I honestly did like the book's cover title... but, when I started and finished the book. I was so confused with what I read.
I understood the context. I am able to read. I am able to rationalize the concepts. But. What I didn't understand was what the author was sourcing his context in revolving focus. Meaning... I had no clue... absolutely no idea, in regards to what the author was generating his context to further make clear, compliment, and quite market in the intention to have the reader be of the same interest as the author.
I realized that this book was very much written in a metaphorical interpretive way. I don't know if that was the intention, but that's how I was only able to make sense to a various amount of the book's context.
The analogical and metaphorical applications to the concepts and context of the book's logical and insightful offerings, was very abstract. The context of the book, very much contradicts the marketing attraction in which the book's title attracts the customer of being interested in the book.
The context contradicts the initial attractions "hook", meaning... why the customer would buy the book, and take the time to read, and basically, by reading... supporting the author as the author being a professional literaryist.
I don't dislike the author. The insights were very applicable. But. I just didn't like how unclear the book's context was. I didn't like... at all, how contradicting the book's context was to the title. Just literally destroyed all my positive hopes in developing applicable and relatable insight to the title. The topic, in which the book was marketed of elaborating and further explaining to ensure a more grasped clarity of the connotations of the title of the book, "how to change your mind".
The author does have very good skills in writing. I would advocate for him to further his literary career, and suggest him to really be more clear in his rationals. Rather than focusing on accounting for various contexts that allows for relatability from different perspective (multiple perspectives; different ways in which people perceive life). I suggest just to focus on how the author perceive's life, and account for the perception's logical context and rationales to the applications in which your knowledge is most inclined in default to rationalize the intellectual knowledge that is acquired and capable of being organized and identified. In whatever identifying context your knowledge is best organized in your rationalizing skills for your efforts of intellectualization.