What do you think?
Rate this book


399 pages, Paperback
First published November 26, 2018
“Ezra Maas was the one. I knew it instinctively. No one had told his story. His art was filled with strange, autobiographical fragments and symbols that said everything and nothing, so dense with meaning that it overflowed, haemorrhaging in possibilities. Maas didn’t have to hide his secrets, he casually scattered them on the ground for all to see and watched the trees grow up around him. For in a forest of signs, nothing could be seen clearly at all.”
“All I know for sure is that Maas’s absence is the centre of the book. It’s the catalyst, the inciting incident, and its effects reverberate through the past, present and future.”
As in the short stories of Borges, Daniel’s protagonist is a version of himself. In some ways, the manuscript could be considered an experiment in autofiction, to utilise a recent term. Yet, as I have previously stated, this is not the Daniel I once knew, but a fictionalised “character”, distinct and separate from the “authorial” Daniel. Again, as with the overt use of noir and postmodern techniques in the exterior structure of the narrative. I believe Daniel was playing a game with the reader by including himself in the text and uses his own identity as another form of misdirection. Admittedly, it took me some time to realise the “double game” that was being played here and, while I have not evidence to prove it, I have a compelling theory about Daniel’s identity which you can read on page xx
“There are rooms within rooms, worlds within worlds … it has reimagined how we engage with artwork …”
I came to realise that all of the stories and layers, Daniel’s, Ezra’s, mine, yours, were one and the same, in the end.
You may come to see this book as many things, a biography, a detective novel, a love letter, a true story, a work of fiction, a forsaken text, an encyclopaedic narrative, or something else entirely. It is all of these things are more.
In final summary, the book is legion, for it is many things


Ezra Maas is a reclusive British artist who first became famous in New York in the 1960s. Unlike his contemporaries, Maas rejected the cult of celebrity, never giving interviews and refusing to be photographed, insisting that his radical artwork speak for him. He was intensely private and his exhibitions were surrounded in secrecy. This created a kind of anti-fame around him and he quickly gained a cult following as a result. Maas went on to exhibit work in galleries and museums around the world, including Paris, Bruges, Berlin and Switzerland.How James became involved in the project:
From the 1980s onwards, he was rumoured to be working from a studio mansion in the Hertfordshire countryside, but as ever with Maas, nothing could be sure. There were stories of agoraphobia, drug addiction, mental illness, as well as links to cult-like groups who claimed there were hidden messages in his work, but most of these stories were dismissed as tabloid gossip. Less and less was heard from Maas throughout the 1990s, although he continued to produce new work, adopting new technologies and releasing pieces via his website.
Maas disappeared under mysterious circumstances from his studio in the mid-2000s after announcing plans for his final and most important artwork. His representatives, The Maas Foundation, continue to maintain and protect his legacy, staging retrospectives and selling his work for larger amounts every year. Many believe Maas is dead, but others claim he’s simply in seclusion and will return when his final work is complete.
(from https://www.thebooktrail.com/authorso...)
Six years after Maas was officially registered as missing in 2005, Daniel received a late night phone call from a mysterious third party and embarked on his life story of Maas.James's own take on what he had written:
In 2012 the book was ready to go – and then, out of the blue, the Maas Foundation scheduled a press conference.
Could it have been to declare that the artist was dead... or alive? Or could it have been to unveil the masterpiece that he allegedly went into seclusion to work on?
(http://narcmagazine.com/feature-danie... and https://www.chroniclelive.co.uk/whats... and https://rhystranter.com/2017/08/23/da...)
It is an unorthodox hybrid of literary fiction, biography and detective story, written by a former journalist and told through a combination of prose fiction, biographical chapters, news clippings, academic footnotes, emails, phone transcripts and more. Given these origins, the novel occupies a unique space at the intersection between truth and fiction, history and myth.His literary influences:
(from http://newwritingnorth.com/journal/ar...)
Paul Auster, Raymond Chandler, Samuel Beckett. James Joyce, Thomas Pynchon, Philip Pullman, Philip K Dick, Jorge Luis Borges, Alasdair Grey, Flann O’Brien, David Lynch.(from https://deadinkbooks.com/post-truth-d... https://elementaryvwatson.wordpress.c...and to that male-dominated list should be added Virginia Woolf, whose Orlando is one clear precedent for this work, and who is quoted, early on in the book, from To The Lighthouse:
and https://www.livingnorth.com/northeast... )
What art was there, known to love or cunning, by which one pressed through into these secret chambers? ... How then, she had asked herself, did one know one thing or another thing about people, sealed as they were?A fascinating and disturbing work. And perhaps most disturbingly of all, while writing this review, a Twitter notification appeared on my account ...

and The New York Trilogy
will love this book.