What do you think?
Rate this book
¿Qué es la arquitectura?: y 100 preguntas más
¿Es necesaria la arquitectura? ¿Cómo suenan los edificios? ¿Es posible poseer unas vistas? ¿Por qué las viejas fábricas son tan atractivas?¿Es Dubái una ciudad? ... y 96 preguntas más (con sus respuestas).
Gran parte de lo que aparece en este libro ya se ha dicho antes. Algunos arquitectos, como Adolf Loos, se expresaron con una claridad sin parangón en cuanto a la distinción entre arte y arquitectura. Gunnar Asplund habló, con una gran sabiduría, sobre el estilo de un momento y un lugar; Bruno Taut sobre el color y Jacques-François Blondel sobre el carácter de la arquitectura. En este libro, los autores han construido sobre esta antigua sabiduría y la han aplicado a situaciones contemporáneas con nuevas ideas: el mismo proceso, en otras palabras, que se emplea a la hora de hacer arquitectura.
Los arquitectos han intentado describir la esencia de la arquitectura como mínimo desde la antigüedad. Frente a otras formas de arte, se espera que la arquitectura se explique a sí misma. Si va a ser cara, merecemos conocer aquello por lo que pagamos. Además de la utilidad y la comodidad, la arquitectura puede añadir valor comercial al cliente de muchas maneras, entre las que se incluyen la promoción de una imagen, la publicidad o la generación de ingresos. Pero su enigmática esencia va más allá de los beneficios. ¿Cuál es esa esencia? Los autores han contado ciento una maneras diferentes de describirla.
Algunas de las respuestas pueden parecer contradictorias, que es exactamente lo que se pretende. La misma pregunta puede tener muchas respuestas correctas, como sabrá cualquiera que haya visitado una ciudad. El tema es, a la vez, tan divertido y tan serio que sería extraño que alguno de los edificios o las respuestas no abarcaran el espectro completo. Si este libro es capaz de ayudar al lector a que aprecie lo que puede ser un maravilloso (y emocionante) juego arquitectónico, se habrá conseguido uno de sus objetivos.
Gran parte de lo que aparece en este libro ya se ha dicho antes. Algunos arquitectos, como Adolf Loos, se expresaron con una claridad sin parangón en cuanto a la distinción entre arte y arquitectura. Gunnar Asplund habló, con una gran sabiduría, sobre el estilo de un momento y un lugar; Bruno Taut sobre el color y Jacques-François Blondel sobre el carácter de la arquitectura. En este libro, los autores han construido sobre esta antigua sabiduría y la han aplicado a situaciones contemporáneas con nuevas ideas: el mismo proceso, en otras palabras, que se emplea a la hora de hacer arquitectura.
Los arquitectos han intentado describir la esencia de la arquitectura como mínimo desde la antigüedad. Frente a otras formas de arte, se espera que la arquitectura se explique a sí misma. Si va a ser cara, merecemos conocer aquello por lo que pagamos. Además de la utilidad y la comodidad, la arquitectura puede añadir valor comercial al cliente de muchas maneras, entre las que se incluyen la promoción de una imagen, la publicidad o la generación de ingresos. Pero su enigmática esencia va más allá de los beneficios. ¿Cuál es esa esencia? Los autores han contado ciento una maneras diferentes de describirla.
Algunas de las respuestas pueden parecer contradictorias, que es exactamente lo que se pretende. La misma pregunta puede tener muchas respuestas correctas, como sabrá cualquiera que haya visitado una ciudad. El tema es, a la vez, tan divertido y tan serio que sería extraño que alguno de los edificios o las respuestas no abarcaran el espectro completo. Si este libro es capaz de ayudar al lector a que aprecie lo que puede ser un maravilloso (y emocionante) juego arquitectónico, se habrá conseguido uno de sus objetivos.
