Jon Sopel’s excellent previous book “If only they didn’t speak English …” is a perceptive portrait of modern America that explains, amongst much else, why so many Americans support Donald Trump, and ultimately elected him as their president. Here Sopel describes some consequences of that support.
“A Year at the Circus” mainly covers events during 2017, 2018 and early 2019; the foreword is dated July 2019, but the final sentence of the paperback edition published in 2020 mentions ‘a coronavirus’. The ‘Circus’ of the title refers the White House, or more broadly the executive branch of the US Government, during Donald Trump’s presidency, up to the release of Robert Mueller’s report on his investigations into possible collusion between the Trump election campaign and the Russians.
This carefully researched (given Sopel’s reputation, and the scope for litigation, one can be pretty confident that it has been carefully researched) and readable book takes us on a tour of the main rooms of the White House, and some other key spaces, and examines the roles and inter-relationships of the people who use them. In doing so, Sopel reveals much of the extent of dysfunction of Donald Trump as a politician, and that of his executive in general. Sopel has the benefit of access to considerable journalistic resources, in addition to his own experience, skills and insight, so there is a great deal here that never made it to the evening news, or the front pages, and much additional explanation of stuff that did.
So far as I can tell, the reporting here is pretty objective; which means that it is mostly highly critical, if not condemnatory, of Trump and his supporters in government. In some ways, the most surprising fact is revealed in the final chapter: according to an opinion poll of that time (2019), Sopel tells us, a majority of Americans thought that Trump is a liar – but mostly they don’t care to do anything about it. Sopel writes: ‘ It is hard to think that any of [Trump’s] predecessors could have survived some of the lacerating conclusions of [the Mueller] report’, or, he could have added, public perception of a great deal of Trump’s other behaviour described in this lucid and compelling book.