well-researched book about Charlemagne. You'll find everything from his family history, to his personality, his relationship with his loved ones and servants, to the way his empire was organised (very impressive!), how daily life looked like for peasants and how the yearly cycle looked like for them (loved this part), the first signs of upcoming feudalism, Charlemagne's struggles and triumphs with Rome and Constantinople, etc. etc.
I just cannot sum up everything that you'll find in this book, because the scope is so wide and yet the writer dives deep. I've learned so much. Not only about Charlemagne, but also about his world and the people who mattered most to Charlemagne.
Learning more about Charlemagne has always been on my 'history to do list'. I live at about 20 minutes driving distance from Aachen and I love spending time there. It's a relatively small city, but you can easily spend a few days there just scrolling through the historical city centre, enjoying the 'Carolus Thermen' (lovely spa complex!), and taking walks in the surrounding hilly forests. I can imagine why Charlemagne favoured this place and decided to settle down there.
When I finished this book I fully understood why this man has had such an impact during his lifetime and in all the centuries after. His legacy is great on so many levels. (But please be aware: of course he was not a saint. An early medieval ruler undoubtly had blood on his hands in one way or another.)
This aside, I'm so impressed by him. He must have been such an amazing person. Charismatic, VERY smart, politically astute, and a fervently loving family man. Many of his ideas and strategies were far ahead of his time. He started to implement many of them. Sadly his successors were not able to manage and maintain this and the Carolingian renaissance was therefore short-lived.
I thoroughly recommend this book to anyone with an interest in Charlemagne.
Many thanks to Netgalley and the publisher for providing me with an ARC.
I just cannot sum up everything that you'll find in this book, because the scope is so wide and yet the writer dives deep. I've learned so much. Not only about Charlemagne, but also about his world and the people who mattered most to Charlemagne.
Learning more about Charlemagne has always been on my 'history to do list'. I live at about 20 minutes driving distance from Aachen and I love spending time there. It's a relatively small city, but you can easily spend a few days there just scrolling through the historical city centre, enjoying the 'Carolus Thermen' (lovely spa complex!), and taking walks in the surrounding hilly forests. I can imagine why Charlemagne favoured this place and decided to settle down there.
When I finished this book I fully understood why this man has had such an impact during his lifetime and in all the centuries after. His legacy is great on so many levels. (But please be aware: of course he was not a saint. An early medieval ruler undoubtly had blood on his hands in one way or another.)
This aside, I'm so impressed by him. He must have been such an amazing person. Charismatic, VERY smart, politically astute, and a fervently loving family man. Many of his ideas and strategies were far ahead of his time. He started to implement many of them. Sadly his successors were not able to manage and maintain this and the Carolingian renaissance was therefore short-lived.
I thoroughly recommend this book to anyone with an interest in Charlemagne.
Many thanks to Netgalley and the publisher for providing me with an ARC.
September 5, 2020
Wow, I really enjoyed learning more in depth about the life, rule and other history of Charlemagne. ER Chamberlain does a fantastic job about discussing how society was then and the rulers failures/successes before Charlemagne became king. Yes, this is a history book and a memoir but reads more like a story thanks to the expert story telling and attention to detail Chamberlain is just so good at. I was engrossed after chapter 1 to the end!
If you want to learn more about early rulers in the world, I highly recommend this! Fans of biographies? This is a great and fascinating!
Thanks to Netgalley, ER Chamberlain and Sapere Books for an ARC in exchange for an honest review.
Available: 8/16/20
If you want to learn more about early rulers in the world, I highly recommend this! Fans of biographies? This is a great and fascinating!
Thanks to Netgalley, ER Chamberlain and Sapere Books for an ARC in exchange for an honest review.
Available: 8/16/20
August 16, 2023
I really knew very little about Charlemagne. We don't learn about him in school in the UK - as with many places, the way we learn history is quite parochial, focusing on our own history and the things that we want to see directly impacting upon it, and Carolus Magnus really didn't do so, directly.
And Britain is probably the only part of Europe for which that's true.
Only a generation or two from Teutonic War Band chieftain, he built an empire that included most of modern Germany and France, Italy, and much of the surrounding countries. He was central in both stopping the Islamic Umayyad expansion beyond Iberia and Hunnish invaders from the East, as well as building a culture of art and learning that the term The Dark Ages does a grave disservice to.
This book is an excellent overview, doing a wonderful job of placing Carl in his context - of descent, and the culture and religion of the time - and also of giving us a view of the economic, social and even technological forces along with the personal and political.
And Britain is probably the only part of Europe for which that's true.
Only a generation or two from Teutonic War Band chieftain, he built an empire that included most of modern Germany and France, Italy, and much of the surrounding countries. He was central in both stopping the Islamic Umayyad expansion beyond Iberia and Hunnish invaders from the East, as well as building a culture of art and learning that the term The Dark Ages does a grave disservice to.
This book is an excellent overview, doing a wonderful job of placing Carl in his context - of descent, and the culture and religion of the time - and also of giving us a view of the economic, social and even technological forces along with the personal and political.
August 29, 2020
Note: This book was provided at not cost by NetGalley, where this review has been posted.
Only when I started reading this amazing biography did I realise I had already read and reviewed another book by this author, i.e. “The bad Popes”. What made me notice this fact was the force with which I was immediately drawn in—so much so that I simply had to stop and check the author’s name, and there was the answer. E.R. Chamberlin knows how to tell history as if it were a story (which history basically is, of course—a collection of stories; no wonder both words have the same root, no wonder the same word is used for both in many languages).
Little is known with absolute certainty about this legendary emperor, anachronistically claimed as a national hero by the French as well as the Germans, so I was surprised by the length of the book. But of course, Mr Chamberlin doesn’t merely recount Charlemagne’s life. He first sets the stage, so to say, by presenting Charles’s predecessors and by describing how things were back in the years 400–800 so that the reader gets a very good impression of the times and the places. A seasoned storyteller, he excels in painting a vivid picture relying on the scarce sources that exist. He often warns the reader that comments left by writers of the time must be taken with a grain of salt as historiography back then was a different exercice from what it is nowadays. Personal likes/dislikes and political agendas were freely thrown in, documents were shamelessly falsified in order to underline one point of view or another, and one must read those contemporary writings with lots of caution, which the author does intelligently and sometimes with a sympathetic wink.
