More like one and a half stars. This author had crossed my radar a few times and from the glowing reviews and the "New York Times bestselling author" tag, I thought Sarah Jio would be worth reading. I chose The Last Camellia because it was set at an English manor, had a garden theme, and was a dual time frame - all things that tick my boxes. I should have gotten my first clue when the only copy the library owned was the large print edition. The book jacket showed a lovely ivy-covered stone English manor house, the exact same picture I had seen in an ad for a British home decorating magazine. It must have been a stock photo for 'charming English home,' but I fell for it. Taken in by a book cover and blurb, again.
Where do I begin? This book has a ludicrous set-up. The 1940 protagonist Flora is a baker's daughter in New York who likes plants and volunteers at the Botanical Garden. A plant thief hires her to steal a rare camellia at an estate in England by putting her in the position of nanny at the estate. She takes the job because her family is in financial straits, though she has no experience working with children and is an only child herself. Huh? No one in the children's family checks her background or interviews her? And not to mention how in the world a thief and conman manages to get her placed there. No explanation, no other accomplice. This is the first of many plot holes you could drive a truck through. Flora just happens to meet someone connected with the estate on the ship over and falls for him.
Addison is the main character for the contemporary (2000) parts. Every chapter changes time frame and point of view between Flora and Addison, and Jio tries to make every chapter end with a cliff-hanger. Consequently, there is no flow to the narrative and the reader feels constantly manipulated. This may be a technique espoused for a 'couldn't put it down' reaction, but it just felt hokey. Addison has hidden her past from her husband and is being blackmailed and threatened by someone who has recently gotten out of jail. Her husband Rex, an aspiring author, has very wealthy parents (of course - another lame trick) who have bought an estate in England and invited them to stay there on their own. Addison has her own landscape design business, but after being threatened by a stalker decides to drop everything and tells her husband they need to take up her in-laws' invitation. The huge house comes with a cook and elderly housekeeper. The devoted housekeeper has stayed on, and refused to leave, because it has always been her home, but most locals avoid the place because of its association with the mystery of the disappearance of local girls back in the 30's and 40's, as well as the unusual death of the former lady of the house.
Jio seems to have drawn here and there from Rebecca, The Secret Garden, and other British staples. Substitute "governess" for "nanny" and you get the idea. Her dialogue is awful, especially the one sentence each cloying conversations between Addison and her husband Rex. Flora, the 1940's character, was the more interesting and sympathetic one, as unlikely as her situation was. The holes in the plot just got bigger the farther it went, with the author not even bothering to try to explain them. The ending left gaps that the reader had nothing to build from as to what exactly had happened to Flora in the intervening years. It seemed like sheer laziness on the part of the author. The tension/suspense was overplayed and contrived, and it was obvious who the villain of the piece was. Sorry to say it, but this book just seemed stupid to me.