216 pages, Hardcover
First published January 1, 2013
15 people are currently reading
152 people want to read
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 17 of 17 reviews
March 28, 2016
What a funny little hot pink book! I picked this one off a library display table partially because of the size + color, but mostly because I've been reading/thinking a lot about the built environment lately. This book has 101 questions with each presenting a pithy short answer and long answer on the next page. It's a very oblique, philosophical look at architecture; and you can tell its the result of conversations between the authors.
Some questions I enjoyed and/or questions whose answers I enjoyed:
3. How long will modernity be dressed in glass? (Short answer: As long as you can claim that glass is almost nothing.)
7. What makes cities so fascinating? (Short answer: They're really, really complicated.)
28. What do buildings sound like? (Short answer: Good buildings sound quiet.)
32. What's the worst thing about architecture today? (Short answer: Ceilings.)
39. Should architects build on the best place on the site? (Short answer: No, next to it.)
49. What is architecture? (Short answer: The built image of ourselves.)
54. The opportunities seem infinite. If an architect could highlight just one quality, what should it be? (Short answer: Light.)
55. Where does form come from? (Short answer: The law of gravity.)
63. Is there something special about marble? (Short answer: Yes. Nothing is as devastating for artistic liberty as a good reputation.)
64. Why is uncompromising architecture so good? (Short answer: Because it's beautiful when everything works together.)
65. Why is uncompromising architecture so bad? (Short answer: Because people aren't all alike.)
69. What is noise? (Short answer: An evaluation.)
92. Is five better than four? (Short answer: Yes, for the most part.)
Some questions I enjoyed and/or questions whose answers I enjoyed:
3. How long will modernity be dressed in glass? (Short answer: As long as you can claim that glass is almost nothing.)
7. What makes cities so fascinating? (Short answer: They're really, really complicated.)
28. What do buildings sound like? (Short answer: Good buildings sound quiet.)
32. What's the worst thing about architecture today? (Short answer: Ceilings.)
39. Should architects build on the best place on the site? (Short answer: No, next to it.)
49. What is architecture? (Short answer: The built image of ourselves.)
54. The opportunities seem infinite. If an architect could highlight just one quality, what should it be? (Short answer: Light.)
55. Where does form come from? (Short answer: The law of gravity.)
63. Is there something special about marble? (Short answer: Yes. Nothing is as devastating for artistic liberty as a good reputation.)
64. Why is uncompromising architecture so good? (Short answer: Because it's beautiful when everything works together.)
65. Why is uncompromising architecture so bad? (Short answer: Because people aren't all alike.)
69. What is noise? (Short answer: An evaluation.)
92. Is five better than four? (Short answer: Yes, for the most part.)
July 27, 2021
ترجمه بد باعث شد بخش زیادی از منظور رو متوجه نشم، و خود کتاب هم زیاد به موضوعات تخصصی اشاره ای نمیکرد، دوستاره رو بخاطر سه چهار تا از پرسش و پاسخ ها میدم که جالب بودن.
January 31, 2019
This book at first glance might seem like another one of those non-informative lists in book form with no substantial return for the reader. It's pocket-sized, pink and comes with the premise to answer 101 questions, amongst which behemoth questions such as the name-giving 'What is architecture?' and 'What does architecture do for us?'.
Nonetheless drawn to the subject, I gave it a shot, and eventually I wasn't disappointed. In a good way. The authors convey some deep and profound points for such a compact format and surprised with some of the answers. Reading on, one soon realises that this is by no means a book that was done in a hurry, but is based on life-long observations and experience summarised beautifully in accessible but cunning prose.
Nonetheless drawn to the subject, I gave it a shot, and eventually I wasn't disappointed. In a good way. The authors convey some deep and profound points for such a compact format and surprised with some of the answers. Reading on, one soon realises that this is by no means a book that was done in a hurry, but is based on life-long observations and experience summarised beautifully in accessible but cunning prose.
December 17, 2018
"What is Architecture and 100 other very important questions" had some good one-liners.
November 17, 2019
Great book for people interested in architecture or people studying to architect.