When reading this book, I was once again reminded how single-mindedly and often erroneously history is taught at school. Interpretations vary depending on where you’re living and are given a French, German, Austrian, English twist. Periods are cut up because it seems more convenient for pedagogical schedules. That’s why I like it when historians look at history differently while trying to keep their bias at a minimal level and attempting to show that history has always been more about flows and fluxes than about ruptures. The Roman Empire didn’t fall or end at a given date, not with Romulus Augustulus’s deposition at any rate, and Mr Chamberlin outlines that very well. Yes, the last Western Roman emperor ceased to rule in 476, but the Eastern Empire still existed, and Italy plus the rest of Western Europe didn’t fall into a political void suddenly filled by a barbarian upstart from the German forests some 400 years later. Reading this book, I was given the sense of how reality must have felt back then, how it was perceived, how it (maybe, probably) was.
So, this is a major sweep of a period that seems so dark and strange and that Mr Chamberlin peoples with men and women, that he fills with colours and scents. I got a pretty good impression of the vast Empire Charlemagne tried to build and think I know much more about that legendary figurehead now. The best thing is, Charlemagne doesn’t loom statue-like in my mind anymore but has become a person of flesh and bones. Some questions remain, and the author doesn’t try to come up with answers when there are none, yet, to be given with certainty. For lovers of well-written, well-researched biographies, this is a must-read.
Only when I started reading this amazing biography did I realise I had already read and reviewed another book by this author, i.e. “The bad Popes”. What made me notice this fact was the force with which I was immediately drawn in—so much so that I simply had to stop and check the author’s name, and there was the answer. E.R. Chamberlin knows how to tell history as if it were a story (which history basically is, of course—a collection of stories; no wonder both words have the same root, no wonder the same word is used for both in many languages).
Little is known with absolute certainty about this legendary emperor, anachronistically claimed as a national hero by the French as well as the Germans, so I was surprised by the length of the book. But of course, Mr Chamberlin doesn’t merely recount Charlemagne’s life. He first sets the stage, so to say, by presenting Charles’s predecessors and by describing how things were back in the years 400–800 so that the reader gets a very good impression of the times and the places. A seasoned storyteller, he excels in painting a vivid picture relying on the scarce sources that exist. He often warns the reader that comments left by writers of the time must be taken with a grain of salt as historiography back then was a different exercice from what it is nowadays. Personal likes/dislikes and political agendas were freely thrown in, documents were shamelessly falsified in order to underline one point of view or another, and one must read those contemporary writings with lots of caution, which the author does intelligently and sometimes with a sympathetic wink.
When reading this book, I was once again reminded how single-mindedly and often erroneously history is taught at school. Interpretations vary depending on where you’re living and are given a French, German, Austrian, English twist. Periods are cut up because it seems more convenient for pedagogical schedules. That’s why I like it when historians look at history differently while trying to keep their bias at a minimal level and attempting to show that history has always been more about flows and fluxes than about ruptures. The Roman Empire didn’t fall or end at a given date, not with Romulus Augustulus’s deposition at any rate, and Mr Chamberlin outlines that very well. Yes, the last Western Roman emperor ceased to rule in 476, but the Eastern Empire still existed, and Italy plus the rest of Western Europe didn’t fall into a political void suddenly filled by a barbarian upstart from the German forests some 400 years later. Reading this book, I was given the sense of how reality must have felt back then, how it was perceived, how it (maybe, probably) was.
So, this is a major sweep of a period that seems so dark and strange and that Mr Chamberlin peoples with men and women, that he fills with colours and scents. I got a pretty good impression of the vast Empire Charlemagne tried to build and think I know much more about that legendary figurehead now. The best thing is, Charlemagne doesn’t loom statue-like in my mind anymore but has become a person of flesh and bones. Some questions remain, and the author doesn’t try to come up with answers when there are none, yet, to be given with certainty. For lovers of well-written, well-researched biographies, this is a must-read.
April 3, 2024
A very interesting summary of the life of Charlemagne, a character who I knew little about despite his larger than life legacy. I hadn’t realised how the legacy of the Roman Empire played into the rise of the Merovingians and later the Carolingians.
At times filled with confusing tangents and anecdotes, but on the whole an accessible and interesting account of the first Holy Roman Emperor.
At times filled with confusing tangents and anecdotes, but on the whole an accessible and interesting account of the first Holy Roman Emperor.
September 26, 2021
Having recently read “Gaul under the Merovingians” by Christian Pfister (an excellent book which I really enjoyed), this was a natural progression. This is excellent narrative history written in an engaging and elegant style.
Charlemagne was a ruler of very great stature (literally – at six feet and five inches he must have towered over his subjects) and certainly deserves the high status later generations have given him. Pygmies like Bonaparte do not bear comparison. And yet, like most great men, he had significant flaws. Chamberlin gives a careful and detailed discussion of what he considers Charlemagne’s worst action – his execution of 4,500 Saxon prisoners. The context explains but does not excuse the deed.
The Saxon leader Widukind – of whom I had barely heard before reading this – is a fascinating figure in his own right and I was inspired to research him more. The description of the historical events in the Pass of Roncesvalles and the Song of Roland which it inspired is fascinating – not least for the way song and myth have developed the historical event to distort it almost beyond recognition.
In some ways Charlemagne reminded me of Marcus Aurelius, not least because of the way both men set up disaster for what followed them by arrangements they made for their succession. But despite his many flaws Charlemagne was entitled to be called “Great”, and Chamberlin gives us a very thoughtful and insightful portrayal of a vanished age.
Charlemagne was a ruler of very great stature (literally – at six feet and five inches he must have towered over his subjects) and certainly deserves the high status later generations have given him. Pygmies like Bonaparte do not bear comparison. And yet, like most great men, he had significant flaws. Chamberlin gives a careful and detailed discussion of what he considers Charlemagne’s worst action – his execution of 4,500 Saxon prisoners. The context explains but does not excuse the deed.
The Saxon leader Widukind – of whom I had barely heard before reading this – is a fascinating figure in his own right and I was inspired to research him more. The description of the historical events in the Pass of Roncesvalles and the Song of Roland which it inspired is fascinating – not least for the way song and myth have developed the historical event to distort it almost beyond recognition.
