Yashwant Sinha is one of the fiercest, bravest and most well-respected critics of the Narendra Modi government. A former finance minister, he has seen first-hand and steered the country out of several crises, including the East Asian Crisis of 1997 and the sanctions that the US imposed on India in 1998 after the nuclear tests. Sinha's tenure as finance minister in the Atal Bihari Vajpayee government is celebrated as a golden period of economic reform and infrastructure building. In this book, he says the things that many are thinking but few have the courage to say. He looks back at the Modi government's economic and development track record and separates the truth from the PR spin. He also compares the political leadership and vision of Modi and Vajpayee. What emerges is a deeply troubling portrait of a prime minister and a government that have wasted a once-in-a-lifetime mandate.
The author ,a former Finance Minister , pens a sharp critique of the present government's management of the economy . He dons the cap of an economics teacher and patiently explains to us basics like "what is fiscal deficit?","what is NPA?" etc thus making it clear that his target audience comprises casual readers too .His experiences as a minister will interest the policy-makers who read this tome. It has to be said that the entire book is a series of criticisms alone thus spoiling the book's credibility. In one paragraph, the author goes on about how rains had failed in a year ruining agricultural prospects. I half-expected him to blame Modi for that too.
This book takes you to the journey of Indian economic development post independence but more importantly it uncovers the false promises of Modi government. Rigged statistics, announcements of programmes but no allocation of funds, blame game and oblivious attitude of this government are few of many revelations in this book.
This book is like, it was written by a village level leader, and not like a former Finance Minister of India.
When a village level leader writes a book, he/she would take the news items in the popular newspapers and compile them into a book and release it.
When a reasonably good leader writes a book, he/she would atleast listen to the reasons of others once, before criticizing based on a news article.
When a serious journalist or a big leader writes a book, he/she would get all the information from all the parties concerned, asks them relevant questions till they don't have any more information to share, and finally writes a book with his/her opinions and the facts told by all the parties.
Before reading the book written by a former Senior Cabinet Minister, I expected that he would consider all the points of the Government before criticizing them. But, he criticized the Government like a village level leader without even listening to the basic explanation from the Government side on many points.
A small example of his criticism on NPAs.
When this government presented in Parliament the Economic Survey of 2014, it quantified bad loans, or NPAs, at Rs. 2.05 lakh crore. Then, in October 2018, Jaitley shifted the blame to the previous government, saying the NPAs when Modi took office were not Rs.2.05 lakh crore but Rs. 8.5 lakh crore. Did he then lie to Parliament in 2014? If yes, this demands a privilege motion against the finance minister.
This paragraph is enough to tell that he is blindly accusing Modi either by hiding the actual facts or without understanding the basics.
Till 2014, the banks were are not recognizing many loans as NPAs eventhough they are NPAs. They were restructuring the loans and making them ever green. Raghuram Rajan stopped that, and in 2015, he had done Asset Quality Review of the loans, and many loans were now recognized as NPAs eventhough it was not marked as NPA initially. This led to an increase in the actual NPAs.
Arun Jaitley might have mentioned that, after the Asset Quality Review, they might have recognized that the actual NPAs were Rs. 8.5 lakh crore.
If Yashwant Sinha had done some research on his own and comes up with some number, and say that, the actual NPAs were Rs. 4 lakh crore and not Rs. 8.5 lakh crore as mentioned by Arun Jaitley, it would have been little reasonable, irrespective of whether his claims are correct or not.
Instead, talking about the privilege motion against the finance minister clearly tells that his only goal was, blaming Modi and his government by relying on out of context data points.
For many of his criticisms, I heard some reasoning from the government. What I expected from this book is, his counter points on the reasons by the government. But, I did not find any. All his criticisms are very lame.