From an ordinary beginning, this story takes a sharp turn when five friends are magically transported into the past. Auntie Nellie, the fae controller of the time warp, seems to have an ulterior motive but just mumbles 'It's the magic,' when asked about it. Somewhere in the later parts of the story, a bit more explanation would have been nice about the reasons for the group going back in time. Is Auntie Nellie manipulating people's lives for her own purposes, genuinely wanting people to find love, or putting people in situations where they can improve the lives of others?
Jem is a modern day man with some issues about his past relationship with Reese. He is living his life and, like a lot of young men doesn't think too much about the implications of his actions, such as kissing Reese and then leaving for two years to follow his dreams. Did he kiss her because he was leaving and wanted to make a connection? I get the impression that he feels guilty for his feelings towards his sister's best friend and a girl who has been in his family fold since their childhood. Having a failed relationship with her could destroy much more than the two involved and he was probably out of line kissing her in the first place. The longer he lets their separation go on, the harder it is to reconnect.
Reese is a passionate woman who works for the underprivileged, therefore 1850 Victorian England is going to be a confronting challenge. But she has very little empathy for her surroundings, considering her background. Anyone who has worked in humanitarian situations will know that the first thing that happens is an assessment of all aspects of the challenge, with consideration for the people in need and their culture. Reese barrels in and imposes her modern day 'solutions' onto a Victorian village. The village is obviously in need, but she could, and should have found a way to help within the context of the era. She did find some ways, such as the old seamstress and the village women, but in general she just did her own thing. There's no mention of how the men reacted to her high-handedness and it would not have been readily accepted. In fact, the men don't seem to be there at all. An Earl would not take kindly to the way she interfered with his estate, even if he can see he should have been more responsible. There are slight references to his neglect, past tragedy, and his arrogance, as well as a general assumption that people in need are just lazy; all of which make the Earl's quick acceptance of Reese's project quite unlikely. His attitude towards Reese when they first meet doesn't match his compassion just a day later.
Kaitlyn seems to have found herself an 1850s suitor, but suddenly comes home with her modern day boyfriend. I presume there is a story there! The fifth member of the group is pretty much ignored altogether.
The assault scene is out of context for the times, as many women were compromised just by being caught in a room with an unmarried man. The violence of the attack, particularly by two men, is disturbing and was unnecessary. Which one of them was intending to force marriage on Reese? A lot of arrogant sneering by one of them, at her outfit, being outside exercising, etc. with an attempt to kiss her or even take advantage, would have been more true to the era. Even Ellen's slap to Sir Slimy would have been completely unacceptable in the times and Ellen would have been judged and condemned for her action.
I enjoyed reading this book, despite the criticism above, and gave it three stars for originality and a reasonable depth of character.