In some ways Charlemagne reminded me of Marcus Aurelius, not least because of the way both men set up disaster for what followed them by arrangements they made for their succession. But despite his many flaws Charlemagne was entitled to be called “Great”, and Chamberlin gives us a very thoughtful and insightful portrayal of a vanished age.
February 21, 2024
I dislike this website for not giving me an option for half stars. Because to give this book a 3 star is far too harsh but 4 stars is a bit too generous. It’s an alright book and if you are curious about Charlemagne it’ll probably scratch that itch. Yet this book felt a bit all over the place. Maybe it’s the material or organization - it might even be me. Something just feels off.
In short, the book is satisfactory but only barely.
In short, the book is satisfactory but only barely.
February 7, 2024
I lovedddd this book, and have so many fascinating takeaways.
Charlemagne. One of the greatest conquerors of all time, a man who laid much of the foundation that Europeans build on today. People like this in history take on as much myth as legend over time, and the author wastes no time in confronting these overblown narratives. The aim here seems to be that we would see Charlemagne holistically, and for who he was in actual fact; that he was just as fortunate as he was extraordinary, just as ruthless as he was chivalrous. I loved to see how his close relationships formed him, made him, and held him up over so many years. I also loved learning about who his main enemies were and why, especially those pesky Saxons. On a more meta level, I love how the author really digs in to Einhart’s firsthand accounts to bring us this wonderful biography in its full light. Just brilliant on all counts, and really has me gushing to read more history books. :)
Charlemagne. One of the greatest conquerors of all time, a man who laid much of the foundation that Europeans build on today. People like this in history take on as much myth as legend over time, and the author wastes no time in confronting these overblown narratives. The aim here seems to be that we would see Charlemagne holistically, and for who he was in actual fact; that he was just as fortunate as he was extraordinary, just as ruthless as he was chivalrous. I loved to see how his close relationships formed him, made him, and held him up over so many years. I also loved learning about who his main enemies were and why, especially those pesky Saxons. On a more meta level, I love how the author really digs in to Einhart’s firsthand accounts to bring us this wonderful biography in its full light. Just brilliant on all counts, and really has me gushing to read more history books. :)
April 19, 2025
A sharp, unsentimental portrait of one of history’s most iconic rulers. Far from the idealized image of a saintly Christian emperor, Chamberlain presents Charlemagne as a pragmatic, sometimes ruthless Frankish warlord whose genius lay in his ability to unify a fractured Europe through sheer force of personality, military prowess, and political savvy. The book argues that Charlemagne’s empire was deeply personal—more the product of his charisma and mobility than any lasting institutional structure. His coronation as emperor, Chamberlain suggests, was less a divine moment than a calculated move to assert dominance in a volatile geopolitical landscape. What makes this biography stand out is its clear-eyed realism: Charlemagne is not glorified but understood as a man of contradictions—patron of learning and brutal conqueror, devout reformer and opportunistic politician. Chamberlain’s writing is crisp, restrained, and rooted in historical skepticism. A great book befitting a giant of Europe’s history.
July 10, 2024
Good not great. The writing was hit or miss. Sometimes it was great, other times phrasing was awkward. I often found myself rereading a few sentences. The print I had was interesting as well.. some lines were spaced unevenly. Overall a good biography.
July 6, 2023
It's not bad but unfortunately like many books around this time and earlier a lot of the book is background information and not just a straight up biography of the subject.
January 3, 2023
Excellent. I found this book very informative and engaging, a really enjoyable read. The author does a magnificent job of providing background information without letting the narrative of Charlemagne's life bog down. It's all here: the origins of the Franks, the pertinent histories of Rome and Byzantium, the Merovingians, the Arnulfings, and finally Charles the Great, aka Carolus Magnus, or Charlemagne and the Carolingian renaissance that he brought forth. I knew very little of continental Europe's history during this era before I began this book, and I now put it down feeling enlightened and entertained. Highly recommended for history buffs.
May 9, 2023
"The Emperor Charlemagne" by E.R. Chamberlin is a fascinating and comprehensive biography of one of the most important figures in European history. Chamberlin's writing style is engaging and accessible, making this book a pleasure to read for both casual readers and serious scholars.
The book covers all aspects of Charlemagne's life, from his early years as a prince to his reign as king and emperor. Chamberlin explores Charlemagne's military campaigns, his political and administrative reforms, his cultural and educational initiatives, and his personal life and relationships.
One of the strengths of Chamberlin's biography is his ability to contextualize Charlemagne's achievements within the broader historical and cultural context of his time. He provides a vivid picture of the political, social, and religious landscape of the early medieval period and shows how Charlemagne's actions and policies helped to shape the Europe that we know today.
Chamberlin's research is meticulous and his analysis is insightful. He draws on a wide range of primary sources, including contemporary accounts and chronicles, as well as later biographies and histories. He also draws on the latest scholarship and debates to offer a nuanced and balanced interpretation of Charlemagne's life and legacy.
"The Emperor Charlemagne" is a must-read for anyone interested in the history of medieval Europe or the life and times of one of its most remarkable rulers. Chamberlin's biography is both informative and engaging, and it offers a rich and detailed portrait of a complex and fascinating figure.
Key Takeaways:👇
The importance of leadership in times of crisis: Charlemagne faced numerous crises during his reign, including military conflicts, political upheavals, and religious controversies. Through his strong leadership and decisive actions, he was able to navigate these challenges and emerge as one of the most successful rulers in European history.
The need for effective communication and diplomacy: Charlemagne was a skilled communicator and diplomat, and he was able to build alliances with neighboring kingdoms and establish strong relationships with his subjects. Leaders can learn from Charlemagne's ability to communicate effectively and build bridges with others, even in challenging situations.
The importance of adaptability and flexibility: Charlemagne was able to adapt to changing circumstances and adjust his policies and strategies as needed. He was willing to listen to feedback and make changes when necessary, and this flexibility helped him to succeed in a rapidly changing world. Leaders today can benefit from Charlemagne's example and be willing to adapt and change course when necessary to meet new challenges.
The dangers of pride and ambition: Charlemagne was a powerful and successful ruler, but he was not immune to the dangers of pride and ambition. He sometimes made mistakes and acted in ways that were harmful to others. Pastors can learn from Charlemagne's example and strive to cultivate humility and self-awareness in their own lives.