March 11, 2021
This book has an interesting title What is Architecture and 100 other questions? And I thought potentially it could open pandora's box and it kind of did in one way or another. As the authors stated at the beginning some of their answers may be contradictory and they should be. In architecture there aren’t right or wrong answers, there is a different range of answers for a single question. The majority of the questions asked in this book are really important to be asked in architecture and they need to be out there so people can better understand what architecture is and what architects do. This book can be a starting point for anyone interested in architecture, the different range of topics that are brought up can be used to direct you to a certain architectural field that you might be interested in.
November 19, 2017
A pleasant and interesting read, although in some points it lacks some "edge"
January 2, 2019
Un libro que todo estudiante de arquitectura debe leer.
August 2, 2020
Vissa guldkorn, men också en hel del plattityder.
March 16, 2022
Kul ”take” på hela den fack-litterära genren. En hel del intressanta tankar och tips!
October 28, 2022
Kompakti, kevyt, hauska, runollinen.
August 8, 2023
A neat little book.
Architecture & Philosophy: correlation 100/10
Inspiration: Architects are cool
Additional thoughts: There are quotes in this book I can use later on
Architecture & Philosophy: correlation 100/10
Inspiration: Architects are cool
Additional thoughts: There are quotes in this book I can use later on
December 19, 2025
Just a quick read into someone's idea of architecture. Nothing special here.
August 29, 2020
Bra, lättläst, lättillgänglig. Ger inga djupa spår, men ändå funderare för stunden. Kanske går tillbaka till den och tittar på några frågor och svar.
July 3, 2016
This quirky little handbook is a great conversation piece. One hundred questions about architecture are posed and answered, in short and long(er) form. Questions are authors Rasmus Waern and Gert Wingardh's approach to describing the enigmatic essence of architecture.
The questions are what make the book so fun. I was hooked by the first one: Why is the world most beautiful at twilight? In the slivered space between reading the question and the short answer, my eyes drifted to reimagine the luminous frames in Sorrentino's "La Grande Bellezza". In the fraction of a moment, I knew this book wasn't just about architecture, and by extension, was reminded that architecture isn't just about architecture.
The answers are arguably incomplete and subjective. Yet after each question and answer set (short and long), I found myself closing the book to think more about the implications of the answers. I imagined sitting around a table deep in conversation with others who might have had different experiences and perspectives.
Other than the cover image and a few, small black and white thumbnails, there are no pictures in the book. However, I truly enjoyed the inevitable exercise of calling Fallingwater and Gaudi's Barcelona (for example) to mind when they were mentioned. Thus it seems this book is better suited for those basically versed in architecture- a continuing conversation, rather than a beginning one.
This little book is for the ages, a surprising treasure in an otherwise unassuming, albeit bright, package. A delightful find.
The questions are what make the book so fun. I was hooked by the first one: Why is the world most beautiful at twilight? In the slivered space between reading the question and the short answer, my eyes drifted to reimagine the luminous frames in Sorrentino's "La Grande Bellezza". In the fraction of a moment, I knew this book wasn't just about architecture, and by extension, was reminded that architecture isn't just about architecture.
The answers are arguably incomplete and subjective. Yet after each question and answer set (short and long), I found myself closing the book to think more about the implications of the answers. I imagined sitting around a table deep in conversation with others who might have had different experiences and perspectives.
Other than the cover image and a few, small black and white thumbnails, there are no pictures in the book. However, I truly enjoyed the inevitable exercise of calling Fallingwater and Gaudi's Barcelona (for example) to mind when they were mentioned. Thus it seems this book is better suited for those basically versed in architecture- a continuing conversation, rather than a beginning one.
This little book is for the ages, a surprising treasure in an otherwise unassuming, albeit bright, package. A delightful find.
September 10, 2016
Succinct and honest.
I like that a lot of ground was covered through questions explicitly about Architecture, and some not so directly related - because Architecture is about everything in some ways. It gave me insight into a lot of things I had asked myself but had not concluded to anything before on my own.
The Q&A format was like reading a conversation - you could imagine the process the authors went to writing them and that the answer published was something they had thoroughly discussed to get to that point. And the great thing about the answers are is that they make sense - sometimes logic in Architecture is blurry due to it being very subjective in a lot of ways. But this book proposes thoughts that I think a lot of people would also agree with - a general 'correctness'.
