I'd picked up Melissa Zaldivar's new release "Kingdom Come" precisely because of the quote by JJ Heller, whose music I love and whose social media accounts I follow, as Heller has seldom steered me wrong when searching for meaningful supports and inspiration within the world of faith-based literature, music, and media.
I have to admit, however, that I struggled quite a bit with "Kingdom Come," a book by a new author who seems to be finding her literary voice and whose writing here seems caught somewhere between a lot of the contemporary Christian female voices writing today and something along the lines of a more theologically-centered discussion on the Kingdom of God and Presence of God.
Part of my concern with "Kingdom Come" is that Zaldivar writes with a lot of generalities. We learn very little about her in the book. We learn very little about her faith journey. Even in her bio on the book's cover, we essentially learn that she graduated from Gordon-Conwell Seminary and is a freelance writer.
That's pretty much it.
If someone's going to take me along on a journey where I'm supposed to accept their advice and/or expertise, a relationship needs to be built. "Kingdom Come," at least for me, never really builds that relationship. There's some decent stories along the way. I also think Zaldivar has an obvious theological basis from where she works - those who prefer a wealth of Scripture in these types of books should be happy with Zaldivar's approach. However, I had a very difficult time relating to anything in "Kingdom Come" and that limited the material's potential impact. Zaldivar writes a lot about a therapist - I think that's a great example. If you go to a therapist, you build a relationship with that therapist and over time you begin to trust their ability to help guide your life. An awful lot of "Kingdom Come" feels like Zaldivar saying "I can't believe I'm writing a book."
The biggest issue for me with "Kingdom Come" was this - quite simply, by the time I finished the relatively quick read I found myself wondering "What was this really all about?" I thought to myself "Sure, there were some intellectual indicators, but really...what was this about?" I had a hard time discerning what I was supposed to take away from the book even though, theoretically, it's right there in the title.
Quite honestly, that's not what I got out of "Kingdom Come."
This may sound overly negative, and it's certainly not meant that way, but I'm actually not sure what I did get out of "Kingdom Come." I don't regret reading it. I enjoyed parts of it and I found the energy and encouraging nature of Zaldivar's writing a positive experience. While she's likely considerably younger than I am, I found myself thinking "I bet we'd have a great chat." I simply didn't really connect with the material here.
There were other positives.
I suppose it shouldn't matter, but I kind of think it does and it's kind of unique for faith-based writers. As near as I can tell Zaldiver is single and without a family. It seems like faith-based publishers have long given more attention to married male or female writers with a family (or beyond the age of having children). It's rather refreshing to have a young, single voice who speaks with some spiritual authority and a seminary foundation.
You also get the sense that Zaldivar is incredibly early in her career, perhaps a bit too early to have warranted a book, and it's going to be fun to watch her grow in terms of literary voice and in how she defines her growing ministry. While there's a little bit of negative in here in terms of how the stories are ultimately written, there's something refreshing about a new voice saying "Hey, I'm still figuring out this stuff myself. Here's what I'm doing and why I'm doing it."
I think where the newness kind of backfires is simply that sometimes Zaldivar writes from some insecurity. I don't think it's intended as insecurity, but that's how it struck me. I think, for example, when she basically writes that, and this is paraphrased, "My first real ministry job was last year," then that leaves me thinking "Then why are you writing a book?" I think this falls back to the tonal inconsistencies - I think if the book had been primarily testimonial, it would have been less noticeable. However, because Zaldivar does write from a place of expertise much of the time then maybe that expertise needs to be more reflected. This doesn't mean you need to have years of experience or otherworldly achievements. It does mean, just perhaps, you shouldn't diss yourself so much when you're trying to get me to trust your expertise.
For me, I suppose, it comes down to this simple opinion. "Kingdom Come" is a promising book by a promising new author. Melissa Zaldivar is still figuring out her distinct literary voice, though I'm confident she has one and actually will find that voice. There's much to appreciate here, though my sense is that "Kingdom Come" will most resonate with young adults who will appreciate Zaldivar's fresh, unwavering, knowledge-based voice that also offers a richness of authenticity and not the usual "I'm the expert. Listen to me." approach offered by some of today's contemporary Christian writers.
I contemplated a 2-star rating, but that's too low. I may not have gotten a ton out of the book, but I think "Kingdom Come" will reach people and has some material that will reach younger adults. For those of us who've lived, perhaps, more complex lives (or traumatic, or who simply have more stories to tell) it will feel rather fundamental or even simple.
But, it's better than 2-stars. I briefly contemplated a 4-star, because I see lots of promise here. Ultimately, I had enough concerns about the book that I simply couldn't go a 4-star. So, 3-stars it is because I can give the book a recommendation and judging from some of the reviews here on Goodreads it's definitely connecting with an audience that appreciates Zaldivar's voice.
I look forward to reading her future works and am anxious to watch her journey with this one.