The importance of service and sacrifice: Many of the characters mentioned in the book, including Charlemagne himself, were willing to make great sacrifices for the good of their people and their faith. They worked tirelessly and selflessly to achieve their goals. Pastors can learn from their example and strive to serve others and make sacrifices for the greater good.
The value of moral leadership: Charlemagne was known for his moral leadership and his commitment to justice and fairness. He was respected and admired by many, even his enemies. Pastors can learn from Charlemagne's example and strive to cultivate their own moral leadership skills to inspire and guide their congregations.
The value of hard work and dedication: Charlemagne was known for his tireless work ethic and his commitment to his goals. He worked tirelessly to expand his empire, improve the lives of his subjects, and promote education and culture. Readers can learn from Charlemagne's example and strive to cultivate a strong work ethic and a sense of dedication to their goals.
The importance of learning and education: Charlemagne was a great patron of learning and saw education as a key to success. He established schools, promoted the study of Latin and other classical languages, and encouraged the development of art and literature. Readers can learn from Charlemagne's example and prioritize learning and education as a means of personal and professional growth.
The value of strategic thinking and planning: Charlemagne was a strategic thinker who carefully planned his military campaigns and political strategies. He was able to anticipate challenges and develop effective responses. Readers can learn from Charlemagne's example and cultivate their own strategic thinking skills to achieve their goals.
The importance of personal relationships: Charlemagne was known for his ability to build strong relationships with his subjects and allies. He was respected and admired by many, and his personal charisma helped him to achieve his goals. Readers can learn from Charlemagne's example and strive to develop strong personal relationships as a means of achieving success.
💥Bonus takeaways - Military prowess applied to life:
Flexibility and adaptation: Charlemagne was able to adapt his military strategy to the changing circumstances of his campaigns. He was not afraid to change course or try new tactics in order to achieve victory.
Strong leadership: Charlemagne was a charismatic and inspiring leader who was able to rally his troops and inspire them to fight for their cause. He led by example and was willing to take risks and make bold decisions.
Effective use of cavalry: Charlemagne relied heavily on his cavalry in his military campaigns. He recognized the speed and maneuverability of cavalry and used them to great effect in battle.
Strategic planning and preparation: Charlemagne was a strategic thinker who carefully planned his military campaigns and prepared his troops for battle. He was able to anticipate challenges and develop effective responses.
Alliance building: Charlemagne was skilled at building alliances with neighboring kingdoms and tribes. He was able to form alliances with other rulers and use their armies to bolster his own forces.
Psychological warfare: Charlemagne understood the importance of psychological warfare in military campaigns. He used fear, intimidation, and propaganda to weaken the morale of his enemies and inspire his own troops
The book covers all aspects of Charlemagne's life, from his early years as a prince to his reign as king and emperor. Chamberlin explores Charlemagne's military campaigns, his political and administrative reforms, his cultural and educational initiatives, and his personal life and relationships.
One of the strengths of Chamberlin's biography is his ability to contextualize Charlemagne's achievements within the broader historical and cultural context of his time. He provides a vivid picture of the political, social, and religious landscape of the early medieval period and shows how Charlemagne's actions and policies helped to shape the Europe that we know today.
Chamberlin's research is meticulous and his analysis is insightful. He draws on a wide range of primary sources, including contemporary accounts and chronicles, as well as later biographies and histories. He also draws on the latest scholarship and debates to offer a nuanced and balanced interpretation of Charlemagne's life and legacy.
"The Emperor Charlemagne" is a must-read for anyone interested in the history of medieval Europe or the life and times of one of its most remarkable rulers. Chamberlin's biography is both informative and engaging, and it offers a rich and detailed portrait of a complex and fascinating figure.
Key Takeaways:👇
The importance of leadership in times of crisis: Charlemagne faced numerous crises during his reign, including military conflicts, political upheavals, and religious controversies. Through his strong leadership and decisive actions, he was able to navigate these challenges and emerge as one of the most successful rulers in European history.
The need for effective communication and diplomacy: Charlemagne was a skilled communicator and diplomat, and he was able to build alliances with neighboring kingdoms and establish strong relationships with his subjects. Leaders can learn from Charlemagne's ability to communicate effectively and build bridges with others, even in challenging situations.
The importance of adaptability and flexibility: Charlemagne was able to adapt to changing circumstances and adjust his policies and strategies as needed. He was willing to listen to feedback and make changes when necessary, and this flexibility helped him to succeed in a rapidly changing world. Leaders today can benefit from Charlemagne's example and be willing to adapt and change course when necessary to meet new challenges.
The dangers of pride and ambition: Charlemagne was a powerful and successful ruler, but he was not immune to the dangers of pride and ambition. He sometimes made mistakes and acted in ways that were harmful to others. Pastors can learn from Charlemagne's example and strive to cultivate humility and self-awareness in their own lives.
The importance of service and sacrifice: Many of the characters mentioned in the book, including Charlemagne himself, were willing to make great sacrifices for the good of their people and their faith. They worked tirelessly and selflessly to achieve their goals. Pastors can learn from their example and strive to serve others and make sacrifices for the greater good.
The value of moral leadership: Charlemagne was known for his moral leadership and his commitment to justice and fairness. He was respected and admired by many, even his enemies. Pastors can learn from Charlemagne's example and strive to cultivate their own moral leadership skills to inspire and guide their congregations.
The value of hard work and dedication: Charlemagne was known for his tireless work ethic and his commitment to his goals. He worked tirelessly to expand his empire, improve the lives of his subjects, and promote education and culture. Readers can learn from Charlemagne's example and strive to cultivate a strong work ethic and a sense of dedication to their goals.
The importance of learning and education: Charlemagne was a great patron of learning and saw education as a key to success. He established schools, promoted the study of Latin and other classical languages, and encouraged the development of art and literature. Readers can learn from Charlemagne's example and prioritize learning and education as a means of personal and professional growth.
The value of strategic thinking and planning: Charlemagne was a strategic thinker who carefully planned his military campaigns and political strategies. He was able to anticipate challenges and develop effective responses. Readers can learn from Charlemagne's example and cultivate their own strategic thinking skills to achieve their goals.
