A partir del momento en que Lévi Strauss eligió a los kachin de Birmania como una de las etnografías clave para su demostración del intercambio general y Leach empezó a publicar diversos trabajos de campo, dicha tribu ha adquirido un carácter paradigmático para la antropología, sólo comparable a los trobriand eestudiados por Malinowski o los nuer estudiados por Evans-Pritchard.
SISTEMAS POLÍTICOS DE LA ALTA BIRMANIA es una de las piedras angulares de la llamada antropología política. Publicado por primera vez en 1954 en abierto desafío a sus colegas, que sostenían que la mejor manera de comprender a las sociedades primitivas era a través de modelos de equilibrio, el libro de Leach hace irrumpir la historia, bien que cíclica, en escena. Como ha señalado recientemente un agudo crítico (J. Friedman), el estudio de Leach plantea un problema antropológico de primera magnitud; los kachin ofrecen un ejemplo de evolución reversible, es decir, de un sistema político que, por lo menos en apariencia, oscila entre un régimen igualitario y un régimen jerárquico (en última instancia clasista). ¿Cómo es ello posible? A través de un fino análisis de la sociedad kachin, Leach propone una teoría del cambio social que ha ejercido una influencia duradera en la teoría antropológica.
This is an anthropological classic of the first water - and one of the books that opened my eyes to what anthropology could be. It's hard to explain how reading about hill tribes in Southeast Asia where powerful people periodically try to create little kingdoms (gumsa) in imitation of the Shan states in the valleys, but where the complexities of their forms of agriculture and marriage systems inevitably lead them to collapse and form democratic republics (gumlao) again - and then the whole cycle starts all over again - but when you read it, you are entranced. Well, okay, I was. It's books like this that made me want to dedicate my life to anthropology.
Ouch, I had to read something anthropological/ethnographical again. Those things are always more like a badly sorted collection of stories that either the ethnologist or his informants experienced, mixed with uncertain and imprecise ideas about what everything means or what it might be important for. It's like reading a book of folklore stories and legends. Entertaining (sometimes), but not always very helpful in understanding the actual social relationship or the history of the people. Historical facts were present in the book, though only in one chapter presented as a really really short overview, almost as if it's not important. I realize that this book is a classic and more than 60 years old, but the standards of writing scientific material can't have been that low back then. I did learn many important things from this book, about the Kachin (Jinghpaw) and the Shan, but it was very bothersome to extract important and useful information and seperate them from all the side-notes. I really cannot recommend this book, unless you want to research mid-20th century ethnological British writing style. Sadly, this style is still so common among ethnologists.
Old classics like these are still so important to anthropology. Leach shows that many of the refined techniques used today were also in practice during the early days. Read this as a companion to Witchcraft, Oracles and Magic among the Azande by Evans-Pritchard and enjoyed the different ethnographic techniques used.
THE anthropological work on Upper Burma/Myanmar, particularly the Kachin and Shan States. It remains 'The Burmese Bible' more than fifty years since its first publication in 1954. A must read.
Originally I had read another version of this book, but I got this one for free, so I put it into my virtual bookshelf. Read my original review here: https://www.goodreads.com/review/show...