A compact and playful read - I can definitely see myself going back to certain pages to reference in the future.
I like that a lot of ground was covered through questions explicitly about Architecture, and some not so directly related - because Architecture is about everything in some ways. It gave me insight into a lot of things I had asked myself but had not concluded to anything before on my own.
The Q&A format was like reading a conversation - you could imagine the process the authors went to writing them and that the answer published was something they had thoroughly discussed to get to that point. And the great thing about the answers are is that they make sense - sometimes logic in Architecture is blurry due to it being very subjective in a lot of ways. But this book proposes thoughts that I think a lot of people would also agree with - a general 'correctness'.
A compact and playful read - I can definitely see myself going back to certain pages to reference in the future.
February 20, 2024
”32. ما أسوأ شيء في العمارة اليوم؟
-الأسقف.
لقد تطورت الأسقف من كونها الجزء المركزي الأهم في الغرفة الى كونها منطقة للتجهيزات الآلية. لقد اعتدنا دائماً في أعظم الأماكن في العالم كله أن ننظر الى أعلى في خشية ومهابة. وفي المساحة التي كانت أبصارنا تلتقي فيها من قبل أسقفا مُقوَّسة خيالية، أو مجموعة تراكيب مدهشة داعمة للسقف، او لمسات زخرفية مميزة، نجد اليوم عادة الألواح العازلة للصوت، وأشغال الأنانيب، ومصابيح الفلورسنت. ومنذ أن تخليّنا عن السقف بوصفه مساحة للإبداع مع بزوغ عصر التكنولوجيا، عانينا كثيرًا من أجل استعادته. ومن الصعب اليوم أن تنافس جميع هذه التجهيزات الآلية عندما يكون كل ماتطالب به هو سطح أبيض فارغ. لكن اذا فكرنا في رؤية الزامية لمكان مصمم بيحث يكون السقف ميزته الأساسية وأبرز ملامحه، فيمكن لهذه الرؤية أن تأسر حتى اكثر العقود براجماتية. ثمة سبب وجيه لأن تكون عنيداً ثابتاً على رأيك: مادمنا نادراً مانعيد تنظيم السقف أو زخرفته كما نفعل في باقي اجزاء المكان، فلننتبه الى ان ما نبدعه فوق رؤوسنا يدوم لزمن طويل.“
:(
-الأسقف.
لقد تطورت الأسقف من كونها الجزء المركزي الأهم في الغرفة الى كونها منطقة للتجهيزات الآلية. لقد اعتدنا دائماً في أعظم الأماكن في العالم كله أن ننظر الى أعلى في خشية ومهابة. وفي المساحة التي كانت أبصارنا تلتقي فيها من قبل أسقفا مُقوَّسة خيالية، أو مجموعة تراكيب مدهشة داعمة للسقف، او لمسات زخرفية مميزة، نجد اليوم عادة الألواح العازلة للصوت، وأشغال الأنانيب، ومصابيح الفلورسنت. ومنذ أن تخليّنا عن السقف بوصفه مساحة للإبداع مع بزوغ عصر التكنولوجيا، عانينا كثيرًا من أجل استعادته. ومن الصعب اليوم أن تنافس جميع هذه التجهيزات الآلية عندما يكون كل ماتطالب به هو سطح أبيض فارغ. لكن اذا فكرنا في رؤية الزامية لمكان مصمم بيحث يكون السقف ميزته الأساسية وأبرز ملامحه، فيمكن لهذه الرؤية أن تأسر حتى اكثر العقود براجماتية. ثمة سبب وجيه لأن تكون عنيداً ثابتاً على رأيك: مادمنا نادراً مانعيد تنظيم السقف أو زخرفته كما نفعل في باقي اجزاء المكان، فلننتبه الى ان ما نبدعه فوق رؤوسنا يدوم لزمن طويل.“
:(
Displaying 1 - 17 of 17 reviews