The importance of personal relationships: Charlemagne was known for his ability to build strong relationships with his subjects and allies. He was respected and admired by many, and his personal charisma helped him to achieve his goals. Readers can learn from Charlemagne's example and strive to develop strong personal relationships as a means of achieving success.
💥Bonus takeaways - Military prowess applied to life:
Flexibility and adaptation: Charlemagne was able to adapt his military strategy to the changing circumstances of his campaigns. He was not afraid to change course or try new tactics in order to achieve victory.
Strong leadership: Charlemagne was a charismatic and inspiring leader who was able to rally his troops and inspire them to fight for their cause. He led by example and was willing to take risks and make bold decisions.
Effective use of cavalry: Charlemagne relied heavily on his cavalry in his military campaigns. He recognized the speed and maneuverability of cavalry and used them to great effect in battle.
Strategic planning and preparation: Charlemagne was a strategic thinker who carefully planned his military campaigns and prepared his troops for battle. He was able to anticipate challenges and develop effective responses.
Alliance building: Charlemagne was skilled at building alliances with neighboring kingdoms and tribes. He was able to form alliances with other rulers and use their armies to bolster his own forces.
Psychological warfare: Charlemagne understood the importance of psychological warfare in military campaigns. He used fear, intimidation, and propaganda to weaken the morale of his enemies and inspire his own troops
July 3, 2024
Scholarship on Charlemagne is really hard to come by. Records are at times sparse and mostly incredibly slanted. Chamberlain does the best he can and builds a very solid picture of Charlemagne. I find it more of a history of the Carolingian Empire.
To fill the gaps, Chamberlain devotes a lot of time discussing daily affairs of the domain. He also discusses the King’s interactions with the monastic scholar Alcuin, the Popes alive during Charlemagne’s period and other supporting characters. He also devotes time to the specific events such as the borderline Saxon genocide and minces no words in condemning Charles for his actions. Perhaps the most interesting aspect of the biography was the Frankish interaction with the Church and how that evolved. It’s a very balanced perspective that discusses the ins and outs of Frankish culture at the time.
I appreciated the time devoted to Aachen. I’ve always found Aachen so fascinating considering it is the original capital of an empire, yet it doesn’t exist today.
The writing was at times quite dull and dry and I wished I knew more about Charlemagne the person, but otherwise I felt this book was average at best.
To fill the gaps, Chamberlain devotes a lot of time discussing daily affairs of the domain. He also discusses the King’s interactions with the monastic scholar Alcuin, the Popes alive during Charlemagne’s period and other supporting characters. He also devotes time to the specific events such as the borderline Saxon genocide and minces no words in condemning Charles for his actions. Perhaps the most interesting aspect of the biography was the Frankish interaction with the Church and how that evolved. It’s a very balanced perspective that discusses the ins and outs of Frankish culture at the time.
I appreciated the time devoted to Aachen. I’ve always found Aachen so fascinating considering it is the original capital of an empire, yet it doesn’t exist today.
The writing was at times quite dull and dry and I wished I knew more about Charlemagne the person, but otherwise I felt this book was average at best.
This entire review has been hidden because of spoilers.
February 11, 2022
Despite the frustrating paucity of direct resources, the author of this book lifts the veil on the legend Charles the Great /Charlemagne is, making a historical description (albeit in clunky phrasing sometimes) of Charles’s reign and the radical changes the Franks brought to the history of Western Europe.
Charles, named after his very successful grandfather Charles Martel, led military campaigns almost every year and defeated, among others, the Lombards, the Saxons, the Avars and added vast territories to his realm.
A great supporter of the Popes, who relied on Franks’s armed help even before his reign, he was crowned Imperator Romanorum ("Emperor of the Romans") by Pope Leo III on Christmas Day 800.
It was seen as a ground-breaking event ever since. Nominally, the Roman Empire was The Byzantine Empire, based in Constantinople, but he was too far, its influence was too weak at the time and the Pope needed a supporter able to give him military help when needed. The act of bestowing the Imperial crown upon Charlemagne was also one of upmanship, showing the Vicar of Peter’s precedence over the earthly power of kings or emperors.
Charles accepted the coronation as the most powerful leader of his time and as a protector of the Church.
“Eleven years later, when he arranged the coronation of his surviving son Louis as co-emperor, he took very great care to ensure that the crown was bestowed by himself, and not by any representative of the Church — a precedent Napoleon Bonaparte was to observe and to follow.”
He took the resounding title of ‘Charles, Most Serene Augustus, crowned by God, great and peaceful Emperor, governing the Roman Empire and, by the mercy of God, king of the Lombards and the Franks”.
But the empire wasn’t meant to last. It was too big, too diverse, it lacked a functioning bureaucracy, a central currency, trading was mostly based on barter, the economy, despite improvements in agricultural practices (the three-field rotation system), wasn’t successful enough to avoid the reliance on war booty, the tribal laws and customs were not suited for the new statal organisation.
Following the Frankish laws of inheritance, Charlemagne wanted to split it into three kingdoms after his death. As only one of his sons outlived him, the empire lasted for another generation and was finally parted following a civil war between his grandsons.
The western part will become France and the “French propaganda successfully transformed the Frank, Karl der Grosse, into the Frenchman Charlemagne so that the Corsican Napoleon Bonaparte could eventually array himself in stolen robes and complacently announce, ‘Je n’ai pas succédé à Louis XVI, mais à Charlemagne’.”
The eastern side will split and reform several times over the years and the oddly named Holy Roman Empire will last for another 1000 years, until August 1806, when Francis II, the last emperor, abdicated under Napoleon’s pressure, releasing all the member states from their oaths of allegiance.
Charles was an outstanding leader, not necessarily a visionary, but his tremendous successes transformed him into a legend, and he was later claimed as an ancestor by many.
Unfortunately, Charles’s personality remains unknown, and, despite the author’s appreciation of the hero, he couldn’t paint the human side of the emperor. He didn’t even mention the language the great man spoke (probably a Rhenish Franconian dialect according to Wikipedia), he didn’t clarify the strange relations with his daughters, etc.
Charles, named after his very successful grandfather Charles Martel, led military campaigns almost every year and defeated, among others, the Lombards, the Saxons, the Avars and added vast territories to his realm.
