Although it's less popular in the discourse than it was a few years ago, this slim book is an important addition to the conversation about a basic income. An economist in the medical school at the University of Manitoba, Forget argues that a basic income for Canadians would make us healthier, more productive and allow people to escape the grinding, humiliating trap of poverty that keeps people from reaching their full potential.
Forget devotes chapters to previous experiments, how we might pay for a basic income, what social programs we might keep or phase out, how a basic income could be structured to ensure responsiveness, and how a basic income would affect different populations. She also spends a chapter refuting common myths or arguments against a basic income.
Forget took in depth look into Mincome, conducted in Manitoba in the 1970s. Because part of Mincome took place in a small community where everyone received the basic income, she was able to draw some important conclusions. First of all, two groups of people did work work less: new mothers and young men who were over 18, but still hadn't completed their last year of high school. Mothers with babies waited longer to return to work, and young men were more like to complete high school than leave to get a job. More small businesses were also started or expanded. People also visited the doctor less with acute problems, but engaged in more preventative health activities. (So less people in the ER, but more at the dentist.) Finally, there was increased community cooperation and investment because people knew that everyone had a secure income.
It's an interesting and extremely accessible read. If you're convinced of the merits of a basic income, this will shore that up, and if you're just interested in the concept, there's a lot of food for thought here. If you're convinced it's a terrible idea, I'd still recommend this, because you'll be able to get a good look at the other side and prepare your talking points.