A great supporter of the Popes, who relied on Franks’s armed help even before his reign, he was crowned Imperator Romanorum ("Emperor of the Romans") by Pope Leo III on Christmas Day 800.
It was seen as a ground-breaking event ever since. Nominally, the Roman Empire was The Byzantine Empire, based in Constantinople, but he was too far, its influence was too weak at the time and the Pope needed a supporter able to give him military help when needed. The act of bestowing the Imperial crown upon Charlemagne was also one of upmanship, showing the Vicar of Peter’s precedence over the earthly power of kings or emperors.
Charles accepted the coronation as the most powerful leader of his time and as a protector of the Church.
“Eleven years later, when he arranged the coronation of his surviving son Louis as co-emperor, he took very great care to ensure that the crown was bestowed by himself, and not by any representative of the Church — a precedent Napoleon Bonaparte was to observe and to follow.”
He took the resounding title of ‘Charles, Most Serene Augustus, crowned by God, great and peaceful Emperor, governing the Roman Empire and, by the mercy of God, king of the Lombards and the Franks”.
But the empire wasn’t meant to last. It was too big, too diverse, it lacked a functioning bureaucracy, a central currency, trading was mostly based on barter, the economy, despite improvements in agricultural practices (the three-field rotation system), wasn’t successful enough to avoid the reliance on war booty, the tribal laws and customs were not suited for the new statal organisation.
Following the Frankish laws of inheritance, Charlemagne wanted to split it into three kingdoms after his death. As only one of his sons outlived him, the empire lasted for another generation and was finally parted following a civil war between his grandsons.
The western part will become France and the “French propaganda successfully transformed the Frank, Karl der Grosse, into the Frenchman Charlemagne so that the Corsican Napoleon Bonaparte could eventually array himself in stolen robes and complacently announce, ‘Je n’ai pas succédé à Louis XVI, mais à Charlemagne’.”
The eastern side will split and reform several times over the years and the oddly named Holy Roman Empire will last for another 1000 years, until August 1806, when Francis II, the last emperor, abdicated under Napoleon’s pressure, releasing all the member states from their oaths of allegiance.
Charles was an outstanding leader, not necessarily a visionary, but his tremendous successes transformed him into a legend, and he was later claimed as an ancestor by many.
Unfortunately, Charles’s personality remains unknown, and, despite the author’s appreciation of the hero, he couldn’t paint the human side of the emperor. He didn’t even mention the language the great man spoke (probably a Rhenish Franconian dialect according to Wikipedia), he didn’t clarify the strange relations with his daughters, etc.
May 24, 2022
Crowned “Holy Roman Emperor” on Christmas Day 800, Charlemagne (or “Charles the Great”) is one of those larger than life, medieval figures, who strove to bring order out of the disorder of the collapse of the Roman Empire.
The 6’3 blond haired warrior conquered an empire than encompassed significant parts of Germany, France and Northern Italy. He also spurred a cultural and educational renaissance, as well as prompting significant developments in the papacy as a secular power; creating precedents and circumstances which were to have fateful consequences for Europe in the longer term.
And yet his empire did not survive his grandchildren, largely because of the inheritance customs of dividing a parent’s property equally between children. If Charlemagne had known primogeniture and if his empire had passed complete to each eldest son, Europe might well have avoided centuries of warfare between France and Germany.
Later Kings like Henry the VIII must have wondered how Charlemagne could have managed to divorce his wife and enter into a series of relationships and marriages, whilst still remaining in the good graces of the papacy. The author explains details like this, particularly explaining the weakness of the papacy which made the pope almost entirely dependent upon Charlemagne.
All this is told with energy and passion, and with asides to detail the sources and incidents of contemporary life. We hear of contemporaries like Alcuin and Einhard, and they are all set in their context, so that their contribution to narrating Charlemagne’s life and circumstances is clear to the reader.
The author does well to explain the smaller aspects, as well as the big events of Charlemagne’s life. For example, he takes the story that Charlemagne slept with a book under his pillow to help him learn literacy. The author suggests that there is good reason to think Charlemagne was literate, and that what he was trying to learn from the book under his pillow, was the distinctive handwriting style of Carolingian manuscripts. Its an interesting idea. It doesn’t make the book-under-the-pillow learning strategy seem any more sensible, but it does avoid a possible misunderstanding of its significance.
The book also narrates some of the confusing and odd aspects of Charlemagne’s life, such as his curious reluctance to let his daughters leave home. He preferred them to stay within his ambit, and have illegitimate children, rather than marry and leave. Historic sources sometimes imply dark implications to those facts, but the truth is no one knows why Charlemagne acted that way. So, the author simply narrates the facts, and leaves it as a mystery for the reader to ponder.
In places the book is a little repetitive. We hear in different chapters, for example, the same fact that although Charlemagne was crowned by the pope, he took care to make sure that it was him, and no churchman, that crowned his son. Sometimes the language is a little old fashioned with gender stereotyping. We hear for example that Charlemagne’s mother, Bertha has a “strong character, masculine in its direct approach, feminine in its subtlety” (Kindle 24%).
Apart from a few minor flaws like this, the book reads well and is a comprehensive and enjoyable history of a turbulent period in “dark age” Europe.
The 6’3 blond haired warrior conquered an empire than encompassed significant parts of Germany, France and Northern Italy. He also spurred a cultural and educational renaissance, as well as prompting significant developments in the papacy as a secular power; creating precedents and circumstances which were to have fateful consequences for Europe in the longer term.
And yet his empire did not survive his grandchildren, largely because of the inheritance customs of dividing a parent’s property equally between children. If Charlemagne had known primogeniture and if his empire had passed complete to each eldest son, Europe might well have avoided centuries of warfare between France and Germany.
Later Kings like Henry the VIII must have wondered how Charlemagne could have managed to divorce his wife and enter into a series of relationships and marriages, whilst still remaining in the good graces of the papacy. The author explains details like this, particularly explaining the weakness of the papacy which made the pope almost entirely dependent upon Charlemagne.
All this is told with energy and passion, and with asides to detail the sources and incidents of contemporary life. We hear of contemporaries like Alcuin and Einhard, and they are all set in their context, so that their contribution to narrating Charlemagne’s life and circumstances is clear to the reader.
The author does well to explain the smaller aspects, as well as the big events of Charlemagne’s life. For example, he takes the story that Charlemagne slept with a book under his pillow to help him learn literacy. The author suggests that there is good reason to think Charlemagne was literate, and that what he was trying to learn from the book under his pillow, was the distinctive handwriting style of Carolingian manuscripts. Its an interesting idea. It doesn’t make the book-under-the-pillow learning strategy seem any more sensible, but it does avoid a possible misunderstanding of its significance.
The book also narrates some of the confusing and odd aspects of Charlemagne’s life, such as his curious reluctance to let his daughters leave home. He preferred them to stay within his ambit, and have illegitimate children, rather than marry and leave. Historic sources sometimes imply dark implications to those facts, but the truth is no one knows why Charlemagne acted that way. So, the author simply narrates the facts, and leaves it as a mystery for the reader to ponder.
In places the book is a little repetitive. We hear in different chapters, for example, the same fact that although Charlemagne was crowned by the pope, he took care to make sure that it was him, and no churchman, that crowned his son. Sometimes the language is a little old fashioned with gender stereotyping. We hear for example that Charlemagne’s mother, Bertha has a “strong character, masculine in its direct approach, feminine in its subtlety” (Kindle 24%).
Apart from a few minor flaws like this, the book reads well and is a comprehensive and enjoyable history of a turbulent period in “dark age” Europe.
December 22, 2024
"The Emperor Charlemagne" written by the British medievalist and ancient historian E.R. Chamberlain, is a biography of the great Carolingian emperor Charlemagne (748 CE to 814 CE). Charlemagne is seen by Chamberlain as the foundational figure of modern Western and Central European politics and nationhood. Chamberlin also portrays Charlemagne as the bridge between the Germanic Barbarian past and the latinized Middle Ages, Charlemagne is portrayed accurately by Chamberlin as a Frankish Germanic King only one generation removed from traditional roles as a war chief, "first among equals." The development of Frankish rule, a rule by a minority group over a much larger Latin, Celtic, Gaulish, Italian, Greek, Lombard, and Saxon population. Charlemagne would define the role of the Holy Roman Empire, in relation to the remainder of the Roman/Byzantine East. All-in-all I liked Chamberlin's biography, he does a good job of portraying the Germanic giant who would be emperor as a human, who loved learning, war, his religion, and his family. Chamberlin covers the history of Charlemagne's time in depth, portraying the rise of the Umayyad Caliphate in Spain, Charlemagne's war with the Germanic Lombards, who like the Franks, ruled as a minority the predominately Latin Italy. Charlemagne's disagreements with the various Popes who ruled contemporaneously to him as well as his unlikely friendship with the Abbasid Caliph, Harun Al-Rashid. Chamberlin also does a great job of examining the darker part of Charlemagne's empire building, the massacres of the Saxon pagans and the destruction of the Avar Khanate. It's a superb listen, I would recommend it to anyone curious about this time in history, a veritable bridge between the rapidly changing Roman world and the medieval world.
February 9, 2021
A new topic for me - this is the first time I've read about Charlemagne, though obviously like anyone else I know who he was, and that his son is depicted in VIKINGS on Amazon TV! Being the historian I am, I had to find out more about this enigmatic genocidal and war-mongering king - that's who he is from what I can gather, even now. A later Caesar or Alexander, or if you take it forward in time, he's an earlier prototype of Ghenghis, Saladin (though he was more of a conciliatary leader than many think) or even a Napoleon/Hitler... there are plenty of examples of genocidal leaders, at once charismatic and blood-thirsty, but always with the position to back up their thoughts into action!
This book shows in detail a little more in depth about this character, and not apologising, merely telling the story in the context of the times. After all, these are the times of Papal leadership in war, of poverty meaning eating nothing, not scraps, but nothing, living in rags and getting wet when it rains. We know nothing of poverty unless we know what going to sleep starving on the side of the road with no blanket and the threat of wolves and the like there to scare us awake in case we make a nice meal... that's poverty in these times. And it was Charlemagne who began many other noble abuses of the population, but that's in here, and no spoilers, but suffice to say, after reading this, the charming and enigmatic character history shows is far far from the truth!
Worth reading if you want to know more about 8th/9th century life and leadership.
This book shows in detail a little more in depth about this character, and not apologising, merely telling the story in the context of the times. After all, these are the times of Papal leadership in war, of poverty meaning eating nothing, not scraps, but nothing, living in rags and getting wet when it rains. We know nothing of poverty unless we know what going to sleep starving on the side of the road with no blanket and the threat of wolves and the like there to scare us awake in case we make a nice meal... that's poverty in these times. And it was Charlemagne who began many other noble abuses of the population, but that's in here, and no spoilers, but suffice to say, after reading this, the charming and enigmatic character history shows is far far from the truth!
Worth reading if you want to know more about 8th/9th century life and leadership.
March 1, 2024
This book helped me clarifying the relationship between the Franks and their descendants (France and Germany, the Third Reich…), and why only the French kept the name (and not the language, interestingly enough). Though to be fair this clarification was more the result of successive web searches rather than the book itself, which mainly served as a spark.
As for the rest, the history of that period is still one of decadence and destruction (of the Roman civilization), and as much as the tales of the Merovingians and the Carolingians and the Saxons and the Avars and all the other happy tribes are interesting nothing takes away from the misery of the advancing Dark Ages (and yes, they are rightly called so, despite all efforts of reevaluating them, which is the result of historians having less to write about and focusing on smaller events — and yes+1, I am no expert, so these are all opinions).
As for the rest, the history of that period is still one of decadence and destruction (of the Roman civilization), and as much as the tales of the Merovingians and the Carolingians and the Saxons and the Avars and all the other happy tribes are interesting nothing takes away from the misery of the advancing Dark Ages (and yes, they are rightly called so, despite all efforts of reevaluating them, which is the result of historians having less to write about and focusing on smaller events — and yes+1, I am no expert, so these are all opinions).
March 19, 2022
A richly evocative biography
The saga of the Franks’ struggle for mastery in Europe is vividly brought to life by E.R Chamberlin. At times this biography reads more like a stirring historical thriller novel, and that is clearly intentional. The biography takes some time to really introduce its central subject, darting back and forth between the founding of the Merovingian dynasty by Clovis and the ignominious collapse of that hollowed out dynasty. While this world building context is necessary, it’s really only once Charlemagne comes to the throne that this biography really becomes a captivating read. The author brings the politics, culture, theology and palace intrigue that defined his reign to life with flair and also gives us a great sense of the wider sweep of events across Europe and Asia Minor.
Well worth a read.
The saga of the Franks’ struggle for mastery in Europe is vividly brought to life by E.R Chamberlin. At times this biography reads more like a stirring historical thriller novel, and that is clearly intentional. The biography takes some time to really introduce its central subject, darting back and forth between the founding of the Merovingian dynasty by Clovis and the ignominious collapse of that hollowed out dynasty. While this world building context is necessary, it’s really only once Charlemagne comes to the throne that this biography really becomes a captivating read. The author brings the politics, culture, theology and palace intrigue that defined his reign to life with flair and also gives us a great sense of the wider sweep of events across Europe and Asia Minor.
Well worth a read.
April 3, 2022
Arguably the best utilisation of the apparently scant contemporary first hand material available. Covers the big events of the reign while also giving an overview of the World including the (generally under attested) minutiae of peasant lives that feels authentic & based on research of written/archaeological materials (at the time of writing) rather than simply a hypothetical. The fact it’s a product of its time does shine through less positively in its depiction of non European components of the era (though that could be a literary device I hadn’t picked up on, reflecting the mindset of the material’s setting). Very well done overall, I’d doubt anyone’s written a more informative account of Charlemagne since.
October 22, 2025
A very thorough history of the Emperor. I was curious about the medieval era and he played a big role in establishing Christianity in the huge European realm he ruled. His contributions to culture and education were impressive and it was a shame that it fell apart when he divided his realm into 3 and left it to his sons which caused wars and ruin. He was an extremely intelligent man and surrounded himself with learned men. He was also a good parent according to this research - but had some unusual practices re: his daughters in that he wouldn't let them marry but was OK with them having illigitimate children. It could be that he couldn't stand the possibility that some husband would be abusive to them. I really enjoyed the well rounded biography this author provided.
December 7, 2020
After reading that all Europeans are related to this man, I needed to read more about him! He's an early ancestor of many of us and sometimes it's just fun to shake the family tree and see who falls out. I've always thought Charlemagne was a fascinating character in history. It was a mostly interesting read. I remembered quite a bit from college history, so I could skim some! It was well researched and I am sure many who enjoy this period of history, will love this book. Make a fine gift for the arm chair historian to enjoy during this dark days!
I receiced a Kindle arc from Netgalley in exchange for a fair review.
I receiced a Kindle arc from Netgalley in exchange for a fair review.
June 25, 2023
Probably could find a better biography of Charlemagne.
As a biography it’s weak. Though the Author is critical of Einhard at points, he also consistently presents Charlemagne in the most positive light. Why not just read Einhard then?
As a history it’s poor. The sources are not discussed thoroughly and alternative possibilities are never mentioned. The paucity of documentation from the period renders this certainty delusional.
Additionally the history is whiggish, focusing on personalities and “races” (barf) at the expense of the cultural, economic, and societal changes happening in extremely interesting tradition period punctuated by Charlemagne’s rule.
As a biography it’s weak. Though the Author is critical of Einhard at points, he also consistently presents Charlemagne in the most positive light. Why not just read Einhard then?
As a history it’s poor. The sources are not discussed thoroughly and alternative possibilities are never mentioned. The paucity of documentation from the period renders this certainty delusional.
Additionally the history is whiggish, focusing on personalities and “races” (barf) at the expense of the cultural, economic, and societal changes happening in extremely interesting tradition period punctuated by Charlemagne’s rule.
January 31, 2025
E.R. Chamberlain’s biography of the Holy Roman Emperor Charlemagne could also be titled a brief history of the early Middle Ages as it provides a very good summary of those times from king, pope, and peasant alike.
Chamberlain highlights Charlemagne’s illustrious heritage (being the grandson of Charles Martel, victor over the Muslims at Poitiers) consolidation of power over the Franks, and establishment of firm relations with the Pope Leo III.
I do wish there were more details on Charlemagne’s military campaigns, but there are good overviews of his notable victories over the Muslims in Spain, the Lombards in Italy, Saxons in Germania, and over the wealthy Avars.
I enjoyed it: 4/5
Chamberlain highlights Charlemagne’s illustrious heritage (being the grandson of Charles Martel, victor over the Muslims at Poitiers) consolidation of power over the Franks, and establishment of firm relations with the Pope Leo III.
I do wish there were more details on Charlemagne’s military campaigns, but there are good overviews of his notable victories over the Muslims in Spain, the Lombards in Italy, Saxons in Germania, and over the wealthy Avars.
I enjoyed it: 4/5
February 9, 2021
Charlemagne -- Holy Roman Emperor
A summation of the founding of the Carolingians and at Charlemagne as a real man. It's not hard to envision him was a leader, so the brief looks at him as a man are quite interesting. After all the military history and politics, I'm left wanting to know more about his private life.
A summation of the founding of the Carolingians and at Charlemagne as a real man. It's not hard to envision him was a leader, so the brief looks at him as a man are quite interesting. After all the military history and politics, I'm left wanting to know more about his private life.
February 9, 2021
Historically intresting
This is the basis for European unity and gives the reasons for the difficulty that Europe has suffered through the centuries of fighting unity in favor of disunity. It gives reason for the British separation from Europe as they did not participate in the elites created after the fall of Rome.
This is the basis for European unity and gives the reasons for the difficulty that Europe has suffered through the centuries of fighting unity in favor of disunity. It gives reason for the British separation from Europe as they did not participate in the elites created after the fall of Rome.
March 3, 2021
Not a bad read
Though easy to read, too much space has been used in sideline chronicles. It is granted that the facts of the times of Charlemagne do not exist, but that is no excuse in filling up the volume with anecdotes and unrelated tales. The book could have been much shorter, which I am sure, would have made it more enjoyable.
Though easy to read, too much space has been used in sideline chronicles. It is granted that the facts of the times of Charlemagne do not exist, but that is no excuse in filling up the volume with anecdotes and unrelated tales. The book could have been much shorter, which I am sure, would have made it more enjoyable.
Displaying 1 - 30 of 58 reviews